Tomorrow When The War Began

jmc

away for a while
Joined
May 20, 2007
Messages
35,885
Reaction score
2,700
Points
103
Tomorrow%2C_When_the_War_Began_theatrical_poster.jpg


I know, it looks awful.


Most probably haven't heard of this film yet, most probably won't even see this film when it opens overseas but I thought I'd give it a plug anyway seeing as it opened yesterday here in Australia and across the ditch in New Zealand, it's also opening up at the Toronto Film Festival in a couple of weeks too. This film is Australia's first genuine attempt at a film franchise ever. It's being financed by Paramount for $AU20 Million, which is a freakin' huge budget for an Aussie film, stars a bunch of local unknowns mostly from TV soap operas and was filmed entirely here. What's it about? It's based on a series of beloved and popular books written by John Marsden known as 'The Tomorrow Series', if you were a teen in the early 90's in Australia chances are you read this series. The plot is basically:

A group of high school teenagers from the country town of Wirrawee return from a camping trip in the bush to find houses deserted and phone lines cut. They soon discover that their country has been invaded and decided to take action against the invasion.
Sound familiar? Red Dawn probaby rings a few bells to some, film about a group of teens who take on Soviet invaders, however this series is more about the narrator of the war Ellie Linton and how the war changes her and not really about the war itself, we learn very little of the war outside of Ellie's country town, who the invaders are or how the war is going for Australia as the story is written in the form of hand written diary.

The film is the directorial debut for screenwriter Stuart Beatie, best known for doing the screenplays of such films as the first Pirates of the Caribbean film and Collateral.

Official Trailer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_KhErNyiq8

My review is as follows.

I know what you're thinking coz I thought the exact same thing when I first saw the trailer for this film. This look awful. An Aussie film trying to masquerade itself as a Hollywood blockbuster? Then the poster came out and I laughed hysterically at how poorly designed and cliched it was. The character one sheets were even worse. It's bad enough we've got so many TV shows and music artists trying to emulate what American artists do but now our films? There was something so un-Australian about the look of this film, it looked like a dogs breakfast waiting to be served. And yet it isn't, this film is surprisingly good, in fact a crap load better than I anticipated.

I've only read the first book and the series but I never bought the premise. Australia get's invaded in a surprise attack for some unknown reason by some 'unnamed country'. Really? Anyone realize just how big Australia is and how enormous a task of invading this country would be? The invading military force would have to be absolutely massive. And a surprise attack? Who wouldn't see a force of such enormity coming especially with today's technology? Not only that but apparently our only ally in the whole war is New Zealand. :whatever:

But I digress, the story follow the book fairly closely, a group of 7 friends head off for the long weekend into the bush for a camping trip. The story is narrated by Ellie, although instead of writing down the events in the film she records her diary on an iphone. After a fun few days in the bush the kids return home to find Ellie's house empty, her dog dead and all the power turned off. They then discover Australia has been invaded and the townsfolk have been rounded up in concentration camps.

The tone shifts rather quickly in this film, it's all bright and cheerful in the first half an hour with the kids having fun, camping, hunting, playing rugby, but the mood quickly changes when the kids get home, and is punctuated by a particular graphic scene in which Ellie looks on in horror as a man in one of the concentration camps is shot squarely in the head apologetically. This is where the film starts getting really tense and the kids must then decided whether to stick together and save themselves or to try and help their town against the invaders.

I gotta say the action is actually quite good in this film, surprisingly good actually, there's a chase sequence involving a garbage truck that's on par with most car chase sequences you see. A scene involving an exploding law mower is also quite impressive, and the CGI whilst not 100% perfect is pretty acceptable. And the film is shot beautifully, the Aussie bush hasn't looked this good in years.

The casting is unfortunately average for the most part across the board with the exception of it's lead actress, Caitlin Stasey is a name to look out for in the future, she really brings Elli to life here. Her character is the first of the group to kill an enemy solider and it haunts her for the rest of the film, she's the only one of the cast that genuinely comes across as having changed from innocent teen to soldier of war, emphasized by one particular scene where she pulls a gun on one of her group for falling asleep at the watch and screaming 'the punishment for falling asleep at the watch is death' and spewing F-bombs (yeah that's right America, we use F@#$ in our blockbusters). I gotta give credit to Caitlin, she is totally believable, she's ten times the role model to teen girls than what that doe-eyed, whiny Bella from Twilight is, just damn shame the rest of the cast is fairly average.

