The cops on COPS cause a lot more physical harm than a stupid taser. Why should the cops go through all that trouble when they can just tase him. Looks pretty effective to me.
no, no they don't, sorry, they simply subdue the suspect in a manner in which anyone with minor training in hand to hand combat should be able to, especially tag teaming the person.
again, what "looks effective" to you is irrelevant.
Wow, making fun of someones spelling, real mature. This coming from a guy who can't spell taser.
LOL. both forms are acceptable.
as opposed to "pummel" which is not "pumble"
I'm not making fun of your spelling dude, I'm making fun of your vocabulary.
The guy was pushing and throwing his arms around. Like I said, why put up with all that trouble, just tase him, that's what it's for.
Name calling shows that you know you don't have a rational point.
wow, way to not list the "bodily harm" so bodily harm is a kick from a 19 year old?
gee, guess they should just shoot armed robbery suspects on sight, you know "why go to all the trouble" of questioning them?
and I call you names, not because of the rationality of my point, but because of the banality and frailty of your own.
so far, you have only been able to argue that it was ok to taze him because the alternative was "too much trouble"
gee, that sounds really rational doesn't it?
If you had a valid point, I would address it
no, you wouldn't be able to, it's too far beyond your obviously limited capabilities.
good try though, keep reaching for those stars.
So can a choke hold. A taser is a non-lethal way to subdue someone. It's a lot cleaner and less effort on the part of the cop.
LOL, again, no.
you're obviously talking about things you have no understanding off and again, the only argument you can put forward is that it's "less effort"
and your definition of clean is also flawed, as anyone experienced in combat would call subduing a suspect without employing any type of weapons "clean" as opposed to your definition.
which happens to be wrong.
that's a bizarre response considering my statement is true.