Because the last Stand Is a terrable X-Men film.As a followup to one of greatest comic book films of all time(x2) It fails miserably.Bryan Singer was setting up Phoenix as expansion of Jean grey's powers not the split personality of the Last Stand.
Yeah, the general audience never have any idea about that kind of thing. The only thing that works in making it clear is full reboots like Batman Begins. Anything else always leads to confusion. I've had so many of these discussions with people on different comic films.Ahhhh X continuity.
People can follow X Men first class being connected to all the X films if they want. Theres no way that a general audience member would know X3 is excluded or Wolverine. Who knows, they might even choose to loose connection to X1 in future First Class sequels.
Who cares as long as the films are good and FC continues its own story and continuity.
Mr. Sinister please!
^ Why exclude the third, since X2 sets up X3..?
I don't know too much about Mr Sinister I know he looks abit vampiric n that so how do u reckon they"d do him? Does he have a human looking alter ego or anything?
Mister Sinister is Nathaniel Essex a 19th Century victorian Scienstis obsessed with Mutants who was mutated by Apocalypse. His the leader of The Marauders and Nasty Boys.
Sinister has assumed many alter egos throught his life including Robert Windsor, Arnold Bocklin, Mike Milbury, Steven Shaffran, Edmond Atkinson, Nate, Administrator Pearson, Nosferatu, Nathan Milbury and Pale Man.
The problem with his character is that Sebastian Shaw was given some of his characteristics and backstory in First class making Mister Sinister some what redundant.
There is a mutant like a vampire called Emplate but I don't think he would make a great villain for the first class sequel.
I hink that role would be better suited to Mystique.