- BB tried to stay close to the comic books and it made less than SR.
- FF tried to stay close to the comic books and made less than SR.
- Sin city was exactly like the comic books and made less than SR.
The Spider-Man franchise stayed extremely close to the original comic books and made more money in it's lifetime than all these movies put together.
Oh Lord. Why is it you guys always use the stupid- BB tried to stay close to the comic books and it made less than SR.
- FF tried to stay close to the comic books and made less than SR.
- Sin city was exactly like the comic books and made less than SR.
Most of the people who watched the spider man movies don't even read comic books. So they don't know or care if the stories are faithful or not. I love spiderman but I'm pretty sure it's success is not based on how faithful it is.
Look at the Batman movie of 1989, that movie is even less faithful than SR and it made a lot of money.
It's not rocket science![]()
or this
emoticon. Just curious.it most certainly did for Sony... and we both know that the name of the game in the movie business is making money.
Oh Lord. Why is it you guys always use the stupidor this
emoticon. Just curious.
Batman Begins had to lure people back to see a Batman movie after Batman and Robin. It is a hightly respected film, and those who stayed away in the theater found it on DVD and Cable. It also made domestic over it's production budget. SR didn't. BB had good legs and was pulling in good numbers every week even against bigger films. SR made a lot of it's money in the first two weeks. After that, it was not making much because of bad WOM. Batman Begins constistently made more money in it's same week out from opening than SR did. There is very high experctation for The Dark Knight. It will make a lot of money this time.
Sin City cost nearly nothing to make. A lot of it was shot in Rodriguezes house for crying out loud.
Oh Lord. Why is it you guys always use the stupidor this
emoticon. Just curious.
Batman Begins had to lure people back to see a Batman movie after Batman and Robin. It is a hightly respected film, and those who stayed away in the theater found it on DVD and Cable. It also made domestic over it's production budget. SR didn't. BB had good legs and was pulling in good numbers every week even against bigger films. SR made a lot of it's money in the first two weeks. After that, it was not making much because of bad WOM. Batman Begins constistently made more money in it's same week out from opening than SR did. There is very high experctation for The Dark Knight. It will make a lot of money this time.
Sin City cost nearly nothing to make. A lot of it was shot in Rodriguezes house for crying out loud.
The Spider-Man franchise stayed extremely close to the original comic books and made more money in it's lifetime than all these movies put together.
so don't make this out to be SR is better than all of them, because it's not.
I don't hate Superman Returns. I LOVED IT!
Bryan Singer gave us some special homage from Richard Donner's and Christopher Reeve's Superman The Movie (1978) for Superman Returns. It was an honorable for Christopher Reeve. The story was good and it has an excellent epic. Loved the romance, dramatic and everything, especially airplane rescue scene.
true, but whatever Raimi was doing with his franchise, he was obvoiusly doing something rightBut the point wasn't that. It was about how faithfulness to the comics would somehow mean better numbers.
Btw, have you made any cent out of SR?
true, but whatever Raimi was doing with his franchise, he was obvoiusly doing something right
what?
Accuracy to the comic books means nothing, People forget how much comics have changed over time. B89 is more accurate than BB, depending on which era you look at. Hell, the campy Batman series is more accurate depending on where you take your batman from.
- BB tried to stay close to the comic books and it made less than SR.
- FF tried to stay close to the comic books and made less than SR.
- Sin city was exactly like the comic books and made less than SR.
Btw, have you made any cent out of SR?
Maybe it'd be helpful if you read the rest.
and yet it still did an underwhelming performance...Lighthouse said:SR also had more WW marketing, more theatrical openings, and an IMAX release over these other movies you've mentioned.
Owned.- BB tried to stay close to the comic books and it made less than SR.
- FF tried to stay close to the comic books and made less than SR.
- Sin city was exactly like the comic books and made less than SR.
Most of the people who watched the spider man movies don't even read comic books. So they don't know or care if the stories are faithful or not. I love spiderman but I'm pretty sure it's success is not based on how faithful it is.
Look at the Batman movie of 1989, that movie is even less faithful than SR and it made a lot of money.
It's not rocket science![]()
SR also had more WW marketing, more theatrical openings, and an IMAX release over these other movies you've mentioned(and SR still made less then BB domestically). I happen to agree about the overrated "faithfulness to comics" argument, but don't say "It's not rocket science" when clearly there are several complicated contributing factors to a movies box office.
I did, and I still don't understand what you mean... if you mean have I made money from Superman Returns, then no, but that has nothing to do with what we're talking about.
and yet it still did an underwhelming performance...
there was definitely something wrong with the movie. What was wrong is debatable, but there was something wrong.
IMO lack of action. And maybe something you've mentioned before kakarot, lack of bright colors. I love SR, but I understand some of you for not liking it. What really surprises me is how some people express about this movie, like if it's even worse than B & R, Superman III - IV, Daredevil. IMO that's going too far
It is going too far, but the reason fans feel that way sometimes is because they had a lot more invested in Superman Returns then in those movies. Movies like Ghost Rider and Batman & Robin were pure and absolute crap, but I was able to shrug them off and forget about them. SR is more disappointing to me than those movies because I really care about the Superman character, and Singer gave me a Superman that I felt absolutely no connection to. Is Superman Returns worse than Superman III and Daredevil? No, but it hurts more than those movies.
It must be really frustrating not getting the Superman movie you wanted. Maybe if there's a sequel it will be more the way you want a Superman movie.