What do YOU think the 3 MCU movies will be in 2020?

[flickchick85]

I'm personally crossing my fingers for Namor, Nova, She-Hulk or Spider-Woman. But I figure at least one of them will be another group title, so maybe Runaways.

 

[0604854]

I'm personally crossing my fingers for Namor, Nova, She-Hulk or Spider-Woman. But I figure at least one of them will be another group title, so maybe Runaways.

I actually doubt runaways I know they have a script but it looks made for TV to me, Nova has more chance as a member of GOTG, Spider-woman and She-Hulk possible but not likely in my view. I think Marvel would be crazy not to consider Blade. For a team depending on what happens with the rights then the Fantastic 4 would be an option, I would prefer though the Midnight Sons.

 

[meanmc]

I thought about it again, and i think, they have something special in mind (to release these three dates already now).

That means, i think we will see "Doctor Stange 2" in 2019 (Feb. 2020), we still will see "Spiderman 2" in July 2020, but i am pretty sure, that in May or Novembre we will see a surprise. One of the dates will be for "Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3".

I could be totally wrong, as they surely also did not announce the movies because they want to wait how "GotG Vol. 2" (does in the big May-spot), and how the new "Spiderman" and "Doctor Strange" do in their first outings.

But i think, they will switch their schedule again if "Doctor Strange" works. So maybe we see the "Inhumans" go to 2020. And that is the "the surprise"...

 

[NHawk19]

At this early stage I'd say even Marvel isn't 100% on what those 3 films are.

I'd like to think based on what we have established prior to IW the most likely options are 2 of these 5:

GOTG 3
Capt Marvel 2 - Timing wise this seems like the longest shot.
Dr. Strange 2
Black Panther 2
Ant Man 3

The third depends on the fallout from IW. Marvel may be going more cosmic and wanting some new characters in the mix so they don't wear the others out. That could bring:

Nova
if the talks with Fox are to be believed:
Silver Surfer
FF4 - could really fit well here but that's really close to when the last one was made.

Movie #3 really does seem to be the wildcard slot though.

Could also be something tied to Inhumans but I'm starting to wonder about that movie given how much AoS is doing right now.

 

[KingCheops]

A full-on terrigen mist being released throughout the earth creating "mutants" (in place of inhumans if Marvel gets the rights back) may also occur in the wake of Infinity War.

Spoiler

Someone needs to catch up on their Agents of SHIELD.

I'm personally crossing my fingers for Namor, Nova, She-Hulk or Spider-Woman. But I figure at least one of them will be another group title, so maybe Runaways.

If She-Hulk is going to show up anywhere it should be Netflix. The tie-ins of having the 2 New York attorneys is too alluring.

 

[BarryAllen]

Guardians 3, Doctor Strange 2 (or possibly Midnight Sons), and Spider-Man 2.

 

[flickchick85]

If Marvel's looking for more cosmic titles, what they've done with the new Ultimates book might not be a bad way to go. For those who haven't read it, it's Black Panther leading a bunch of cosmic powerhouses - Captain Marvel, Blue Marvel, Monica Rambeau (Spectrum) and America Chavez (Miss America) - as a team designated to seek out the really big cosmic threats before they become a problem for Earth. In the first issue they go find Galactus to help solve HIS problems so that he doesn't come for us in the future. For the movies, this could play like an Avengers: Cosmic Division type of franchise, as every member of this team is far more powerful than any of the GotG, so it would have a really different flavor than that, imo, and it would certainly make sense for Earth to want a bigger cosmic defense strategy after the Infinity War. Plus, it would give the MCU another team to send some Avengers to, as that franchise is inevitably gonna be getting pretty crowded before too long.

 

[NHawk19]

^ That's part of why I think F4 would actually be a really good fit. (even if they don't go straight to DOOM) But if they don't get them back then you're right they have plenty of other options.

