Why do girlfriends get more attention than swedish supermodel prostitutes?

Not everyone obsesses over motives when they're fulfilling sex fantasies with a hottie. Do you obsess whether a sexy girl is only having sex with you because you remind her of someone else when she's giving you a great BJ? Who cares?

Being attractive is a means to an end. So is money.
I'd much rather hang onto my soul, thanks.

Forming a real human connection with someone and exploring it to the fullest is one of the greatest things you'll ever experience. Why would you strive for something far less than that? That's not to say I'm against one-night stands or anything like that, but paying for it just seems like... cheating. Taking the easy way out. Not bothering to go through the "trouble" of seducing someone.
 
Yes many girls who go out on a Friday night just want a guy to bang their brains out and never call them again but many other women expect more than that from a guy attractive enough to warrant sex.
Not really, or if they do, the venue of Friday Night barscene isn't the place to meet him. There are plenty of abusive guys who enslave women into poor relationships because they can...but then those people aren't held above prostitution, there just aren't laws against them.
Guy's will say anything to get into a girls pants even if she wants a relationship and they don't intend to call her again once they get some tail.
Again, I don't know where you get this idea that guys routinely stalk the innocent virgin fawns of the world.
How can you excuse this behavior while attacking me for having an upfront exchange with a woman who's willing to give me something if I give her something.
No one excuses guys lying to girls about "wanting a relationship for sex", but honestly if you knew anything about the sex scene you'd realize that doesn't happen very often...if at all, in bars and clubs. One night stands are just that, one night stands. If a girl goes out to a bar hitting on those guys for a relationship then that's her problem, because she is totally in the wrong venue. Relationships come from the girls I talk to in the lunch room, I sit next too in class, I meet in a coffee shop...very low pressure places where people aren't concerned with 'getting laid'.
We both understand what the sex is with no illusions of a call back the next day.
I do, you don't. You think that the only time that happens is with prostitutes, or that one-night stands might as well be a prostitute. It's not though. One night stands actually involve me talking, interacting and listening to someone.
Yeah every one night stand involves two people who see eye to eye and don't expect a phone call the following day.
Pretty much yes. Unless it's rape, or alcohol is involved and you have no control over your actions...yes. There are guys who manipulate nice, wholesome girls into sleeping with them yes, but that's not what a one-night stand is...and no one here is defending guys who prey on women, except you, because that's exactly what prostitution is.
What planet are you from?
Earth
Plenty of girls and guys have sat next to the phone waiting for that person to call but it never does.
Not my fault. If you go out to a bar and flirt with a guy, flaunting your sex as a gateway to a relationship then you have serious problems. Ever seen Scrubs, the character of Elliot on the show is routinely made fun of for sleeping with guys to "start relationships" which all fail, I might add. The point of the joke is that you'd be foolish to do that. Women aren't somehow hypnotized into sleeping with men, they choose to, or are irresponsible enough to booze up and let their inhibitions drop...or they get rapped, which is a crime.
They got played and feel like ****e who never got paid.
Again this notion that guys just "play" innocent women into sex is absurd. You put pu**y on a pedestal. You act like we're all guilty of sexual deviance, and you just haven't stooped so low as to manipulate these innocent fawn women into sleeping with you. Guess what, if you're at a club with the thong hanging out the back of your pants you stopped looking for "a relationship" the moment you walked in the door.
A ****e? Fine, but so is anyone who has one-night stands or enjoys sex with strangers. Go tell them they shouldn't do it and they'll laugh in your silly, self-righteous face.
I never did, nor will. However there is a difference, a distinct difference between picking up a girl with your words and actions and slipping her a twenty and saying blow me. One requires mutual attraction, the other doesn't.
Yeah that's how everyone wants to be treated. To be lied to your face about why your partner really keeps you around.
There's that sexual frustration. Seeing boyfriends, all of them it seems, as liars and scumbags...we'll come back to this.
I don't treat escorts like scum/commodities. I treat them like professionals.
No, you pay for them to f*** you...that's treating them like a commodity. You want to know what they treat you like...a pervvy John, a way to feed their coke addiction...fun.
They know the score going in and going out.
That you're a perv they don't want to sleep with, but if they don't they'll get pimped slapped.
There's no waiting by the phone because one person wanted a relationship more than the other person did.
Again One-Night stands, while they CAN start relationships don't start under the dellusion that a relationship will come of it.
So it really is sexual frustration. You honestly think that's what men really think, the bulk of them...what Jag really thinks of his wife, what I think of my girlfriend, what my roomate thinks of his...wow, you are skewed.

I'm going to let you in on a secret, that's comedy. No guys who are in any successful long term relationships treats or thinks of their partner that way. If they do, then they are looked down upon by society. One night stands, relationships, marriage is reciprocle. I like someone who likes me back, I want to f*** someone who wants to f*** me. Prostitution is never reciprocle. Got it.

