ShadowBoxing
Avenger
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2004
- Messages
- 30,620
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 31
Well I think it's true...it captured the flavor of that book. It's not X-Men, it's not Superman....some people think its suppose to be like Batman....not any Spider-Man I have ever read. The book has always been about Peter Parker and his f---ed up life more than its about how many times Doc Ock attacks him. All his defining events. Him quiting being Spider-Man, his marriage to Mary Jane, the life and death of Gwen Stacy, what happened to Harry (with drugs and becoming the Green Goblin) all came out of Peter Parker's life.Dynasty said:That's a great quote.
lol
In X-Men or Superman things tend to come at them (in the forms of aliens or evil maniacs and they step up to face them), in Spider-Man there tends to be an event in Peter Parkers life that creates a villian or a problem and then he must become Spider-Man to deal with it...it is far more personal. Spider-Man (unlike other heroes) doesn't want to be Spider-Man (addressed in number 2), he wants to be Peter Parker...so he puts on a front in the costume of how he feels a hero should act (addressed in 1 and 2). Furthermore it is a fairly light hearted, jovial comic.
I know a guy who hates Batman Begins, X-Men (1 and 2) for not being close enough to the comic (at least the heart of). He has double my collection (so about 10,000 comics) and he says Spider-Man is dead on (although he dislikes the story changes--however he dislikes all story changes).
It's about as close to Spider-Man as I have seen. I think the problem is most people view the 90s cartoon as Spider-Man, that was like Spider-Man but it was noticibly abscent in many ways. Spider-Man has more angst than that show did, it has more personal issues. I mean there are issues literally devoted the Peter Parker finding an apartment/job/going on a date, confronting his Aunt May, etc. Those were not there (in any great degree)...the cartoon was just action and no substance.