Honestly I think the name of the game for them at this point needs to be a little bit more diversity in their products. They've done so well with "Superhero" but only just dabbled in "Space", now they're trying "Magic" I'd like to see them try maybe a comedy in Squirrel Girl or something more dramatic on the big screen. Runaways could really work here but Marvel may have to lay a little ground work for The Pride. Maybe they're the ones who work for Thanos, or a sect of Hydra before Hydra adopted that name. AoS did just establish they've been around for thousands of years prior to Red Skull, and has Pagan ties.

3 films a year seems like it would keep them from burning out, and the TV shows keep everything in front of people year long. Maybe the model just needs to be refined to 2 established and 1 spin-off or new product, or 1 established, 1 spin-off, 1 new.

Now they just have to get the movies to acknowledge the TV shows without it being completely forced or out of place.

 

[harryoscop]

I'll give it a shot:

- GOTG 3
- Spider-Man 2 (Co-production between Marvel & Sony)
- Fantastic Four (Timing of the announcement is too great & Fox will never make another FF)


Full Phase 4 line up:

- GOTG 3
- Spider-Man 2
- Doctor Strange 2
- Black Panther 2
- Fantastic Four
- Captain Marvel 2
- Ant-Man 3
- Runaways
- New Avengers

 

[meanmc]

I'll give it a shot:

- GOTG 3
- Spider-Man 2 (Co-production between Marvel & Sony)
- Fantastic Four (Timing of the announcement is too great & Fox will never make another FF)


Full Phase 4 line up:

- GOTG 3
- Spider-Man 2
- Doctor Strange 2
- Black Panther 2
- Fantastic Four
- Captain Marvel 2
- Ant-Man 3
- Runaways
- New Avengers

That is the question - are the 2020 movies phase 4 or still phase 3?
As i know, they said "it is an update to phase 3".

Are they still doing phases in the future?

to your list:

I do not like to see "Runaways" on the big screen, and i am not sure, if we see "Ant-Man 3".
"Fantasic Four" would be great... if Fox does not make any more movies, we will see them definitly in the MCU.

And i think, we will probably see some "team up" movies or "vs." movies...
As well as - maybe - some "Spiderman Spin-offs"... (but maybe not in the MCU, but with Sony - yes)

What i am interested to see would be a "Hydra"-movie, from WW 2. Of course also with Captain America in a minor role.

It is difficult to predict phase 4. I would go with a few movies 100%:

- Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 (if its not in phase 3)
- Doctor Stange 2 (if its not in phase 3)
- Spiderman 2 (if its not in phase 3)
- Fantastic Four (if they get the rights back)
- Black Panther 2
- Inhumans 2
- Captain America 4
- Thor 4
- Iron Man 4
- Spiderman 3
- Avengers 4+5
+ a movie about a group of villians (Sinister Six or something - hope Hydra)
+ maybe a "Hulk" movie, within a team or "vs." or really a "stand-alone"
+ maybe "Guardians of the Galaxy 4"

Phase 4 could be around:

- Kree/Skulls war
- Hulk (as bad guy)
- Spiderman

 

[0604854]

Probably unlikely but how about, The sentry then the next Avengers movie could Avengers: The Void. Not going to happen but we can live in hope.

 

[meanmc]

Probably unlikely but how about, The sentry then the next Avengers movie could Avengers: The Void. Not going to happen but we can live in hope.

Like to see Sentry!

 

[Dasher10]

Why are so many people here not expecting Iron Man and Hulk sequels? Iron Man 3 grossed over a billion on its own and we haven't had a Hulk film since 2008. The third film is either Black Widow or Fantastic Four.

 

[Eddie]

Because Robert Downey Jr would have to renew his contract (they had to do a very expensive extension as is) and Ruffalo has implied a Hulk solo is probably quite a way off. Neither is impossible, but they're hardly the smart money at the moment.

