Kid_Kaos said:
That way it would make more sense for a farmboy getting a highrated job at the biggest paper in the world.
Funny, I always assumed that Perry White gave Clark Kent a job at the Daily Planet for being a
damn good reporter.
The Incredible Hulk said:
the entire secret identity of Superman is aq huge leap of believability to begin with.
It all depends on how you look at it. Not to mention what version of the mythos you're looking at.
Take, for example, Donner's original Superman film, Mark Waid's Birthright, and Grant Morrison's All-Star Superman. All of these show a Kal-El who, as Clark Kent, goes out of his way to appear bumbling, timid, and less than sure of himself. Contrast that to Kal-El as Superman, a being who just exudes majesty and confidence even if he doesn't want to. When you look at it like that, the disguise becomes so much more than glasses - it becomes how people percieve Clark Kent in comparison to how they percieve Superman.
The Corpulent1 said:
It's not really a problem. Smallville's separate from the comics. End of story.
We're not talking about the comics. We're talking about the way the average American percieves the Superman mythos.
The show is supposed to be about a young Clark Kent learning about his powers and how to use them responsibly, while still dealing with the average things a teenager faces. For the first few (3 or so) seasons, it did this relatively well. People may complain about the inclusion of Lex Luthor, but the original incarnation of Superboy had the two as childhood friends, so that's actually a bit closer to the comics.
Anyway, the writers have started to add integral parts of the Superman mythos into the pre-Superman years - Lois Lane, Jimmy Olsen, the Daily Planet, Brainiac, Zod, etc. By doing this, the show continues to muddle the VERY DISTINCT line that Kal-El later draws between Clark Kent and Superman, and therefore makes what the viewer knows will happen to him later in his life less and less and less believable.