TruerToTheCore
Sidekick
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2008
- Messages
- 2,934
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Semantics.
It's part of the character. As soon as you make Krypton a place that "deserves to be blown up" and steal the humanity you loose.
Semantics.
It's part of the character. As soon as you make Krypton a place that "deserves to be blown up" and steal the humanity you loose.
Blade Runner > Star Wars.And I second that...
Byrne's Krypton on the big screen would be amazing.
Maybe even the best science fiction landscape on film since the better Star Wars vistas.
To be honest if this is to be a new movie with a new origin I kind of like Mark Goerner design for Krypton.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
me to...I do like these a lot.
Black Zodak said:Ok... If this "Reboot" ends up being an origin movie, and we (possibly) get to see Krypton in the film, what would you want the planet to look like? An cold ice world like we got in the old movies? An evolved planet similar to Earth? Like in the classic comic books (colorful and bright, with cities filled with art-deco towers?)
If you could choose the type of world you would want Krypton to look like, what type of world would you choose?
To be honest if this is to be a new movie with a new origin I kind of like Mark Goerner design for Krypton.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I want to see the Scarlet Jungle.
The reason Byrne's Krypton is tragic isn't soley because the planets demise but because they had become so cold and sterile. The planets death was the final closure to it. It was the motivation for Jor-El to rescue Kal-El and send him off to, hopefully, a better life.
You see, Krypton blowing up is sad because it could have been much more. It had the technology, it had the intelligence, it had Jor-El who could have been a champion of the return to greatness... but it's all lost now. Jor-El's one hope is that Kal-El will live the kind of life that bespeaks the kind of greatness that the father had hoped he could bring to Krypton. It's a more adult approach rather than having Kal-El spend his life crying over the death of a planet he never knew.
edit: NO TO THE CRYSTAL FOREST. What do Kryptonians eat? Quartz? Krypton has to have vegetation and animal life. Not just for food... but vegetation creates atmosphere... animals imply evolution...like how the Kryptonians evolved into men and women.
Your post crisis bias is showing, and its hysterical
Your post crisis bias is showing, and its hysterical
You know: No hope & dark & dystopia = realistic
![]()
Cheery & bright & colourful & utopia = realistic?
If you bring anything down to it's simplest terms, it's going to sound weak.
The fact is that there is more depth to the post crisis Krypton than the pre.
Post crisis Krypton has a long history of bare chested, vibrant warriors with deep passions. Those warriors were celebrated and honored. They lived very exciting lives. More exciting than Birthright. A very tactile society. Then, as time passed, Krypton became more technologically advanced. The culture of Krypton began to become less physical and more cerebral which led to that society becoming less passionate in the ways of life and more so in the ways of learning. What sounds like a good thing at first has it's repercussions.... that same advanced society begins to disdain the pursuit of love and extroversion in favour of a more restrained life. Lives that could be approved of by the extreme right wing on our world. It was a tragedy in that it gave up the very thing that makes us want to live.
So, having said that - let's see you rebut with pre crisis Krypton's history and facts.
Really...?
So it's more realistic for you to cry over a relative you never knew you had?
Or is it because the Krypton in that later version isn't the simplistic, 1950's science fiction of the Silver Age?
YOUR Pre-crisis bias is showing?
And, having grown up during DC's Silver Age, I think I have a pretty clear perspective on that period in comics history. I'll take the more well thought out origin every time.
Yes, I have a bias... toward writing with more depth. I didn't grow up just reading comics.
Cheery & bright & colourful & utopia = realistic?
If you bring anything down to it's simplest terms, it's going to sound weak.
The fact is that there is more depth to the post crisis Krypton than the pre.
Post crisis Krypton has a long history of bare chested, vibrant warriors with deep passions. Those warriors were celebrated and honored. They lived very exciting lives. More exciting than Birthright. A very tactile society. Then, as time passed, Krypton became more technologically advanced. The culture of Krypton began to become less physical and more cerebral which led to that society becoming less passionate in the ways of life and more so in the ways of learning. What sounds like a good thing at first has it's repercussions.... that same advanced society begins to disdain the pursuit of love and extroversion in favour of a more restrained life. Lives that could be approved of by the extreme right wing on our world. It was a tragedy in that it gave up the very thing that makes us want to live.
So, having said that - let's see you rebut with pre crisis Krypton's history and facts.