Just like Michael Horn says, it's not about if this stuff is true or not.
Michael Horn is a *****ing psycho...
http://www.iigwest.com/investigations/meier/horn.letters.html
http://theparacast.com/forums/michael-horn-the-billy-meier-contacts-t-859-3.html
James Randi vs Michael Horn (funny as hell):
[FONT=arial, helvetica] A man named Michael Horn, a martial arts practitioner who designates himself as the "Authorized American Media Representative for The Billy Meier Contacts," but offers no evidence for that appointment and is not referred to by the other Meier supporters as such, seems really annoyed. He runs on and on about all sorts of "proof" that he says he can provide. Witness the following excerpts from his latest heated post to me, beginning with mention of the Psychological Stress Evaluator (PSE), which Horn devoutly believes is far more efficient than the polygraph for proving obscure claims. (See "Even Better than the Polygraph?" item up ahead.) I don't need to point out to you the frustration, frenzy, and vitriol released by this man, who finds his favorite delusion threatened. But he's a smooth talker, I'm sure you'll agree. Here's what he wrote to me, in his exact words: [/FONT]
[FONT=arial, helvetica][FONT=times new roman, times, serif]Who said polygraphs, they were PSE tests, you fool, and I doubt that you could pass one if all they asked you was your real name. And you, windbag and poseur, are YOU a metallurgist, photographic expert, film expert, video expert, sound engineer? In your world the tree doesn't make a sound when it's in the forest unless you're there to hear it. But then, with your credibility, who would believe you? [/FONT][/FONT] [FONT=arial, helvetica][FONT=times new roman, times, serif]The metal WAS shown to be other worldly [his emphasis] you devious, lying, self-inflated fraud! Perhaps not as other world as the bottom of the barrel, transparently dishonest, deceptive, and previosuly [sic] unknown to this planet variety of con artist that you nakedly expose yourself to be. No, fool, the game will be played this way. In addition to the already EXPERTLY studied, examined, and validated physical evidence, we are in possession of copyrighted documents and books that were published before the specific events predicted in them occurred. We have legal proof of the "paranormal" so, since you mistook the velvet glove for weakness, as most inwardly terrified, pathetic little bully boys like you do, you will be held to your word to pay up. [/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=arial, helvetica][FONT=times new roman, times, serif]Your value, your only relevance to the debate amounts to providing the full-blown, best poster-boy example of an unscientific, cultic, true believer posing as a "scientist" to contrast with those who've taken the time to research, test and discover the truth. And, rather than slink away because your 15 minutes in the spotlight have long since passed, I encourage you and your happy little band of clueless, inept bumblers to keep up the charade, even at the risk of people thinking we hired you to look stupid, unprofessional, unethical and disreputable, when in truth it's your charitable donation to the cause. [/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=arial, helvetica][FONT=times new roman, times, serif]You, little fella, are one pathetic, feeble and completely out-of-your-league charlatan, which is why no reputable scientist, let alone any rational, thinking individual, would champion your silly nonsense for a second. [/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=arial, helvetica][FONT=times new roman, times, serif]Dry out before you do your parlor tricks for the kids...and have a nice day.[/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=arial, helvetica]My, my. Take an aspirin and call me in the morning, Michael. And for future reference, the tree is supposed to fall in the forest, because standing trees don't make any noise. You see, Michael? [/FONT]
[FONT=arial, helvetica]The one item above that really has seriously taken my fancy, is the line, "The metal WAS shown to be other worldly." Note: the emphasis italics, capitalization, and underlining is Horn's, not mine, which makes this statement more than just a casual remark. Previously, he had written: [/FONT]
[FONT=arial, helvetica][FONT=times new roman, times, serif] Metal alloy samples provided for analysis by Meier to Marcel Vogel, former IBM research chemist, holder of 32 patents; stated that, with any technology available to him as a scientist neither he nor another metallurgist friend who examined the metals, could put it together, could come close to duplicating or reproducing it.[/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=arial, helvetica]I was so elated that I responded: [/FONT]
[FONT=arial, helvetica][FONT=times new roman, times, serif] Ah! Something we can actually examine! Where are these samples? Surely, if this statement is true, we have absolute, inarguable proof of other-worldly technology. By the way, I knew Vogel, and he was not very smart. And what does "holder of 32 patents" indicate? Anyone can get a patent, if they apply and pay the fees. My admittedly amateur search of the files of the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office didn't come up with even one patent by your "expert" Vogel; are his "32 patents" in some other country? But I wander. Where is the metal? If it can be shown to be other-worldly, the JREF million-dollar prize will be awarded. I await that evidence.
[/FONT][/FONT]http://www.randi.org/jr/032604why.html
t:
[FONT=arial, helvetica][FONT=times new roman, times, serif]
[/FONT][/FONT]