Thundercrack85
Avenger
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2009
- Messages
- 21,668
- Reaction score
- 8
- Points
- 33
It's a trilogy. They're not self-contained.
Use The Spectacular Spider-Man as a guide.
It's very sad to see it go so wrong for ASM. Absolute truth, I had tears in my eyes when I saw the full trailer for Amazing Spider-Man. He was wise cracking in the back of the cab, the swinging was practical and looked real, he was dodging bullets. Oh well.
Use The Spectacular Spider-Man as a guide.
This.Use The Spectacular Spider-Man as a guide.
It doesn't matter what the topic is, some of these people will take any and every opportunity to bash them, lol.Please none of the anti-ASM crap. It did do interesting, new things and borrow well from the source material as did Raimi's.
I like that.
What I think the Webb movies did well was that they actually hinted at other villains. With the Raimi film, each villain's backstory was confined to the movie they were in.
That's a good thing. You're watching a movie not a television episode.
No, it shows a lack of foresight, and a rather lack of imagination. Three lab accidents in a row? What are the odds of that?
I'm saying the movies should be self contained and have a beginning, middle and end. Three lab accidents has nothing to do with that.
It doesn't matter what the topic is, some of these people will take any and every opportunity to bash them, lol.
Anyways, it's a bit of a tough question, they really have used a lot already. Stay away from villains we've already used, don't try and re-do Gwen. If they're really going back to high school, then really delve into it and don't end it in one movie like both other series.
I agree with most everything you said, except I REALLY don't want them to avoid Gwen just because of Stone's preformance. Yes, she was perfect, but Peter's story NEEDS Gwen.It doesn't matter what the topic is, some of these people will take any and every opportunity to bash them, lol.
Anyways, it's a bit of a tough question, they really have used a lot already. Stay away from villains we've already used, don't try and re-do Gwen. If they're really going back to high school, then really delve into it and don't end it in one movie like both other series.
Exactly!I agree with most everything you said, except I REALLY don't want them to avoid Gwen just because of Stone's preformance. Yes, she was perfect, but Peter's story NEEDS Gwen.
Use The Spectacular Spider-Man as a guide.
It really irks me that great shows like Earth's Mightiest Heroes and Spectacular Spider-Man were canned and replaced by awful followups. I know in the case of SSM it was a rights issue, but it still doesn't make me feel any less bitter about it.
This.
But to add to that, the main template that Weisman/Cook used in making that show were the 5 C's: Contemporary, Cohesive, Classic, Coherent and iConic.
Ummm excuse me that's the 4 C's and an I. NAZI GRAMMAR ENGAGE!
All of this, and we'll have the Spider-Man movie we've always wanted. I think it's really cool that according to reports, this time around they're shining light on the struggles of being Peter at 15, but also being Spider-Man at 15, rather than the romance--it's going to be very refreshing, but they have to find a way to sort of sneak romance in as I think it'll feel weird to have a Spider-Man story with 0% romance.This.
But to add to that, the main template that Weisman/Cook used in making that show were the 5 C's: Contemporary, Cohesive, Classic, Coherent and iConic.
In other words, make changes to the source and update them for a new audience without losing what made those original stories so great in the first place.
Build up the world around Peter Parker and develop his many side characters both allies and villains (introduce them early and often), avoid the romance plague that was the central theme in the past 5 movies, show the origin in well-placed flashbacks, and properly present the duality between Peter and Spidey.
they have to find a way to sort of sneak romance in as I think it'll feel weird to have a Spider-Man story with 0% romance.