MV5BMTUzMzM4NzMwOF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMzE5MjMxMw@@._V1._SX372_SY455_.jpg


Look out for this girl in the future.

A few more nit picks include the dialog which is clunky at times, and the climax of the film which is shot poorly and moves along way to quickly, there's also an annoying 'heroes shot' at the end of the film that I didn't like and sure there's alot of 'yeah but...' type of questions but overall it's a damn enjoyable film. I think Stuart Beattie has done a bang up job here, he's added just enough Hollywood to this film to make it appealing to wider audiences, but at the same time it is still quintessentially an Australian movie and I encourage the few Aussies on this board to get behind this movie, our industry is in dire need of a big hit and this could be it. There is talk of doing sequels if this film is received well and given there's another 6 books left and I for one would welcome them, anything to kick start an Aussie film franchise is a good thing to me.

7/10
 
Last edited:
Pfft... I've invaded Australia many a time. Mostly to get to Asia. Siam is the gateway.
 
Been a fan of the books since I was 15 years old and accidentally picked them up in my school library.

Unfortunately I'm in England, but I will never understand why they are not more universally popular.

The books are outstanding. Best books I have ever read. Had such a deep effect on me, that it actually squashed my ability to get into books for a while after reading them, because nothing was as good. Have read them all numerous times, and am soooooooo excited to see the movie when it finally makes its way over here in one form or another.
 
I already made a thread for it. This is why you will Aussies lost the Civil War of 1812 to us. We're more smartest!


Seriously, I've been hearing good reviews for this. I know it's not coming to the US theatrically so I'll catch the DVD.
 
^ Yeah they're pretty good so far, although keep in mind most are from Aussie reviewers, I tend to think overseas critics might be a little more harsh on the film but most tend to agree it's a solid, though not spectacular film. Word is Paramount are going to do a limited U.S. run depending on how well it's received at Toronto. I actually don't know why they're not trying to give this more international exposure, it might be set in Australia but it's not limited to Australian audiences, it's has a very broad appeal, as I said above it's a very Hollywood type of film, I don't know why this couldn't have a decent overseas run given the right promotion. I know the Red Dawn remake has been shelved indefinitely so I'm curious to see if a U.S. run of Tomorrow has any baring on that film being released.
 
Last edited:
JMC, it doesn't look that bad. The trailer does suck, but it doesn't look as bad as you initially describe it.
 
^ From an Aussie perspective the trailer looked very cringe worthy on first viewing, but turns out it's much better than I thought. Australians don't take well to stuff we make being Americanised, but perhaps a little Hollywood in our local films isn't necessarily a bad thing after all.
 
The Home and Away acting doesn't make me want to see this. Especially when I saw five people take on an army couple of weeks ago with a much better cast.
 
^ Caitlin's the sole reason the casting doesn't collapse completely, she pretty much picks up all the slack the others leave with their mediocre acting. Surprising too given she's originally from Neighbours, a show that acting requirements is about on par with Home and Away's, this was a huge task for her and she nailed it, at the very least you can say they got the lead character casting right which is the most important. She's the only convincing one out of all of them so I suggest seeing it just to watch her, I think she's gonna make a name for herself in the future.
 
Apparently this movie was successful enough in Oz to encourage backers to plan 2 sequels to this film, to be made back to back by Beattie. I'd see it if it ever plays locally. Another Aussie film, 'Animal Kingdom', surprisingly is, and I plan on seeing that this week. Why not 'Tomorrow..."?

Back-to-back sequels for Aussie actioner 'Tomorrow, When the War Began' (exclusive)

Plans are being drafted for Stuart Beattie to return to write and direct the second and third installments of “Tomorrow, When the War Began,” the Australian action movie that has proven to be a hit at the Oz box office.

