train your husbands..like they're animals.

[jaguarr]

I just spritz my husband with the spray bottle, give him a firm 'no!' and he sulks under the bed for a few hours.

Are you sure he's just "sulking" under there?

jag

 

[CorpusBlack]

I'm not picking up any damn socks until I get a pot pie and a happy ending.

 

[Logan's Runt]

Are you sure he's just "sulking" under there?

jag

Eh, as long as he's out of my way and quiet, I don't really care what he's doing.

 

[moraldeficiency]

Personally I don't mind this concept at all. If my girl wants to "train" me to do some @hit I probably should be doing anyway, I don't want endless conversations about that trivial crap, I'd rather just get my "treat" and hopefully just start doing it on impulse. I think there's a difference between having an open relationship where you feel free to talk about anything and endlessly going on about everything.

I mean really which would you rather, to have to hear about your bad habits every @ucking day getting nagged about every small imperfection you possess or just having some of your behavior modified so you instinctively wash the dishes or whatever the problem is. Some people just hate the term training, people think their above it. Everyone's, I mean everyone's, actions are the result of being trained in one form or another. From wiping your ass to doing your job, you were trained for it. Big deal.

 

[terry78]

^If you enjoy having your wife metaphorically castrate you, then go ahead.

 

[moraldeficiency]

^If you enjoy having your wife metaphorically castrate you, then go ahead.

Better my wife then your mother, who probably trained the majority of your behavior into you. You've already been trained, you just hate the term. Now go home and listen to your girl/wife ***** endlessly about every little thing she hates about you in your open relationship, cause that sounds much more enticing then having cutting out the talk on petty @hit and having her modulate your behavior a bit.

Besides are you really going to tell me you haven't done the same thing? You don't modify the behavior of your coworkers, friends, and family so as to encourage the points you like/love about them and tune down the @hit you don't like? Are you castrating them, or just trying to get along better without sounding like a whiney little @itch?

 

[Wilhelm-Scream]

Personally I don't mind this concept at all. If my girl wants to "train" me to do some @hit I probably should be doing anyway, I don't want endless conversations about that trivial crap, I'd rather just get my "treat" and hopefully just start doing it on impulse. I think there's a difference between having an open relationship where you feel free to talk about anything and endlessly going on about everything.

I mean really which would you rather, to have to hear about your bad habits every @ucking day getting nagged about every small imperfection you possess or just having some of your behavior modified so you instinctively wash the dishes or whatever the problem is.

You shouldn't have to be trained to be a considerate, aware person by the time you're married.
We cover that elementary s*** when we're kids.

It's also gross that you'd rather just "hope you start improving on impulse", instead of being a man and a good lover and actively deciding whether it's fair of her to ask you to change, and if it is, deciding to change.

Also, talking about issues does not equal "endless conversations about trivialities".
1) There's a difference between talking and repetitive nagging.
2) It isn't that trivial if it's something that bugs your wife enough that she would go out on a months long campaign of behavioral conditioning.

 

[moraldeficiency]

You shouldn't have to be trained to be a considerate, aware person by the time you're married.
We cover that elementary s*** when we're kids.

It's also gross that you'd rather just "hope you start improving on impulse", instead of being a man and a good lover and actively deciding whether it's fair of her to ask you to change, and if it is, deciding to change.

Also, talking about issues does not equal "endless conversations about trivialities".
1) There's a difference between talking and repetitive nagging.
2) It isn't that trivial if it's something that bugs your wife enough that she go out on a months long campaign of behavioral conditioning.

You shouldn't but this world is far from perfect and I'm considerably more flawed than that. Besides there are things I just don't care too much about, but since they bother her I should take care of it, I just don't really think of them. I wish someone in my elementary school had pulled me aside and taught me to be perfectly caring like you, but that's what I get for going to public school.

And, yeah, I'd rather just naturally do some of the stuff that I don't normally think of then have to remind myself about them (cause I'll often forget). Not to mention associating the task as a chore I'd be doing just so I didn't have to hear about it later. I'd rather it just naturally occur to me. I'm not sure that some of the @hit she'd like me to do more regularly constitutes "being a man" (sorry that's a laughable term for this), it's just stuff I don't prioritize very highly and getting @itched at about it won't help the matter. Sorry that's gross to you.

Talking about everything does make life more trivial. Sorry, but that's me. Maybe you like to hear every thought in someone's head, not my bag. We're different people with very different lives and tastes. Not everything we do interests each other, so we don't go on about certian things. For example she doesn't dig comics, I don't like modern art. So I don't bring up Spider-Man to her and she doesn't tell me what new exhibits have moved her. Doesn't make us less of a couple, but maybe it does to you.

1. Talking repetively about something you want changed in someone else's behavior is kinda nagging to me. End of the day, somethings just will not occur to me, unless I'm nagged or reconditioned. Of the two I prefer to be reconditioned.
2. I guess it depends on what that month's long campaign is made up of. Can't you reward someone by doing something you also enjoy? And complimenting someone you care about shouldn't be that difficult or painful a process, you should want to do it anyway cause you like/love them so why not be practical and compliment them while getting them more used to doing something they consider trivial but kinda urks you.

Note, I'm not talking about anything big, but the little things. I'd mop the floor once a week, she'd rather it done twice a week. It's these points I'd rather not have to discuss and hear about all the time.

 

[Whirlysplat]

^If you enjoy having your wife metaphorically castrate you, then go ahead.

That sounds so wrong, and yet so kinky.....

 

[Obi-Ron]

I mean really which would you rather, to have to hear about your bad habits every @ucking day getting nagged about every small imperfection you possess or just having some of your behavior modified so you instinctively wash the dishes or whatever the problem is.

I've got spurs that jingle, jangle, jungle
as I go walking merrily along.

And they sing "Oh ain't you glad you're single?"
And that song, ain't so very far from wrong.

 

[Obi-Ron]

I'd mop the floor once a week, she'd rather it done twice a week. It's these points I'd rather not have to discuss and hear about all the time.

If you both mop once, everybody's happy.

 

[moraldeficiency]

If you both mop once, everybody's happy.

Nah, we divide jobs based on what we're better at. I can mop easier cause I can move the furniture easily, she does things like the dishes.

 

[CieloAzul]

Yeah. For some reason I can't do anything right. Guess who does everything else?

 

[William_C]

Does it work both ways?

 

[CieloAzul]

Not unless I want it to.

 

[chaseter]

I'll be an animal...in bed!