During the commentaries on the movie with Zak, Simon and Brat
t: ...there were a couple of things worth mentioning...first of all Zak did most of the talking...its not clear at what point this commentary track was recorded...it seemed like they had a lot of thoughts fresh in their heads about the movie as they discussed that it was some time after it was released...probably over the summer.
Zak and Simon revealed that they pushed for a lot of things to stay in the movie, this we already knew...Brat seemed to be friendly with them and open to some of the discussion during the commentary...but then other times you can hear in his voice that he disagrees with something the writers just said.
They talked briefly about Gambit's almost cameo and how they decided to pull it cuz it wouldn't do him justice, but they didn't mention the no-name dude standing on the hill next to Juggs during Mags speech...they pointed out continuity errors...they complimented all the actors, some pretty standard stuff.
Zak and Simon said they were upset that the original speech Wolverine gave (the one from the trailers) that they wrote was not chosen, as they agreed it was a better scene...Brattner did not agree.
They were upset that Rogue took the cure...Brattner, said something like "you can't not give both sides to storyline"...that there had to be conflict with the characters (like Rogue) who didn't have any action scenes. He said she's already been used in the previous movies, and they had to show realistically what they felt movie Rogue would do...so really its a plot hole with no pay off...they thought that her disapearance through the entire movie makes no sense if she comes all the way back at the end...and
"didn't take the cure?"-Brattners words....also one thing they mentioned that I did not know...is the reason for some of her limited screen time was due to the fact that she was filming another movie...the same was said about Cyclops...this doesn't change the fact that they were both already written out of the story...so its a huge contradiction imo.
Relating to Phoenix and her look...even the writers agreed that how she's depicted in the comic books would not translate well into the reality based movies that Singer had created...so they wanted to keep it somewhat beleiveable.
A few times Brattner asks "were fans upset by that?" or "were fans talking about that online?"....Zak and Simon always responded like "boy did they ever".
They defended the fact that many scenes and references were taken directly from the comics...but thats what the makers of these movies always say
Brattner and the writers agreed that the Danger Room had to be in there and that the studio execs weren't convinced...the reason they were allowed to go through with it was because the fastball special would be used later on at the end...and that this would come full circle....all over one stupid line...Basically, the producers wanted it, the writers wanted and the director all wanted to make sure that we finally got it this time...and thought that we would be happy with so-called "nods to the fans" with the addition of the Sentinel and the look of the sequence being an omage to Days of Future Past.
The explanation of the secret scene at the end wasn't that it was a secret at all...nor was it supposed to intentionally tease us with the idea of an X4...one thing not noticeable in the room...is that this non-brain functioning vegetable is P. Xavier...Xaviers long lost twin brother...so if there is an X4, and Charles returns...this is how they're going to explain it. Brattner and the writers planned the scene but didn't think it would've been filmed...the studio ended up being very happy with that moment. On a side note about teasing us with a sequel...they did say, they set certain characters up for (if ever) a sequel...i.e, Bolivar Trask.
I have to hand it to Lauren Schuler Donner, as she expressed her true dissapointment on the Producers Commentary track, with Rogue taking the cure.
I listened to both commentaries...I'm not sure if this was informative enough to describe the producer's commentary...but I did like when they pointed out things that were Mathew Vaughn's ideas. Overall I like listening to commentaries and these were worth it, because the giant mess that this movie almost was...needed some explaining.
There was little talk about an extended edition...but both commentaries said at times...maybe on the directors cut...however..."the theatrical cut" defends Brattner "is my directors cut"....so, Extended Edition, or Uncut Edition...with special features...is the only way I'm buying this lackluster DVD. The deleted scenes were great, the commentaries...good enough...but I want documentaries, interviews and making of specials. Heres to hoping