chamber-music
Infinity Ammo
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2005
- Messages
- 37,587
- Reaction score
- 3,502
- Points
- 103
I never really liked Cloak & Dagger in X-Men either.
That said, reviving Reilly would have been complicated. Firstly, many of the higher-up's vowed to never do it, and to go back on that would merely be the latest in a series of examples of what Marvel brass say don't mean ****, which would defeat the purpose of doing promotional interviews. Now, a lot of what Joe Q or Tom Brevoort say don't mean **** now anyway, but this would make it worse. But the big second is reviving Reilly from a story perspective would have been a pain. The guy was killed on panel, and turned to dust on panel. Unless you're Dracula or use magic, that's pretty much resurrection proof. Magic was used in OMD/OMIT and it's always awkward in Spider-Man stories. The only option would have been to claim back in '96 Reilly was swapped out with a "defective clone" in time for Osborn to run him through, but that's a major retcon as well as asks people to remember a story I imagine most of Marvel's brass would rather they forgot. Thus, the option of "curing" Kaine so he'd act more like Reilly was seen as the best option. If you see Scarlet Spider as an actual character and not Spider-Man B, then it's a dilemma. I never did, so I suppose I don't mind as much.
Sure he does... Peter's brother. That was a fantastic thing they had going and their dynamic was beautiful. Kaine can't realy fill that like Ben did and that's always a role that can be brought back and done well. His role as the potential "real" Peter is done and I wouldn't want to see it back, but to bring him back as Pete's brother and then move him away from the Clone stuff and let him grow his own legs would be fantastic. Have him do something different from Peter. He could move out west and teach at the Avengers Academy for example. Take the good aspects of Ben Reilly and mix in some of the missed stuff pre-OMD like Peter's role as a teacher. There's things you could do with him.
JH pretty much nailed it. I mean, look at Jean Grey...died after Dark Phoenix, only to end up being a cosmic entity that replicated Jean and put her body below the frikken bay. Colossus I still don't even understand.
I remember reading an earlier interview with Spencer where he said he really wanted to do a cloak and dagger series. I'm betting this mini was just a good testing ground for such things. Also a way to cement them in the Spider-verse wing of the MU since they mainly use and had their start with Spider-Man villains and Mr. Negative would be a pretty perfect antagonist for them in the long term. They fit better here than they ever could with the X-Men, so hopefully it'll stick cause I've always liked them. I would like to see the dagger power be more than just daggers cause it always seemed like cloak had powers that just dwarfed hers, but that's a minor compliant.
You always say this but I fail to see how it's difficult (from the plot perspective anyway). Reilly's death was such a plot loop hole that people yelled about it the very moment it happened and has been ever since. Reilly was a perfected clone and couldn't degenerate. The clone who died degenerated. Therefore, it could not have possibly been Ben according to the whole point of him being the perfect clone. He was defeated by Osborn and out of the picture before Osborn brought a beat up and warn out Ben before Peter and we all know Osborn had an abundance of clones and liked playing mind games. Within the plot of the Spidey mythos Ben's return would be extremely simple... he was switched prior to being brought before Peter.
And is bate and swtich a hard thing? Of course not! It's already been done tons in marvel (Colossus, Multiple Man, Jean Grey). And Reilly's bate and switch would actually make sense straight from the issue he died in... unlike any of those other three I just mentioned (well, maybe Madrox). And to bring fans back to the "horrible" days of the Clone Saga... did they not just bring back Jackal and Kaine... two of the main characters of that time period?
So yeah... you always lay out this novel of excuses as to why it would be so insanely difficult to see a return of Ben Reilly and it really isn't difficult at all. Heck, they said Ben was pretty much winked out of existence and would never be heard from again, and yet, he showed up in the story from BND that shifted back to Ben and Kaine, and then Ben was in a new story in Spider-Man & the X-Men, and then there's all the trades they've been releasing of the Clone Saga of late. It seems to me they don't have so much of an issue letting the Clone Saga era out of the bag these days.
So that said... why change Kaine and go against all character traits and alter him physically off panel and emotionally over several arcs to just get him to a point of being a darker Ben Reilly? Just freakin' bring back Ben Reilly, make him a little more bitter like Bucky or something and move on. It can be done in a single issue and the plot can move forward.
JH pretty much nailed it. I mean, look at Jean Grey...died after Dark Phoenix, only to end up being a cosmic entity that replicated Jean and put her body below the frikken bay. Colossus I still don't even understand.
Sure he does... Peter's brother. That was a fantastic thing they had going and their dynamic was beautiful. Kaine can't realy fill that like Ben did and that's always a role that can be brought back and done well. His role as the potential "real" Peter is done and I wouldn't want to see it back, but to bring him back as Pete's brother and then move him away from the Clone stuff and let him grow his own legs would be fantastic. Have him do something different from Peter. He could move out west and teach at the Avengers Academy for example. Take the good aspects of Ben Reilly and mix in some of the missed stuff pre-OMD like Peter's role as a teacher. There's things you could do with him.