The sequels will also reunite the original cast and producers, including Omnilab Media, which co-financed the movie.

No deals have been made and the movies, which will be shot back-to-back, have not been officially greenlit, although that is expected to change in the coming weeks.

“Tomorrow” is based on a popular Australian YA book series by John Marsden and tells the story of a group of high school students who return from a camping trip to find their hometown invaded by a foreign army. In “Red Dawn” fashion, they begin to wage a guerilla war on the invaders.

Inferno Entertainment, handling the foreign sales, screened the movie for buyers in Toronto Sunday.

“Tomorrow,” which opened in Australia on Sept. 3, had the third largest opening for an Australian movie behind “Happy Feet” and “Australia” and was the largest for a film not financed by a U.S. studio. It passed the $5 million mark in its first week.

Back in its home country, the film is making stars out of its young leads, particularly Caitlin Stasey, a TV actress making her feature debut.

And the movie is being noted for bringing younger demos, more accustomed to flocking to high-octane Hollywood fare, back to theaters to watch homegrown movies.

“Tomorrow” is CAA-repped Beattie’s directorial debut. He is best known for his script work, which includes “Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl,” “Australia” and “G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra."

http://heatvision.hollywoodreporter.com/2010/09/tomorrow-when-the-war-began-stuart-beattie.html
 
^ Caitlin's the sole reason the casting doesn't collapse completely, she pretty much picks up all the slack the others leave with their mediocre acting. Surprising too given she's originally from Neighbours, a show that acting requirements is about on par with Home and Away's, this was a huge task for her and she nailed it, at the very least you can say they got the lead character casting right which is the most important. She's the only convincing one out of all of them so I suggest seeing it just to watch her, I think she's gonna make a name for herself in the future.

Why is that surprising? Guy Pearce and Russell Crowe were on Neighbours too. Home And Away had Heath Ledger, Naomi Watts, Julian McMahon and Melissa George, among many others. Simon Baker started out on E Street. Some of our best actors started out on soaps. :yay:
 
Last edited:
Why is that surprising? Guy Pearce and Russell Crowe were on Neighbours too. Home And Away had Heath Ledger, Naomi Watts, Julian McMahon and Melissa George, among many others. Simon Baker started out on E Street. Some of our best actors started out on soaps. :yay:

C'mon man, you know very well that for every Russel Crowe or Naomi Watts there's 50 other actors on that show that couldn't act their way out of a parking ticket. Caitlin was a genuine surprise and a good one, too bad the rest of the cast aren't better. Good to see sequels being made, you seen the film yet?
 
Apparently this movie was successful enough in Oz to encourage backers to plan 2 sequels to this film, to be made back to back by Beattie. I'd see it if it ever plays locally. Another Aussie film, 'Animal Kingdom', surprisingly is, and I plan on seeing that this week. Why not 'Tomorrow...'?

The Tomorrow series never really caught on big anywhere outside Australia (maybe New Zealand's the only other place it made some sort of impact). Depends on how well it's received at Toronto, there's no reason it could do a decent run overseas, it's an Aussie film but it's very much Hollywood like film, I have no doubt it would have appeal.
 
I saw it 2 nights ago with my mate, who had already seen it & wanted to see it again. I knew nothing about it at all, never even knew the movie existed & frankly after hearing about it I had no desire to see it. It sounded weak, as most of our Aussie films do, but I watched it & damn, it was a fine piece of film making. Most of the effects were so well done I had trouble knowing which were effects & which were practical. The acting was also better than most Aussie movies. It honestly felt like an epic American movie but with a great Aussie landscape & characters. It's the kinda movie I couldn't understand us Aussies having not made sooner. We need American movie style film making, but without losing our Aussie culture to MTV style film making. I give it a 8 out of 10. I look forward to the sequel. If the movie was this good then the books must be mind blowing. Sadly I don't read. :csad:





Steve
 
C'mon man, you know very well that for every Russel Crowe or Naomi Watts there's 50 other actors on that show that couldn't act their way out of a parking ticket. Caitlin was a genuine surprise and a good one, too bad the rest of the cast aren't better. Good to see sequels being made, you seen the film yet?

