• Super Maintenance

    Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates.

    Starting January 9th, site maintenance is ongoing until further notice, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into.

    We apologize for the inconvenience.

Sequels wtf happened to all 3 movies!?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LOBO1977
  • Start date Start date
L

LOBO1977

Guest
part one-
A- what was the whole point of having saber & his curiousity on wolverine's necklace and never explain? why was that in the movie? and they never did explain/resolve it in x2 like they did w/ wolverine's experiment of gaining the claws.
B- they should of shown the scene when jean loses it w/ senator kelly and pulls the folder towards her. and everyone gasp. and she reply' mr. kelly, you don't have to throw it, i'm right here.' and kelly just grin to himself as to say"she's one of them' but to himself.
C- and how the hell did magneto know about rogue's ability to absorb other's lifeforce? because in the beginning, how did saber know where to go after rogue up in canada? we know myst. had a habit of going into the mansion whenever she wanted to. we know xavier knew because of ceribral(spell?, i'm tired) but still. they should of shown a scene where the boy she kisses is in the hospital in comatuse and parents(or investigators) are questioning rogue. and myst. is in disguise as a nurse and overhears information about rogue. and how myst. knew to be in the hospital, she read a newspaper article about a young teenager girl kisses boyfriend into coma in the globe or one of those crazy tabloids that you see @ walmart/kmart.
:ghost:
x2
A- they should of put jubilee's deleted scene in there. it was great. wtf!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:eek: they should've previewed the sentinals in this one. as in where myst. is on the computer, and one page has a sketches from someone else and emails him the sketches and written on it, it says "yes or no, respond asap"
B- didn't we see gambit's name on one of those name list of mutants? look at the deleted scene w/ myst. and freeze it. its a southern name.
C- why show beast in that form of a human? was he in disguise for the tv show he was on?

x3-
A- the phoenix should've looked darker and scarier. i mean i love the look but they could've gone darker. and they should 'vd torn a few pieces each time she killed someone. like shredded pieces here and there. nothing big. and her hair should of lighted up on fire or something when phoenix came into place.
B- why 20 years ago? they should of said "25-27 years ago". because she looks to me like 38 years old. and scott looks like 28-29 years old( i think like angel's age).
C- angel's part in the movie. i expected more. i thought he was going to suit up and help x-men. i mean he did but i wish he couldn've done more.
D- if leech was the cure, why didnt they move him closer to the phoenix to slow her down?
E- the cure, is it only temporary? i think it is, if so then rogue & myst., will they get they're mutation back.
F- where the f u c k is jubilee!!!!!!?????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
there are tones and tones of continuity holes, i have been barking up these since the beginning, it is frusterating at times, they say it can't be perfect, but Spiderman is almost flawless why can't they have made it like that? these quesitons will never be answered so i have learned to not let it bug me that much any more

i just look at it like, Ultimate X-men is way different then the Uncanny X-men, and they are both different tellings then the Astonishing X-Men, so i look at these like the Singer X-Men, because well over 3/4ths of the translation errors, are really artistic liberties he felt like he could make because the movie wouldn't work if they would have done it like it was written, when again, spiderman is about as dead on as you could be, and there is no one complaining there..

Wolverines memory, disregarding half of what most people recognize rouge as, not worring about storm being african, throwing aside Cyclops, and the lackluster action are all descions Singer has claimed where his in various Interviews/ commentaries

yeah it's easy to complain, but i don't hate these movies, and i enojy them alot so whatever
 
i'm sorry long shot. its 3:27am and i'm tired. and yes, i do louuve all 3 movies. ****, i even cried when prof. x died. so yes, there were tears. but seriously, where the H E L L is jubilee?

separate note, longshot about 10 years, fox channel showed an x-men movie. as a matter of fact, that actress from that show where she's an angel, played storm in this made for tv movie. where can i get that xmen movie? thanks!!
 
Jubilee was in the classroom scene, wearing purple... she didn't say or do anything... which frustrates and angers me very much. :mad: :down :(

I'm hoping she is a bigger part in future X-Films, and even possibly the Wolverine movie.
 
Spider-man was nearly flawless, directed by a guy whos use to doing horror flicks too and it was great.

This is why im not a big fan of Singer, too many little things that could of been done right he did wrong like the simple relationship between Wolvy and Sabretooth.. we fell in love with that rivalry in the comics and cartoons and we get a chance to see it on the big screen but all that happens is wolvy gets tossed around. Simple things like that, overall he made 2 great movies.. but so far neither him or Singer have reached there potential with these X-men movies and that is starting to become a problem.
 
L0ngsh0t said:
there are tones and tones of continuity holes, i have been barking up these since the beginning, it is frusterating at times, they say it can't be perfect, but Spiderman is almost flawless why can't they have made it like that? these quesitons will never be answered so i have learned to not let it bug me that much any more

i just look at it like, Ultimate X-men is way different then the Uncanny X-men, and they are both different tellings then the Astonishing X-Men, so i look at these like the Singer X-Men, because well over 3/4ths of the translation errors, are really artistic liberties he felt like he could make because the movie wouldn't work if they would have done it like it was written, when again, spiderman is about as dead on as you could be, and there is no one complaining there..