 

[MbJ]

Why are so many people here not expecting Iron Man and Hulk sequels? Iron Man 3 grossed over a billion on its own and we haven't had a Hulk film since 2008. The third film is either Black Widow or Fantastic Four.

It has been said multiple times that there are issues with Marvel making a solo Hulk film because of Universal. The first movie also didn't do very well at the box office.

Like Black Widow and Hawkeye, they are going to keep Hulk as a team-up character.

 

[Mike5575]

I thought about it again, and i think, they have something special in mind (to release these three dates already now).

That means, i think we will see "Doctor Stange 2" in 2019 (Feb. 2020) we see the "Inhumans" go to 2020.

No way is Dr Strange being made in Feb 2019(within a month of Captain Marvel.). If anything, Dr Strange will take The Inhumans spot, or wait until 2020.

That is the question - are the 2020 movies phase 4 or still phase 3?
As i know, they said "it is an update to phase 3".

Are they still doing phases in the future?

to your list:

I do not like to see "Runaways" on the big screen, and i am not sure, if we see "Ant-Man 3".
"Fantasic Four" would be great... if Fox does not make any more movies, we will see them definitly in the MCU.

And i think, we will probably see some "team up" movies or "vs." movies...
As well as - maybe - some "Spiderman Spin-offs"... (but maybe not in the MCU, but with Sony - yes)

What i am interested to see would be a "Hydra"-movie, from WW 2. Of course also with Captain America in a minor role.

It is difficult to predict phase 4. I would go with a few movies 100%:

- Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 (if its not in phase 3)
- Doctor Stange 2 (if its not in phase 3)
- Spiderman 2 (if its not in phase 3)
- Fantastic Four (if they get the rights back)
- Black Panther 2
- Inhumans 2
- Captain America 4
- Thor 4
- Iron Man 4
- Spiderman 3
- Avengers 4+5
+ a movie about a group of villians (Sinister Six or something - hope Hydra)
+ maybe a "Hulk" movie, within a team or "vs." or really a "stand-alone"
+ maybe "Guardians of the Galaxy 4"

Phase 4 could be around:

- Kree/Skulls war
- Hulk (as bad guy)
- Spiderman

Don't forget a Captain Marvel sequel. That is certainly way more likely than a boring WW2 Hydra movie.

On top of that, the movies will end at trilogies. Feige stated that Infinity War would mark the end of The Avengers lineup as we know it. Don't expect a Cap 4 or IM4 unless one or more of the phase 3 movies flop.

There will be no Hulk movie. TIH was Marvel's only flop and Marvel doesn't own those rights.

 

[Dasher10]

1. I'm not sure if Marvel aren't going to do something with Black Widow.

2. If Thor: Ragnarok does well and Marvel and Universal are both interested in a Hulk sequel, I could still see it happening. I believe that Universal's rights are on a ten year timer and Marvel should get their distribution rights back in mid-2018 if Universal don't want to start filming for a Q4 2018 release.

3. Downey got an extension to his contract for Age of Ultron and Infinity War, and then scored $50M to play the villain in Civil War. If Marvel are willing to pay that much for him in an ensemble role, then they may as well give him one last solo film just for the sake of closure.

 

[meanmc]

No way is Dr Strange being made in Feb 2019(within a month of Captain Marvel.). If anything, Dr Strange will take The Inhumans spot, or wait until 2020.

I wrote Feb. 2020
(or 2019, but not Feb., but Nov.)

Don't forget a Captain Marvel sequel. That is certainly way more likely than a boring WW2 Hydra movie.

On top of that, the movies will end at trilogies. Feige stated that Infinity War would mark the end of The Avengers lineup as we know it. Don't expect a Cap 4 or IM4 unless one or more of the phase 3 movies flop.

There will be no Hulk movie. TIH was Marvel's only flop and Marvel doesn't own those rights.