I know that. I'm just not surprised.

I haven't seen it yet. I probably won't until it's out on dvd. I hate going to the movies.
 
Last edited:
So I just got back from seeing it and I really liked it! I don't usually like Australian films but I did read the books in High School and the film was quite a good adaption. They cleaned it up a bit but still, the tension and the action was really good and the girl who played Ellie really grew on me.

The film was sort of like "Skins"(the tv show) meets "Mad Max"
 
^ Probably not a bad comparison actually.
 
I thought it was very hit and miss. The overall story was good, but it was adapted from strong source material. But they did an overall good job of translating the story to the screen in tact. The action was mostly well done.

Where it fell apart was the character work. Homer was good, I bought into his charisma (however I thought his introductory scene at the police station was stupid). I also liked his transformation into the co-leader of the group, though he had this annoying tic where whenever he got an idea, he would smile before he spoke. I wish he'd just kept his focus, I think it would have been more effective.

Kevin was great, I liked Lincoln Lewis a lot and thought he did a good job of translating an often unsympathetic character to the screen. Corrie was good, and Robyn, although she was about three years too young.

I hated hated hated Chris. I found his scenes unwatchable. Talk about playing into every single stoner cliche. I ended up liking Fi despite myself. They dumbed her character down a lot; there was supposed to be a class divide between her and the others, but they really just played her up as a "blonde". However I thought she had charisma and she and Homer had chemistry. Unfortunately their relationship happened mostly off screen.

Ellie and Lee, unfortunately, had none. I found their scenes unconvincing and painful to watch. Lee, the opposite of Robyn, looked about 2 years too old, but I actually thought he was appealing on his own.

Ellie didn't work for me. I just didn't buy her as a country girl. She's so thin, her face is so finely chiseled, her movements so poised - she's a city girl. Her 'farm house' was also pretty damn fancy for struggling rural Australia. It's a pity that she was such a miss for me, because the whole film centres around her.

Actors aside, I thought a lot of the dialogue fell flat, which was frustrating considering Marsden managed to capture their voices so effectively. How old is Beattie? late 40s, early 50s? It came across to me that here was a middle aged man trying to bridge the generation gap and failing. The pinky promise? Jesus Christ.

They should have got a young hot-shot director like Nash Edgerton or David Michod to handle this. The whole film felt very 'safe', I think it needed more of an edge that a younger filmmaker could have delivered.

I also hated the ending, with them standing on the mountain top (in an obvious composite shot) all decked out with gear. Lee had a bloody rocket launcher! That was just ridiculous. The books were way more about them using the resources they had around them than stocking up on heavy artillery. The film ended on a very false note for me.

Despite all that, I did like it overall. As I said, the story was translated mostly in tact, and it is an awesome story. It's worth seeing and I hope they make more of them, but ideally with Beattie producing. The films need some hot blood guiding them, not a middle aged writer. Directing is a very different skill to writing, and I think Beattie was not the best person to shepherd this film to the screen.
 
I think the main problem with the dialog is that a lot of it comes from the book which to be honest was always an issue for me, Marden's writings always felt a tad cheesy at times but maybe that was because I was older when I read it. It also surprised me given the types of films Beattie's written that he would allow so much of the dialog from the book to remain in the script. I agree with the ending, that 'heroes shot' really rubbed me the wrong way.
 
Just watched it and I loved it. I hope sequels get made and cant wait for them to come out.
 
I believe this is getting international release dates very soon for the UK, South Africa and a few other places, no word yet on Nth America. Stay tuned.
 
"Tomorrow" Sequel Shoots In Sydney

By Garth Franklin Saturday February 26th 2011 12:05AM
After a year with no major film productions in Australia, the local industry is breathing a sigh of relief as for the second Saturday in a row a major feature is set to begin shooting.
Following on from the announcement of Baz Luhrmann's "The Great Gatsby" last weekend, the NSW Government announced today production would kick off shortly in Sydney on a sequel to last year's $27 million action feature "Tomorrow, When the War Began".
 
I bet this sequel will be like the last and beat Red Dawn to cinema too.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"