THWIP* said:
JUST LIKE THE O.J. SIMPSON TRIAL.
You have to take into consideration though that the prosecution spent 100 million on investigating and super star OJ style lawyers. They tried to buy a guilty verdict. Mj only spent 20 million on investigating and lawyers.
The reson he wasn't convicted wasn't because they proved he wasn't a child molester, because they definitely did not prove that. The reason he wasn't convicted was because they proved beyond any doubt that that boy and his family's story was false. It really got to the point where there was no way their story could be true. That on top of the fact that they falsely accused others in the past, there on tape saying nothing happened, they proved they were trying to milk MJ for money as well as Chris Tucker, Jay Leno, and other stars, and even charities, and while sequestered nobody's story matched up even remotely close. And not only that but while being supposedly held prisoner for 3 weeks they were caught on film coming and going at their own free will with credit cards that they stole from Michael Jackson. they went on huge spending sprees for days at a time, when they were supposedly trapped and kidnapped. they had receits and witnesses from the places they went spending to prove this as well.
I thought he was guilty too, until the trial, and I can tell you court tv, did not cover that accurately. they acted like the enquirer with that trial. MSNBC was somewhat objective, but the only accurate coverage was the E-channel reanactments because you found out word for word what was said according to the courtroom transcripts.
I knew he wouldn't be convicted, as did most attornerys.
