Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 7
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]333285[/split]
it's not really an opinion in terms of what a villain is. he was a torture protagonist, yes. villain, no.
Venom was done right in Spider-Man 3?
I'm...intrigued. Go on.
Because someone has to say it in the continuation thread: Venom was done right in Spider-Man 3.
I'd really like to see Electro or the Shocker, btw.
If they intend on using Venom again in this series, I think they should take notes from The Spectacular Spider-man. That was an excellent portrayal of Venom.
Now, I don't think Venom was quite done right in SM3. The whole revenge theme in my opinion was quite flawed in that one.
Let's not forget how Venom was treated in terms of looks, power, and threat level.
And you are...?ah, so you finally decided to come did you?![]()
Oooooh, yes, yes. That *****ebag. I should have knowni'd be Mobt:
Oooooh, yes, yes. That *****ebag. I should have known![]()
But yes, I got bored and thought I might as well show up here. Notice how I made my name easily recognizable to you guys.![]()
Ive said it once and ill say it again! I hope Webb gives us already established villains - the creation of Spider-Man should not usher in the age of the super-villain.
already established? you mean already used? that seems really boring to see the same villains that we saw not too long ago. though it is an odd choice of villains for the first one. Lizard and Proto-Goblin. curious to see where the storyline goes