Yes, i thought about "Captain Marvel 2", but i am - same with "Ant-man 3" - not sure, if we really will see a sequal. It can happen - yes, but i am not sure, if the character - both (Ant-man) - can be used for a trilogie.
Captain Marvel is very strong, i do not see her "earth-bound". If they go somewhere else with her - sure.
Therefore i did not mention "Captain Marvel 2" (and "Ant-Man 3")

Why do you think a "Hydra" movie would be boring?
The history of Hydra, with all the big villians, WW 2, Captain America with a minor role. I would love it...
(I know, that it is pretty unlikely - but therefore it is " a wish" )

What does it mean "End of the Avenger line-up as we know it"?
That means for sure not, that every Avenger in "Infinity War 1+2" will leave the team. There would be no superhero anymore around to build the Avengers.
Therefore, there have to be some "old ones" around. Do not think, that we will see (in phase 4) a completely new build-up for a new Avenger group (as you still have people like Black Panther, Spiderman, Captain Marvel, Doctor Strange).
And at the end - it will not work, if you kick out Hulk, Iron Man, Thor AND Captain America.
Do not think, that they will do it!
AND - Chris Evans said already, that he like to stay.
Chris Hemsworth is also still cheap, and is not desinterested.
Just RDJ could be a problem, but there should be no problem to give him 70-80 Mio if the movie makes 1 billion.
And, just look at the outtakes of "Ant-Man" - they are "showing" the 10 rings. Would say, that is a small hint (for "Iron Man 4")

Hulk - Marvel has the rights
They just do not have the distribution rights, and therefore they would have to share the money.
Therefore it does not make any sence to make a "Hulk" movie, as they would earn the same money with - i think - any other property.

But, as seen with Spiderman, and maybe Fantastic Four, that could change quickly. If they buy the distribution rights back, or get it back "somehow", they could do a Hulk movie within 2 years. They have a idea for such a movie for sure already in mind.
Then, the CGI cost would be the only problem.

 

[Slushy]

Iron Man 4
Blade 4
Ghost Rider

1. Moon Knight
2. Moon Knight and Friends
3. The Amazing Adventures of Moon Knight

I like your style.

 

[Eddie]

A Hydra history movie is likely out as we're actually getting the secret history of Hydra over on Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. now. It was a big part of the last episode, and it will continue to be fleshed out over there.

 

[Mike5575]

Yes, i thought about "Captain Marvel 2", but i am - same with "Ant-man 3" - not sure, if we really will see a sequal. It can happen - yes, but i am not sure, if the character - both (Ant-man) - can be used for a trilogie.
Captain Marvel is very strong, i do not see her "earth-bound". If they go somewhere else with her - sure.
Therefore i did not mention "Captain Marvel 2" (and "Ant-Man 3")

Ok, I really have no clue what you're talking about here. Captain Marvel is strong but you don't see her "earth-bound?" I don't get it.

You mentioned a sequel for Doctor Strange, Spider-Man, Black Panther, and heck, even the Inhumans. What makes you so sure that those movies would get sequels and not Captain Marvel? I mean, at least Captain Marvel is an Avenger, unlike The Inhumans. The simple truth is, that if the movies are good and people watch them, they will get sequels, it's as simple as that.

Why do you think a "Hydra" movie would be boring?
The history of Hydra, with all the big villians, WW 2, Captain America with a minor role. I would love it...
(I know, that it is pretty unlikely - but therefore it is " a wish" )

Hydra: An evil version of Shield. That would be boring. I wouldn't want to see a Shield movie, so why would I want to see a movie about Shield? Save all that Hydra stuff or Agents of Shield.

