Why are fanboys so hard to please?

Most "fanboys" are very easy to please as long as you make a good film. There are few if any that know or even care about the characters enough to complain about inconsistencies. As long as the film is good you can rape the character to your hearts content.
 
its because of topics like this that we continue to get mediocre movies.

the whole "you should be glad they make movies, so dont bash them at all" mentality is really sad. The fact is, there are few truly good comic movie/franchises. Most of them are bad.Thats why fanboys bash them. Its as simple as that.

Changes in comic films can be accepted if they actually make sense. Thats why people dont really complain about organic webshooters anymore, or leather x outfits, or the black bat suit. On some level, they make sense. But killing off the leader of the x-men in a movie to give your already overhyped cash cow even more screen time? Giving Elektra lame superpowers when she didnt even need them? Making Dr. Doom have superpowers when the whole concept of the character is about is iron will and the fact that he earned most of the things he had? They're unnecessary changes.

And fanboys, probably in part not to look like the whiny sterotype society has put on them, let studios get away with crap like this. They accept that tim story will never take the FF to heights they deserve, and they're content on some average movies which will probably showcase jessica alba more than most of the team. They wont complain when Mark Steven Johnson gets another comic flick and runs that into the ground, cause hey, if they say anything, they'll be called whiny fanboys.

it's sad that if you're not superman, batman, spider man, or the x-men, chances are your comic movie will suck....but thats what happens when fanboys let hollywood run wild on lesser known characters

Man, you took the words right outta my mouth. I've always felt that every hero is someone's favorite and deserves the same respect as Spidey or Batman. It means as much to them to see their hero done right as it did for me to see that with Spider-Man. I'm optimistic that Marvel may be doing things right from what I've seen so far with Iron Man and the casting for the Hulk sounds good. I hope that these movies plus TDK will be awesome and set the standard for the next several years.

And MSJ should never be allowed near another Marvel property.
 
I'm not hard to please. If the movie is good, I am pleased, and if the movie is bad why should I be pleased?
I just dont want my favourite characters (among them Ghost Rider and Dardevil) to be wasted in bad movies, when the source material is so great.

The Batman pretty much says it like I feel it. The biggest mistakes usually centres around changing the source material, or even adding new elements (son of superman anyone?).
 
the comics DID have a "superman jr"character albeit a creative writing experiment on clark's part
 
yeah i know. and the last superboy may be considered supermans "son" the way he was potraited in teen titans (2003).

but still.. superman in the movies, man i just.. !!! it sucked, and we all agree on it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"