Iceburgeruk
Civilian
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2003
- Messages
- 974
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
The new bond film is meant to be about james bond starting out. But it features a modern day setting and judi dench once again as m. Some say this means it is a restart and others that each film of the bond series is a restart, with none of them being connected to each other.
In my opinion, surely the most logical answer is that bond is a name given to the agents who are 007.
This would explain the why bond is so quick to tell everyone his name and it would explain the dead bond wife bit from the end of on her majesty`s secret service and the begining of for your eyes only.
In On her majesty`s secret service George Lazenby`s Bond gets married and his blushing bride gets murdered by Blowfelt. At the begining of For Your Eyes only Roger Moore`s bond visits the grave of the deceased bond wife.
To me this ties it together perfectly as it explains the continuity reason why lazenby`s bond is in only one film. He cannot take the grief and quits the british secret service. Sean Connery`s Bond is hastily brought back in to replace Lazenby`s Bond while they screen for suitable permenant replacements. (Explaining the Connery bond`s return in Diamond are forever) Roger Moore`s bond character then we can assume was a close friend of Lazenby`s bond and thereby that is why he tends the deceased wife`s grave.
On wikipedia it also states that there is a continuity error in On her majesty`s secret service. Blowfelt doesn`t recognize James Bond even though he met him in the previous film You only live twice. The only disguise James Bond has is his ridiculous scottish attire. How then was Blowfelt unable to realise the man was James Bond?
This makes no sense if Lazenby and Connery`s James Bonds are the same man. He would recognize Bond instantly (Reguardless of impenetrable highland Kilt disguise.lol.).
This of course would not be a continuuity discrepancy if Connery`s bond and lazenby`s bond were seperate people. Blowfelt then would literally not have ever met him before. Blowfelt`s subsequent helicopter attack on roger moore then must have been for some grievance between moore`s bond and blowfelt.
I therefore believe taht each bond is a different agent, explaining how judi dench can be in it and how it can be bond`s origin in this new film.
In my opinion, surely the most logical answer is that bond is a name given to the agents who are 007.
This would explain the why bond is so quick to tell everyone his name and it would explain the dead bond wife bit from the end of on her majesty`s secret service and the begining of for your eyes only.
In On her majesty`s secret service George Lazenby`s Bond gets married and his blushing bride gets murdered by Blowfelt. At the begining of For Your Eyes only Roger Moore`s bond visits the grave of the deceased bond wife.
To me this ties it together perfectly as it explains the continuity reason why lazenby`s bond is in only one film. He cannot take the grief and quits the british secret service. Sean Connery`s Bond is hastily brought back in to replace Lazenby`s Bond while they screen for suitable permenant replacements. (Explaining the Connery bond`s return in Diamond are forever) Roger Moore`s bond character then we can assume was a close friend of Lazenby`s bond and thereby that is why he tends the deceased wife`s grave.
On wikipedia it also states that there is a continuity error in On her majesty`s secret service. Blowfelt doesn`t recognize James Bond even though he met him in the previous film You only live twice. The only disguise James Bond has is his ridiculous scottish attire. How then was Blowfelt unable to realise the man was James Bond?
This makes no sense if Lazenby and Connery`s James Bonds are the same man. He would recognize Bond instantly (Reguardless of impenetrable highland Kilt disguise.lol.).
This of course would not be a continuuity discrepancy if Connery`s bond and lazenby`s bond were seperate people. Blowfelt then would literally not have ever met him before. Blowfelt`s subsequent helicopter attack on roger moore then must have been for some grievance between moore`s bond and blowfelt.
I therefore believe taht each bond is a different agent, explaining how judi dench can be in it and how it can be bond`s origin in this new film.