that wasnt the point. you said he could just wash off his face and cease to be a freak. i countered that by pointing out he is perma deformed. and i would hardly call a scarred smile on somebody who goes by the joker "completely random".
Okay, it's not random, but it has nothing to do with the canon character either. I mean if Catwoman had an actual tail and real whiskers in a film version of Batman, that wouldn't be "random" but it would be "unfaithful" and "unnecessary" and a bad choice, IMO.
and there are just as many die hard fans (likely more in fact) that are ok with it or outright love it. this thread is actually proof of that. but as it has become painfully obvious, the haters cry louder, harder, and longer. i have a feeling they will be eating some crow in about three weeks though as such considerations will likely be rendered moot. you'll see, heath 'll show ya.
and there is also plenty of argument to be made (in this very thread in fact) that the changes do in fact serve the character, at least this incarnation of it at least. i would quote some of the more well written and thought out posts but since you seem to be dead set on hating nearly everything about nolan's take i will refrain as nothing anyone says will likely change your seemingly already made up mind.
1.) Not liking how they pulled together the Jokers look has
nothing to do with Heath's performance,
(which by the way I loved even in the beginning when what I originally thought the performance was going to be like based on the early marketing didn't fit my conception of the character.) So let's not go there as if not liking the make-up is somehow doubting Heath and the awesome job he did, or disrespecting him and his memory in any way.
2.) I'm not dead set on hating "nearly everything about Nolans take" just because I'm not a Joker-in-make-up fan. Which by the way is more in the jurisdiction of the art, costuming and make-up department, than Nolan personally. I'm having a lot of problems with the costume department on this film, between the Jokers look and the new Bat-suit. I seriously doubt it was Nolan himself who said "well I absolutely hate the BB design, I demand that we have a robo-cop looking Batman or else!" He probably just told them "make it a little more comfortable for Christian" and they designed the "look" on their own. Same with the joker. He probably said "well I want the joker to look very gritty and scary" which can be done many ways, and then the costume/makeup people thought "Oh we'll have grungy, crusty make-up, and ratty clothes..."
On a film this MASSIVE the director doesn't handle all the details. The only things I would personally "blame" Nolan for is how the shots are set up and how the actors play their scenes....because that's the directors job, and I haven't had any complaints in that regard.
Honestly I wish you'd stop thinking I hate Nolan personally or something just because of various issues with the films I have. Did Nolan write the script for BB?
No he did not, and that is what I didn't like about BB. Did Nolan apply Jokers make-up and pick out his grungy coat from some flea-market himself?
No he did not. He lets other people do those things and only if it were something horrendously offensive to his vision would he put his foot down and stop it, otherwise he'd let the professionals and artists on the set do their job.