What is it with these two pictures ?

[Batman*]

You've undoubtbly all seen this image on the web before

When I first saw it I thought it looked okay, classic Bond haircut and tuxedo, but I've since seen this image on the web

if above image doesn't work

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Bond-Craig.jpg

anyway, it looks like the same image but his hair is cut, can anyone explain this to me, why make two different versions of the same picure and why didn't they keep the longer hair from the first image, looks more Bondlike and is reminicant of Sean Connery.

 

[xwolverine2]

who cares............****

 

[Batman*]

What did you just call me you little punk ?

 

[Dope Nose]

the first is probably a publicity shot from before they started filming.

 

[Batman*]

Oh, too bad they didn't keep the haircut, its exactly like Connery's, and thanks for posting a real responce. Unlike the immature cur above you.

 

[DarthSkywalker]

the first is probably a publicity shot from before they started filming.

We have a winner. Just a pic to say "HERE IS YOUR NEW BOND". Nothing more.

 

[LastSunrise1981]

who cares............****

Was that really necessary?

 

[DarthSkywalker]

So much anger here.

 

[Dope Nose]

heh, yeah.

 

[xwolverine2]

What did you just call me you little punk ?

i didnt call you anything....... i just said f---

 

[Kevin Roegele]

I prefer this one.

 

[Agentsands77]

I prefer the newer image, myself. Better haircut, better look. To answer the thread's question - the longer-hair image is from before they started shooting, just as a promotional photo to accompany Craig's casting announcement.

Here's the full second image:

 

[MKO1234]

I prefer the second picture too

 

[Batman*]

i didnt call you anything....... i just said f---

Well it doesn't make much sense to just add f**k at the end of your post for no apparent reason.

 

[Golgo-13]

Ooohhh! xwolverine2 punked by a newbie.....

*runs and gets popcorn, and a good seat*

 

[SolidSnakeMGS]

who cares............****

Your usual contribution to anything....

Yeah, I like the 2nd pic a bit more.

 

[Jack Napier]

who cares............****

So are you the one that decides which threads are worthy and which ones aren't?

 

[Kevin Roegele]

In the first, he looks smoother and sharper. Elegant.

In the second, he looks like a military trained badass about to take out some serious trash.

 

[ROBOCOP CPU001]

in my opinion..

In the first..

daniel Craig with a gun..

In the second..

JAMES BOND

 

[The Trainman]

in my opinion..

In the first..

daniel Craig with a gun..

In the second..

JAMES BOND

Nice!

 

[M.E.H.Z.E.B]

who cares............****

They've been treating you badly at the anger management class, havent they?

Next time, keep your obscenities to yourself, and be a little more civil when addressing posts. Your immaturity, though amusing at times, is becoming a quandary.

 

[Danger Mouse]

I like the second pic better.

Bond looks snazzy with cuff-links. And shaven.

 

[Batman*]

in my opinion..

In the first.. daniel Craig with a gun..

In the second.. JAMES BOND

It's the exact opposite for me. Really, I can't understand what makes people think the short hair looks better. No offence or anything, this is a real question, what is it about the short hair that makes you think it's better than the longer hair ?

 

[ROBOCOP CPU001]

in the second his face looks more i don't know experianced.....if that means anything..the shorter hair suits craig...

 

[Kevin Roegele]

It looks like two different people to me. If I was told that one was Daniel Craig, and one was someone else, I'd believe them.

The 'Craig is dead' conspiracy theory begins here.