What does it mean "End of the Avenger line-up as we know it"?
That means for sure not, that every Avenger in "Infinity War 1+2" will leave the team. There would be no superhero anymore around to build the Avengers.
Therefore, there have to be some "old ones" around. Do not think, that we will see (in phase 4) a completely new build-up for a new Avenger group (as you still have people like Black Panther, Spiderman, Captain Marvel, Doctor Strange).
And at the end - it will not work, if you kick out Hulk, Iron Man, Thor AND Captain America.
Do not think, that they will do it!
AND - Chris Evans said already, that he like to stay.
Chris Hemsworth is also still cheap, and is not desinterested.
Just RDJ could be a problem, but there should be no problem to give him 70-80 Mio if the movie makes 1 billion.
And, just look at the outtakes of "Ant-Man" - they are "showing" the 10 rings. Would say, that is a small hint (for "Iron Man 4")

Have you even seen a Marvel movie since Avengers? Since that movie, the following Avengers have been introduced:

Scarlet Witch
Vision
Ant-Man.

With Phase 3, Marvel will introduce Doctor Strange, Black Panther, Spider-Man, Wasp, and Captain Marvel. That is more than enough heroes to make a new Avengers team. Come to think of it, that's 5-6 heroes with their own movie, compare that to only three heroes with their own movie with Cap, Thor, and IM. Basically, if the new heroes' movies make money, there won't be a need for Cap, Thor, or Iron Man anymore. The only ones I see sticking around are maybe The Hulk, and possibly Black Widow.

Here's my New Avengers Team:

Captain Marvel(Leader)
Black Panther
Ant-Man
Wasp
Scarlet Witch
Spider-Man

Here's my alternate version:

Captain Marvel(Leader)
Black Panther
Vision
Scarlet Witch
Spider-Man
Ant-Man.

See? We don't need the old heroes. They aren't the only Avengers. I want to see the focus shifted to a new generation of heroes. Besides, The actors are getting old, and they can't recast unless Marvel wants to reboot the Marvel Universe, which won't happen.

Hulk - Marvel has the rights
They just do not have the distribution rights, and therefore they would have to share the money.
Therefore it does not make any sence to make a "Hulk" movie, as they would earn the same money with - i think - any other property.

Same difference. I didn't make the distinction, because like you said, what's the point of even having rights if you can't distribute the movie?

But, as seen with Spiderman, and maybe Fantastic Four, that could change quickly. If they buy the distribution rights back, or get it back "somehow", they could do a Hulk movie within 2 years. They have a idea for such a movie for sure already in mind.
Then, the CGI cost would be the only problem.

It's possible, but Hulk is a tough character to make a movie off of. Besides, it's Marvel's only flop. Why would Marvel make a film off an already established character in the MCU. Marvel doesn't want to lose money. If Marvel were to buy F4 back, I wouldn't see them making the movie anytime soon. They would at least have to wait for the franchise to cool off. The Fantastic 4 has been seen nothing more than a failure in the eyes of the public. Every movie has sucked. If anything, I see Marvel using the tie-in characters before they even using the F4. People who think that Marvel will introduce the F4 during IW or even as one of those standalone films in 2020 are deluding themselves.

 

[meanmc]

A Hydra history movie is likely out as we're actually getting the secret history of Hydra over on Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. now. It was a big part of the last episode, and it will continue to be fleshed out over there.

Ah, thanks!

 

[meanmc]

Ok, I really have no clue what you're talking about here. Captain Marvel is strong but you don't see her "earth-bound?" I don't get it.

Look, it is the same problem as with Superman. She is - maybe - way to strong to have three movies "earth-bound".
It is just an idea...
Who should she fight against?
If they go in space with her - sure!!

You mentioned a sequel for Doctor Strange, Spider-Man, Black Panther, and heck, even the Inhumans. What makes you so sure that those movies would get sequels and not Captain Marvel? I mean, at least Captain Marvel is an Avenger, unlike The Inhumans. The simple truth is, that if the movies are good and people watch them, they will get sequels, it's as simple as that.

That`s right. If the movie is good, we will see a sequal - but that was not my point. I think it will be difficult to have many stand alone Captain Marvel movies "earth-bound".
But they would find a way - yes!

