DarkKnight88
Avenger
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2002
- Messages
- 13,066
- Reaction score
- 12,201
- Points
- 103
*grabs DarkKnight88 by the lapels*
BECAUSE!!!![]()
Ah, that makes sense.
Then I fancast Clint Eastwood.
*grabs DarkKnight88 by the lapels*
BECAUSE!!!![]()
Yeah BCS is an anomaly. I'll throw Fargo season 2 in there as well (which reminds me I still need to watch Season 4. And of course there are other good or great prequels. But for every BCS there's waaaaaay more bad prequels. I don't mind sequels, reboots, etc. but prequels always seem way harder to get right.Better Call Saul is probably one of the best if not the best prequel out there because it focuses on world building with some of the memorable supporting characters from Breaking Bad as opposed to taking the more basic route of a prequel and making it about Walter White while he was still just a regular guy, which we had already seen enough of throughout BrBa, particularly the earlier seasons. It's all about execution.
Oh God. Yeah.I remember when there was talk of a Die Hard: Before John Was Hard prequel. Is that still happening?
Well that feels like a stretch.Ah, that makes sense.
Then I fancast Clint Eastwood.
I think the estate of Roald Dahl owns the film rights to that and it's a tricky situation because he was so disappointed by the 1971 film that he refused to have the sequel adapted to film. Go figure, since the Gene Wilder version is largely beloved. It's another Stephen King/Kubrick's Shining situation where the author hated the film. I'm guessing those rights are still in limbo otherwise they would have fast tracked Great Glass Elevator to follow Burton's Charlie and the Chocolate Factory since that was a big hit for WB.Though a prequel is just dumb anyway. Adapt the sequel Great Glass Elevator you cowards!
I think there were a number of things Dahl didn't like about it ranging from the fact that it was a musical to the casting choice of Wilder. If I'm being honest, I don't really blame Dahl since it does have a LOT of creative differences from the book. I know a lot of people aren't fond of Burton's version but the truth is that his is more faithful to the book (questionable Depp portrayal aside). But besides that, Willy Wonka wasn't a big hit when it first came out. It kind of became popular with later generations of kids thanks to TV and home video viewings.Never heard that about Dahl. That’s a shame. The Wilder film was great, but original authors don’t always share the same opinions of the masses.
I think there were a number of things Dahl didn't like about it ranging from the fact that it was a musical to the casting choice of Wilder. If I'm being honest, I don't really blame Dahl since it does have a LOT of creative differences from the book. I know a lot of people aren't fond of Burton's version but the truth is that his is more faithful to the book (questionable Depp portrayal aside). But besides that, Willy Wonka wasn't a big hit when it first came out. It kind of became popular with later generations of kids thanks to TV and home video viewings.
*Incidentally, I know I look like some kind of Wonka historian based on my avatar but that's just coincidental since I wanted to make the comparison of the year 2020 being similar to the boat ride from the 1971 movie. I guess I'm due for a new avvy.![]()
I just think Dahl was against Wonka not being played by a British actor. Which is funny since Depp and Chalamet are Americans too. Come to think of it, it's strange that Depp didn't use a British accent for Wonka considering the character was presumably English in the film. I guess they wanted to distance him from Jack Sparrow a bit.Yeah, I knew they changed quite a bit for that version and I figured that was why Dahl had issues but I’m surprised he was against Wilder too. I thought everyone liked his performance at least a little. Then again, supposedly Tom Clancy hated Harrison Ford’s Jack Ryan.
I just think Dahl was against Wonka not being played by a British actor. Which is funny since Depp and Chalamet are Americans too. Come to think of it, it's strange that Depp didn't use a British accent for Wonka considering the character was presumably English in the film. I guess they wanted to distance him from Jack Sparrow a bit.
I just think Dahl was against Wonka not being played by a British actor. Which is funny since Depp and Chalamet are Americans too. Come to think of it, it's strange that Depp didn't use a British accent for Wonka considering the character was presumably English in the film. I guess they wanted to distance him from Jack Sparrow a bit.