Wolverines memory, disregarding half of what most people recognize rouge as, not worring about storm being african, throwing aside Cyclops, and the lackluster action are all descions Singer has claimed where his in various Interviews/ commentaries

yeah it's easy to complain, but i don't hate these movies, and i enojy them alot so whatever
I'm sorry to say this because alot of the Spiderman movie fan will really hate me for this but X-Men movies in my opinion are better the Spiderman movies. X-men next To Batman Begins and The Original Superman movies are the best comic adaptations from comics. I don't know if it is Toby McGuire and Kirstan Dunst as Spiderman and M.J but i never was that crazy about it. I oddly enough liked Daredevil better then Spidy 1. And when Spidy 2 came out i thought X-Men 2 was better then it. I am aware that neither movie came out the same year as those 2 spiderman films. My point is that Spiderman for some reason always make my eyes roll when someone mentions it.

Sorry about that i just had to say that. I agree with you about most of your X-men points. Singer did a good job trying to humanizing the movies. Ratner was smart enough to stay somewhat in the area of the first 2 but i am secretly glad he let the effects come a little bit more intense. Something i expected to see from an x-men film. Both directors made these movies a good trilogy.
 
I still watch Batman Begins over again wondering why people liked it so much I mean I Dont think it was horrible but I dont think it was good either.. I hated the batmobile, I hated Christian Bale as Batman, I hated the action scenes.. they could give someone a seizure, I hated how drawn out it was, I felt that if you took the beginning of the movie where Batman is learning martial arts, etc and stuck it in the Last Samurai no one would know the difference. Bales personallity was nothing like Batmans. Overall it was a boring movie, it had its moments though. I felt if they were gonna do a Batman BEGINS they should of done it right, the Joker should of been the first villan not the Scarecrow.
 
swifty said:
if they used the Joker as the first villain then it would've been too much like B89 which would have turned some people off. I loved BB but I sometimes wish Gotham was more like Burton's which had a darker tone. I really hope they keep the tumbler for the second movie.
They should of done it anyways.. the movie is called Batman BEGINS he didnt begin with the Scarecrow! so he shouldnt be in the movie, neither should a tank for a batmobile. I agree I wish Gotham City was more like Burtons.. this one had too much of an old english style to it.
 
Shadow Moses X said:
They should of done it anyways.. the movie is called Batman BEGINS he didnt begin with the Scarecrow! so he shouldnt be in the movie, neither should a tank for a batmobile. I agree I wish Gotham City was more like Burtons.. this one had too much of an old english style to it.
Who really cares if you liked Bale or Batman Begins. I mean isn't this about an x-men topic not a Batman Bgeins 2 topic. Also Batman Begins was a great movie. The best Batman movie to date. No matter what complaint you have. I still say it was great. Anyone up for Batman v/s Wolverine. Just kidding folks.
 
BloodyWolverine said:
Who really cares if you liked Bale or Batman Begins. I mean isn't this about an x-men topic not a Batman Bgeins 2 topic. Also Batman Begins was a great movie. The best Batman movie to date. No matter what complaint you have. I still say it was great. Anyone up for Batman v/s Wolverine. Just kidding folks.
wow best batman movie to date? how old are you?
 
Am i missing something about Jubilee?

i for one can't stomach the character one bit, she has not once made me care about her or even look at her when she is on paper

maybe TAS has blinded me, because that is really what i think about when i think about Jubilee, but i am glad she has yet to have a big role in the movies
 
GoHF said:
Imagine Lord of the Rings done in three 104 minute movies. That's why.

no i don't mind the length, i don't mind it at all, i like enjoy and respect these movies, and will defend X3 to the grave

but X1 is the one that eats at me the most cause it sets the table for the other three

LOTR is closley followed by the book

in X1 it sometimes feels like they took what was written in these comics for decades, and loosely followed it creating there own universe, instead of following the formula which would work, and that is my big beef with that movie and the franchise but mainly that movie, cause i feel like 2 and 3 have been spent realizing that this Xmen World actually does work for fans when they originally thought it wouldn't (thus creating a different xmen universe then what was previously) and they have been trying to make up for that for the last two movies

but in all seriousness i do think that this is the classiest superhero movie franchise, not the best though, i still think Spiderman has put out better movies, but in my opinion each xmen movie has gotten better, so why stop now
 
LOBO1977 said:
C- and how the hell did magneto know about rogue's ability to absorb other's lifeforce? because in the beginning, how did saber know where to go after rogue up in canada? we know myst. had a habit of going into the mansion whenever she wanted to. we know xavier knew because of ceribral(spell?, i'm tired) but still.
Heeeyyyy! You're right. They never did tell us how Magneto knew where to find Rogue. Twice. First in Canada, and again at the train station. How did he know about her powers?

And for that matter, how the hell did the Brotherhood get around? I know they didn't walk everywhere.

B- why 20 years ago? they should of said "25-27 years ago". because she looks to me like 38 years old. and scott looks like 28-29 years old( i think like angel's age).
I think we're supposed to assume Jean is in her early 30s. Also, Angel was in his early 20s.

D- if leech was the cure, why didnt they move him closer to the phoenix to slow her down?
There's a question I've heard a million times. Here we go...
Jean can read minds, remember? If someone tried to bring Leech to her, she'd know their plan before Leech got close enough to cancel her powers. Then she'd evaporate the kid from a mile away.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
201,243
Messages
21,929,078
Members
45,725
Latest member
alwaysgrateful9
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"