Hydra: An evil version of Shield. That would be boring. I wouldn't want to see a Shield movie, so why would I want to see a movie about Shield? Save all that Hydra stuff or Agents of Shield.

Okay!
I know many people who are interested in WW2. And i know, that they therefore would be interested in a Hydra movie - playing during WW2.
But that is just my position... no problem!

Have you even seen a Marvel movie since Avengers? Since that movie, the following Avengers have been introduced:

Scarlet Witch
Vision
Ant-Man.

With Phase 3, Marvel will introduce Doctor Strange, Black Panther, Spider-Man, Wasp, and Captain Marvel. That is more than enough heroes to make a new Avengers team. Come to think of it, that's 5-6 heroes with their own movie, compare that to only three heroes with their own movie with Cap, Thor, and IM. Basically, if the new heroes' movies make money, there won't be a need for Cap, Thor, or Iron Man anymore. The only ones I see sticking around are maybe The Hulk, and possibly Black Widow.

Yes, but you wrote something like "it will all change" - but it changed already NOW! It will always change - but that does not mean, that all original Avengers will go! That was my point.
And, leaving the Avengers does not mean, there is no solo movie!

As i wrote - Evans wants to return, Hemsworth will cost around 5-6 mio per movie. (or less)
Only Johansson and RDJ would be a problem, as they get around 20 mio/70 mio ...In the end it is "just the money"!!!

Here's my New Avengers Team:

Captain Marvel(Leader)
Black Panther
Ant-Man
Wasp
Scarlet Witch
Spider-Man

Here's my alternate version:

Captain Marvel(Leader)
Black Panther
Vision
Scarlet Witch
Spider-Man
Ant-Man.

See? We don't need the old heroes. They aren't the only Avengers. I want to see the focus shifted to a new generation of heroes. Besides, The actors are getting old, and they can't recast unless Marvel wants to reboot the Marvel Universe, which won't happen.

Yes, no argument against it...
Just, that Evans and Hemsworth could and want return very easy!
And, it is the question, if keeping the "big 4" out works.
I do not think that it is naiv to say, that those 4 are - besides Spiderman - the Superheroes with the biggest fan base, or?
So the question would be "Why should DC make a whole phase without Superman, Batman, (Wonder Woman,) Green Lantern and Flash"? Also an Justice League movie without any of them??
And - if, would it work out the same way as with them?

Same difference. I didn't make the distinction, because like you said, what's the point of even having rights if you can't distribute the movie?

Okay. Do not know. They could make the movie they want - at least!

It's possible, but Hulk is a tough character to make a movie off of. Besides, it's Marvel's only flop. Why would Marvel make a film off an already established character in the MCU. Marvel doesn't want to lose money. If Marvel were to buy F4 back, I wouldn't see them making the movie anytime soon. They would at least have to wait for the franchise to cool off. The Fantastic 4 has been seen nothing more than a failure in the eyes of the public. Every movie has sucked. If anything, I see Marvel using the tie-in characters before they even using the F4. People who think that Marvel will introduce the F4 during IW or even as one of those standalone films in 2020 are deluding themselves.

Yes. I think there will be a point, where the fans will demand a Hulk movie!
And i think a Hulk movie is in almost every Top5 for future movies. Or?
So, maybe there is a great amount of interest around...

 

[Mike5575]

Look, it is the same problem as with Superman. She is - maybe - way to strong to have three movies "earth-bound".
It is just an idea...
Who should she fight against?
If they go in space with her - sure!!

That`s right. If the movie is good, we will see a sequel - but that was not my point. I think it will be difficult to have many stand alone Captain Marvel movies "earth-bound".
But they would find a way - yes!

If Marvel can make three Thor movies, then Marvel could easily make a trilogy off of Captain Marvel. On top of that, Carol is a more relatable. character. She is not a "god" and would be more nuanced. I don't think Marvel really knows how to write norse people other than having them being loud and boisterous. There are always ways of making a compelling story with extremely powerful superheroes. Not every problem can be solved by punching it.

