javonstokess
Sidekick
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2015
- Messages
- 3,413
- Reaction score
- 758
- Points
- 73
IMO...the Attitude Era was something special, but at that time it was shock value that grabbed the main stream audience. D-X and their controversial antics, The Ministry (crucifying people), The Nation of Domination (racist overtones, hell they held Chyna down as the Rock acted like he was going to kiss her), The Oddities, Val Venis, GTV, the racist stereotypes like Kai-In-Tai (spelling)...and Stone Cold/McMahon, I just watched the clip where Stone Cold put a gun to Vince's head (even tho it did say "Bang 3:16"). At the same time South Park was also at an all time high and was super popular. It was a different time where nothing was sacred, nothing was off limits it seemed like.
We live in an era now that is super PC, as a whole. Everyone worries about offending someone. The smart business move is to not offend and be steady or safe. None of what I listed would fly these days on TV. Hence the "PG era" WWE is in now. I'm not saying that PG is at fault for where WWE is now, but my point is that people used to tune in to see what crazy stuff would happen next. More people/friends would hear about it and tune in next week. That shock value was off the charts.
I watched from 1996-2001/2? I started watching again a year ago. The program now is typically not very good and predictable. Every week on Raw the order of events is the same and the main events seem stale (not all). They can't make stars like they used to. I enjoy it to a certain degree, but that isn't saying much. I don't see it ever being mainstream again. Vince had the magic touch and I don't see that happening again.
I don't think it's the WWE "can't" make stars anymore, I think it's they don't want to pull the trigger on logical decisions due to possible financial implications or personal bias.
For example, look at the members of the Shield. Seth Rollins started out as an awesome heel and they started in a good direction by making Dean Ambrose his main nemesis, but they watered down Dean. Now Seth's back and he's just a weird, watered down face with nowhere near the reactions he got as a heel.
Now look at Roman Reigns, this is a guy who COULD be the biggest heel the WWE has had in years, but they don't want to fully pull the trigger. Had the WWE actually done what used to come natural to them, Reigns would have turn on Dean during the mini-tournament for the championship. In that fell swoop, you would have created two of the biggest stars in the business with a swarmy, cocky Roman Reigns (which we know he can play) and the lunatic out for revenge in Dean Ambrose. That SHOULD have lead to a one-on-one at Wrestlemania w/Dean winning the title.
BUT, the like Roman as a face and push him like the underdog and they clearly aren't sold on Ambrose as the top face so he kinda meanders in the mid-to-upper card losing alot because they know he'll remain a fan favorite. All three guys SHOULD be bigger stars than they are, but instead of listening to the fans, the WWE either looks at the bottom line or sticks with what "they" think.
It's like they can catch the lightning, but always chose to let it go because they think a better bolt of lightning will be along any second.