You think that's true because that's how you see women, as ******* machines. And you see relationships and interaction between us as just another form of payment...which is wrong. They aren't equal. Building attraction actually takes effort and actually requires for you to have emotions and treat people like human beings.
 
I like how at one point SB is totally sounding all erudite about relationships and then he says "ever seen Scrubs?"

LoL
 
200px-Johnmcginley4x18.jpg

"Look Nancy, as much as I'd like to hear you drone on about you're incredibly unfulfilling sex life, I have to go enjoy the insanely more pleasurable activity of cleaning out bedpans of patients with dysentery. So how about you march on back to your mother's basement and come back to me when you have something to say that doesn't make me want to see how far I shove que-tips in my ears"​
 
SB, give it up.

blind_fury won't even admit to any of us being right or even close to it. He will deny, deflect, ignore, stammer or refuse to answer questions.

In the end, yeah it's his life and he should live it as he should want it. I just don't understand with all the posts, threads he makes, why he won't answer simple questions.

*shrug*

Even I tire of this all, until later when I have to reread his other threads concerning the subject. :up:
 
His argument is NOT "run game" on women, treat them like ****s and never call them back. :rolleyesx1,00,000:

jag
 
blind_fury argues like my f**king girlfriend! He picks one term or phrase out of an entire explanation, takes it out of context, and then runs with it as his counterpoint. It's a terrible tactic and just shows that you don't have a leg to stand on and you know it. Just save what little face you have left and shut up, at this point that's the ONLY way you can come out ahead here.
 
So it really is sexual frustration. You honestly think that's what men really think, the bulk of them...what Jag really thinks of his wife, what I think of my girlfriend, what my roomate thinks of his...wow, you are skewed.
Look I made the distiction between girls I want to marry and hot chicks I just want to have sex fantasy with but you and your friends continue to ignore that.

I'm going to let you in on a secret, that's comedy. No guys who are in any successful long term relationships treats or thinks of their partner that way. If they do, then they are looked down upon by society. One night stands, relationships, marriage is reciprocle. I like someone who likes me back, I want to f*** someone who wants to f*** me. Prostitution is never reciprocle. Got it.
Prostitutes are motivated to have sex with you. It may not be because you have great body or because you remind them of George Clooney but they are motivated. And I'll let you in on a little secret these women can be better in the sack than a one night stand.

In other words, sex with a a skilled escort can be more enjoyable than so-called "reciprocle sex" with a one-night stand who's horrible in the sack? Who cares if you cuddle with a one-night stand if the the sex was horrible? What's was the point?

You think that's true because that's how you see women, as ******* machines. And you see relationships and interaction between us as just another form of payment...which is wrong. They aren't equal. Building attraction actually takes effort and actually requires for you to have emotions and treat people like human beings.
Escorts are not innocent victims, they're skilled professionals. They know the score. The one-night stand crying because a guy never called her back is the real victim and it happens more often then you're willing to admit. Prostitutes objectify men. They see them as ATM machines. We se them as sex machines. It's the same thing as sugar daddy-gold digger relationship but it's illegal and far more stigmatized. Are you going to tell a 50 year-old sugar daddy to stop buying his beautiful women gifts and find an average looking **** for a one night stand at a club because the sex is "reciprical"? :whatever:

He'll laugh in your silly, self-righteous face.

To summarize:

Women who do one-night stands aren't innocent victims?

Fine neither are professional escorts.

Sex with a one-night stand is always more enjoyable than sugar daddy-gold digger sex because it's more "reciprical"?

Total bulls--t.
 
blind_fury argues like my f**king girlfriend! He picks one term or phrase out of an entire explanation, takes it out of context, and then runs with it as his counterpoint. It's a terrible tactic and just shows that you don't have a leg to stand on and you know it. Just save what little face you have left and shut up, at this point that's the ONLY way you can come out ahead here.
Your not a fair judge of this debate because you're terribly biased.

I directly answer his points. He gives lame one-liners to respond to most of my arguments then for the finale goes on long tirade on how treating girls like ****s is only wrong when money is involved so he can get a "slow cap" from lemmings like yourself. So unless you can provide at least 3 examples of when I took his points completely out of context or have something to add to the debate itself, shut up and leave while your ahead.
 
Your not a fair judge of this debate because you're terribly biased.

I directly answer his points. He gives lame one-liners to respond to most of my arguments then for the finale goes on long tirade on how treating girls like ****s is only wrong when money is involved so he can get a "slow clap" (do you read your posts when you finish typing?) from lemmings like yourself. So unless you can provide at least 3 examples of when I took his points completely out of context or have something to add to the debate itself, shut up and leave while your ahead.

Go look up the word biased because I think you're misusing it. How am I biased? How am I a lemming?