Okay!
I know many people who are interested in WW2. And i know, that they therefore would be interested in a Hydra movie - playing during WW2.
But that is just my position... no problem!

Sure. There are many great WW2 movies, I just don't think too many people would be all that excited about seeing a WW2 made by Marvel. Besides, Marvel is usually weak when it comes to their villains. Making a movie about a bunch of non-powered Hydra goons bent on world conquest doesn't wouldn't sell.

Yes, but you wrote something like "it will all change" - but it changed already NOW! It will always change - but that does not mean, that all original Avengers will go! That was my point.
And, leaving the Avengers does not mean, there is no solo movie!

As i wrote - Evans wants to return, Hemsworth will cost around 5-6 mio per movie. (or less)
Only Johansson and RDJ would be a problem, as they get around 20 mio/70 mio ...In the end it is "just the money"!!!

My comments were based off of what Marvel said about The Avengers. Here are some more quotes:

And one of the things we love in the comics is that the roster is always changing. That new people are coming on to the team, and that you could pick up an Avengers book ten years later and you don't recognize people on the cover.

Yes, no argument against it...
Just, that Evans and Hemsworth could and want return very easy!
And, it is the question, if keeping the "big 4" out works.
I do not think that it is naiv to say, that those 4 are - besides Spiderman - the Superheroes with the biggest fan base, or?
So the question would be "Why should DC make a whole phase without Superman, Batman, (Wonder Woman,) Green Lantern and Flash"? Also an Justice League movie without any of them??
And - if, would it work out the same way as with them?

Yeah, so the roster is going to change. The only way this will not happen is if most of the phase 3 films bomb. Even that is extremely unlikely. Things will start to get stale having the same old heroes. It's time for a breath of fresh air. Sure, Batman and Superman should be in the Justice League, but come Infinity War, we would have already had 10 years of movies featuring the original six avengers. It's time to move on.

Oh, and if those older characters aren't part of The Avengers movies, then, there's really no point in giving them their own solo movie. Part of the reason these Marvel sequels make so much more than the originals is because of extra exposure in other movies. Iron Man in The Avengers movie lead to Iron Man 3's HUGE box office.

Evans is the most likely to return. Downey is getting too old, and Thor has been one of the most boring characters to get his own movie. He's the only one that doesn't seem to have much of a story arc.

Yes. I think there will be a point, where the fans will demand a Hulk movie!
And i think a Hulk movie is in almost every Top5 for future movies. Or?
So, maybe there is a great amount of interest around...

I think people demand a Black Widow movie more than they do a Hulk movie, tbh. The top 5 for future movies(in no particular order) are as follows:

1. Doctor Strange 2
2. Spider-Man 2
3. Guardians of The Galaxy 3
4. Black Panther 2
5. Captain Marvel 2

Every now and then, you get people wanting a Planet Hulk movie for some strange reason.

 

[Dasher10]

Something just hit me. Literally the only properties which wouldn't be better suited for TV which aren't extremely obscure that Marvel have yet to bring into the MCU are Ghost Rider and Eternals.

Power Pack, Avengers Academy and Runaways would all be better off as TV shows aimed at a younger audience so we can get some decent character development before the characters age out of their roles as opposed to recasting after every film or two.

She-Hulk, Shang Chi, Moon Knight and Blade are all able to be done on a TV budget and Thunderbolts would need such a large roster that it would be better suited for TV as well. And now that Elektra and Punisher are debuting on Netflix, it's safe to say that they're also going to be saved for TV.

And please stop bringing up Nova. He'd be better off with the Guardians when Guardians 3 hits.

For the record, yes, Marvel can cast. Hulk and War Machine were already recast. There's nothing saying that Marvel won't do so again. I for one would rather see Downey and Rufallo get one last film each before moving on.