The reason Reilly degenerated back then was fairly simple. REVELATIONS was supposed to finally end the Clone Saga after ASM's sales had been destroyed due to that meandering and complicated mess of a story - at least by the end. Marvel claimed they used to get hundreds, if not thousands, of letters begging to kill Reilly off for the better part of a year by '96. Thus, if Reilly had simply died and laid there, there would have been no conclusive evidence that he wasn't "the real" Spider-Man and the tale would have solved nothing. The story sought to end the Clone Saga and get Osborn back into circulation after 20 years, under the theory of two wrongs making a right. REVELATIONS, if anything, HAD to "reveal" that Peter was real and Reilly was the clone.
Norman Osborn being involved in the clone mess was a bit of hack work by Mackie at the time to justify him as a big bad again. It would have been problematic to remind people there was a link between Osborn and Jackal now that Osborn is in prison and after DARK REIGN, nobody wants to see Norman Osborn for some time.
Jackal and Kaine weren't killed off in as dramatic a fashion. Kaine has sort of just fell off into obscurity while Jackal is akin to Mr. Sinister and can always revive himself with a new body.
Your Colossus example is the most recent, and even he was only dead about 3-5 years. And even that was already AGES ago.
Reilly was featured in flashback stories. There's nothing wrong with a flashback story so long as it adds nothing constructive to continuity. I adored Gage's SPIDER-MAN AND THE X-MEN/FANTASTIC FOUR mini series, but absolutely nothing from it will ever be utilized again. Jon Hickman immediately ignored everything Kristoff did in that, for instance; the fact that Epting stuck with the new armor from that was likely a happy accident. The BND story with the Reilly flashback was just to introduce a new villain named Raptor.
So, you don't like Kaine being made more like Ben Reilly, but you want Ben Reilly to act more like Brubaker's version of Bucky. Right-o.
I imagine the option was that Kaine was chosen because it didn't involve a resurrection and a retcon. He was just wandering around and then he was utilized last year and whatnot into GAUNTLET and GRIM HUNT.
Admittedly, Slott had his chance to bring Reilly back at the start of SPIDER-ISLAND when that "perfect specimen" for Jackal and Queen to mutate into Spider-King. It turned out to have been Steve Rogers, who was captured and mutated mostly off panel and via flashback pages, which admittedly was fairly awkward. Perhaps no more awkward than retconning some minor plot detail from 1996 may have been. Then, of course, we'd have Reilly and Kaine back at once and that's compound the dilemma unless one of them is killed off.
To me, it really doesn't matter who they use. They could have dusted off that last MVP clone if they wanted. The problem is that regardless of who it is, it still amounts to Spider-Man Lite or Spider-Man B, and I don't think anyone is really looking for that. Those that are, are already on VENOM, and I don't think they want another. Especially since they haven't flocked to Arana/Spider-Girl and she's been sold to audiences twice within the last 7 years. I don't think there is a place for that regardless of who it is.
That was in the 80's. It's a different market and the same things won't fly.
As for Colossus, Joss Whedon claimed aliens swapped out his corpse with a copy that was cremated while they revived the original and experimented.
I can't imagine Kaine or Reilly could have taught at Avengers Academy because the cadets had already met the actual Spider-Man. It would have seen as a false Spider-Man copy who can't cut it and decided to teach. That's actually kind of pathetic. He's better off in Texas.![]()
I don't think Peter needs a "brother". He has various supporting characters to talk to as Peter as well as MJ and no end of superheroes to talk to as Spider-Man, or both.
I do agree that Kaine is awkward in that role since he was an adversary before, although wasn't the 90's retcon was that Kaine was made BEFORE Reilly, just Reilly turned out better? Thus, without Reilly or the clone degeneration, he would fill Reilly's role. Frankly, it is all a bit awkward.
Yep... it sure is sad when people hang on to stuff years later.... makes it even more sad when it's about comic books...
![]()
Yes because you don't ever consider stuff that's happened years ago in the past, right? In fact Spider-Man should get retconned every year and those whiny *****es should just flow with it.
Yep... it sure is sad when people hang on to stuff years later.... makes it even more sad when it's about comic books...
![]()
Yo md... your eyes are turning brown again...![]()
Just make your complaints better in the future and we won't have these problems.
You are a major continuity guy with Spider-Man to the point where you enter into daily contests all the time for trivia. So maybe saying it's sad when people hang on to things from the past could have been rephrased in a way that's well...better I guess is the word I'm looking for.
Just make your complaints better in the future and we won't have these problems.
You are a major continuity guy with Spider-Man to the point where you enter into daily contests all the time for trivia. So maybe saying it's sad when people hang on to things from the past could have been rephrased in a way that's well...better I guess is the word I'm looking for.