I am not going to put forth any effort on your part because you know that you're grasping at straws. F**k 3 example I can probably find 3 f**king threads that have proved that you absolutely cannot provide any kind of credibility to your ridiculous statements. You have been asked FLAT OUT asked more times than I care to count about how you fund your activities given your personally stated schedule and lifestyle, and only now you come out and and make some flippant claim that you have unmitigated funds all of a sudden from a savings account you have made no mention of EVER before despite being posed with these questions from the very first time you ever made your claim. Then you back that up by saying that you don't have to prove anything to us and that you "don't care" what we think. Yet, you perpetuate this thread CLEARLY in attempt to get people to believe your story. If you truly didn't care you would have let it go by now and gone about your hooker f**king way, but you chose to sit here and b**ch and moan about how we're the SANCTIMONIOUS ones by saying that you are objectifying women, which you clearly are. (You should look up objectify while you look up biased and lemming.)

Shadow's "lame one-liners" actually come off as valid points to most of the posters bearing an IQ more than 2 digits. For you to call me a lemming is the funniest thing you've said since you claimed that people who religiously bang hookers are less likely to get STDs. You need to seriously think about what you are going to tout as truth before you post. There are ZERO people here that believe you. Not one, not a few, ZERO. The fact that you lack the ability to let this go and go about your personal life just solidifies the fact that you are lying. Only a liar would be so invested in proving himself right, rather than someone KNOWING the truth. If you were actually telling the truth, then you would have won already by proving us all wrong and going out a banging some more supermodel hookers, but then you wouldn't be able to spend your day online perpetuating your little fantasy.
 
Go look up the word biased because I think you're misusing it. How am I biased? How am I a lemming?

I am not going to put forth any effort on your part because you know that you're grasping at straws. F**k 3 example I can probably find 3 f**king threads that have proved that you absolutely cannot provide any kind of credibility to your ridiculous statements. You have been asked FLAT OUT asked more times than I care to count about how you fund your activities given your personally stated schedule and lifestyle, and only now you come out and and make some flippant claim that you have unmitigated funds all of a sudden from a savings account you have made no mention of EVER before despite being posed with these questions from the very first time you ever made your claim. Then you back that up by saying that you don't have to prove anything to us and that you "don't care" what we think. Yet, you perpetuate this thread CLEARLY in attempt to get people to believe your story. If you truly didn't care you would have let it go by now and gone about your hooker f**king way, but you chose to sit here and b**ch and moan about how we're the SANCTIMONIOUS ones by saying that you are objectifying women, which you clearly are. (You should look up objectify while you look up biased and lemming.)

Shadow's "lame one-liners" actually come off as valid points to most of the posters bearing an IQ more than 2 digits. For you to call me a lemming is the funniest thing you've said since you claimed that people who religiously bang hookers are less likely to get STDs. You need to seriously think about what you are going to tout as truth before you post. There are ZERO people here that believe you. Not one, not a few, ZERO. The fact that you lack the ability to let this go and go about your personal life just solidifies the fact that you are lying. Only a liar would be so invested in proving himself right, rather than someone KNOWING the truth. If you were actually telling the truth, then you would have won already by proving us all wrong and going out a banging some more supermodel hookers, but then you wouldn't be able to spend your day online perpetuating your little fantasy.

In other words:

You won't/can't back up your accusations and show 3 specific examples where I took SB's word's completely out of context.

You state prostitues have more stds than college students/girls at the club as if it's an established fact without posting any research to back it up.

And then you resort to attacking my character because you have no well-thought out stance on the debate itself and only serve as Shadow Boxing's biased cheerleeder.

Super. You can leave now.
 
In other words:

You won't/can't back up your accusations and show 3 specific examples where I took SB's word's completely out of context.

You state prostitues have more stds than college students/girls at the club as if it's an established fact without posting any research to back it up.

And then you resort to attacking my character because you have no well-thought out stance on the debate itself and only serve as Shadow Boxing's biased cheerleeder.

Super. You can leave now.

Nice try at acting superior but you are the last person on the planet to take the stance against making an argument without evidence. F**k that's your whole character isn't it? That how everyone knows you? The sad loser who lies about getting hookers?

At the start of my post I stated that I wasn't going to put forth any effort on your part. I am more than confident that the majority of the posters here know what I am referring to to I don't feel the need to physically bring it here. The fact that YOU can't say anything about what I said other than, "you don't have any research" just makes you look even more foolish. While other posters here may have thought that to be an impossibility at this point you never cease to amaze. Go ahead and perpetuate your little fantasy, I'll watch from my OWN HOME with my beautiful girlfriend and laugh at how sad and desperate for attention some people are.
 
I'm not dodging anything.

I summarized his long rant of baseless accusations and personal insults.

Unlike Shadow Boxing this guy has nothing to contribute to the debate itself.

What debate? It's a bunch of people telling you how full of crap you are and all you can muster is a pathetic "nuh-uh". This is no debate, it's a slaughter.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"