The Amazing Spider-Man WTF!? (Pattinson in SM4?)

or Mysterio.

Or Mysterio too I guess. I don't know though, I've always considered Mysterio to have somewhat of a boastfull, in the spotlight type of presence when he appears(that might just be because of the way he's been drawn a lot, either pointing a finger of doom lol or his fists at his side like some emperor). I don't see Pattinson filling that costume or role, Chameleon on the other hand I've always felt to be a bit of a weakling or flat out *****.
 
HAHA owned...BIG TIME. Well done Tony :hehe:

And Pattison? Honestly, how many of you who say he is a good actor or better actor than McGuire have actually seen him in anything other than Twilight?

McGuire was outstanding in The Cider House Rules and Wonder Boys. This can't be denied. Pattison hasn't got ANYWHERE NEAR THAT LEVEL.


There is no such thing as truth when it comes to art. Everything can be denied when talking about a movie, a song, a book, an actor.... You liked his performance, maybe I did too, maybe I didn't, it doesn't make your statement true.

btw basing on his prestation in twilight, and maguire's prestation in spiderman (even if I have seen him in other movies, it don't think it's important as we are speaking about spiderman) I'm sure he won't be as bad as maguire. And my final statement is only my opinion, not the truth, so you're free to denie it ;-)

:brucebat:
 
Léo Ho Tep;17261690 said:
There is no such thing as truth when it comes to art. Everything can be denied when talking about a movie, a song, a book, an actor.... You liked his performance, maybe I did too, maybe I didn't, it doesn't make your statement true.

btw basing on his prestation in twilight, and maguire's prestation in spiderman (even if I have seen him in other movies, it don't think it's important as we are speaking about spiderman) I'm sure he won't be as bad as maguire. And my final statement is only my opinion, not the truth, so you're free to denie it ;-)

:brucebat:


once again -
aheathpalm.png
abalepalm.png
:facepalm
jokerpalm.png
 
This thread needs to be closed due to stupidity and lack of proof.
 
best suggestion i have heard in a while.

I surely can see who are the funny ones now. You barely have arguments yourselves. I think the most important things are the script and what the director wil do withhis actors. It's up to him to make his actors acting well. What's the point in crying like that before even knowing if Pattinson will truly be in t?

And btw, I'm really surprise by the number of threads closed like that. Not very democratic if you ask me.
 
Léo Ho Tep;17264079 said:
I surely can see who are the funny ones now. You barely have arguments yourselves. I think the most important things are the script and what the director wil do withhis actors. It's up to him to make his actors acting well. What's the point in crying like that before even knowing if Pattinson will truly be in t?

And btw, I'm really surprise by the number of threads closed like that. Not very democratic if you ask me.


thank you, i have been known to be quite the comedian. :o look i've seen his acting. i like(d) him in harry potter. and I had to watch freaking twilight in my spanish III class, and his acting stunk worse than home alone 4...if raimi wants to bring back the majority of fanboys (excluding me, cause SM3 was amazing, IMO) then bringing pattison in is possibly THE WORST POSSIBLE WAY TO DO SO. cept giving spidey nipples / closeups of his crotch... :hehe::hehe::hehe:
 
thank you, i have been known to be quite the comedian. :o look i've seen his acting. i like(d) him in harry potter. and I had to watch freaking twilight in my spanish III class, and his acting stunk worse than home alone 4...if raimi wants to bring back the majority of fanboys (excluding me, cause SM3 was amazing, IMO) then bringing pattison in is possibly THE WORST POSSIBLE WAY TO DO SO. cept giving spidey nipples / closeups of his crotch... :hehe::hehe::hehe:


I didn't hate spiderman 3. I found the action scenes (except the last one) very fun. But still, the script wasn't good.

In spiderman 3, Topher Grace was bad in my opinion, but I can't blame hilm for the whole movie. With a good script, even his performance wouldn't have made the movie a bad one.

Tht's why I think you shouldn't worry about Pattinson. A good script is more important.
 
Léo Ho Tep;17254431 said:
Still those fanboys crying to their poppa because they don't like an actor. Reminds me when we heard Heat Ledger would play Joker....

btw, Pattinson he's way better an actor than Tobey Maguire.

You must live in some ass backwards world where Vampires sparkle and evey day is opposite day. Bless your soul.
 
You must live in some ass backwards world where Vampires sparkle and evey day is opposite day. Bless your soul.

always make me laugh when guys like you state their thinking is right, and others is not. there is a name for that.... :boba:
 
Léo Ho Tep;17264262 said:
I didn't hate spiderman 3. I found the action scenes (except the last one) very fun. But still, the script wasn't good.

In spiderman 3, Topher Grace was bad in my opinion, but I can't blame hilm for the whole movie. With a good script, even his performance wouldn't have made the movie a bad one.

Tht's why I think you shouldn't worry about Pattinson. A good script is more important.


well, i loved all of it. however, as much as i am a fanboy, other fanboys did not. and fanboys are the biggest part in any superhero movie. to bring pattinson into this would..welll..bring it to "batman and robin" levels

and this is obviously some B.S. rumor. as much truth to it as miley cyrus being cast as catwoman.
 
One thing is not to support a movie and another to boycott a film. How old are you? 5?

I'm pretty sure the ladies would love to see that guy as Spidey.
im sure they would...but i certainly wouldnt
Johnny Drama is right...he should feel very confident about what he just stated.
But continue laughing if you wish.
 
The rumor is probably B.S . Next we'll be hearing that Johnny Depp is playing Mysterio and Megan Fox will be the BlacK Cat.
 
Léo Ho Tep;17264323 said:
always make me laugh when guys like you state their thinking is right, and others is not. there is a name for that.... :boba:

Oh but when you do it, everything is sausage gravy? You are the only one allowed to state your opinion?
 
I have never seen any of his movies but Tobey is not that much of an actor if you ask me. He basically plays the same lovable geek in every movie and displays as much emotion as a dead fish

While I agree with this to an extent, I'm fairly certain that Brothers will change my mind. :up:

Agreed. Maguire is wooden and butt ugly. Pattinson looks more like Peter Parker IMO.

And when exactly in the comics was Peter Parker portrayed as having the forehead of a Cro-Magnon...? (Google it.)

once again -
aheathpalm.png
abalepalm.png
:facepalm
jokerpalm.png

^^That's awesome right there.

No, Aunt May will be Carnage.

:lmao:
 
Unlikely given the tight filming schedules of the Twilight pictures, but if so, why not? He's a good actor. So he's a heartthrob? Why the **** should we care, if he's good in the movie and actually helps business? Really.
 
Unlikely given the tight filming schedules of the Twilight pictures, but if so, why not? He's a good actor. So he's a heartthrob? Why the **** should we care, if he's good in the movie and actually helps business? Really.

How many movies have you seen him in, hmm? Harry Potter, thats it. And he wasn't even shown that often. I'm not saying he's not a good actor, but when your playing some lame adaption of a vampire that sparkles you lose all credibilty to do anyting else. Besides, I don't want to see an amazing movie and find out most of the people are seeing it because of the one actor. It pissed me off during Dark Knight, it'll piss me off now. By the way, for all you kids out there wondering, yes I'm one of those Anti-Twilighters.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"