daywalker2007
Sidekick
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2007
- Messages
- 1,329
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Once in a while there's this ungrateful task of explaining joeks and ironies to that "especially skilled" kind of posters:
Nolan didn't a exact replica of the bat-suit and yet it worked. The "replica formula" is not for 100% of movies. It also worked for X-Men.
Yes it was. Untill Burton came in 1989 and changed it forever by improving the original concept. Before 1989, Batman's suit was grey tights and blue mask and cape. Another example of how non replicas work very good.
Thats' why Singer just made little changes.
If you don't, then I applaud your honesty since you don't have anything to feel clever about.
Another ungrateful task due to my commitment with he "especially skilled audience": I don't really like Cesar Romero too much, but since my name is El Payaso I thought a clown would be nice but not anyone. Then, I didn't want it to be the comics Joker because it would have been too 'hey I'm a sicko, beware I feel identified with the Joker' an I didn't want Nicholson because it was too much about a specific movie.
Soyou see, Cesar Romero was ideal since it was a parodic image I am not engaged to (not big fan of the 60's TV series) and that you shouldn't take too seriously, which is something you totaly fail at, amongst many other things.
Whatever sexual reference fits you more.
I'm really not getting this Cesar Romero-rectum association. But sometimes our minds play tricks on us by seeing things we secretly long for that are not actually there and that we can't make. Your shrink can explain it better.
I think your shrink can explain it better to you.
After all, with an avatar like yours, it looks like you've been into rectum riding for many a year.