• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

Age of Ultron Your worries/concerns with Age of Ultron

1) So many things going on
2)Reception of the Vision
3)Explanation of Vision, where he comes from, and his color scheme (It never made sense in the comics that Ultron would choose to build a green-yellow-red robot)
4)Explanation of Ultron
5)The supposed ending of the movie with a new team

I have to say I'm far less worried about this movie than Civil War. I don't know how the general audience will react to that, especially turning their biggest and most popular hero (Iron Man) into an antagonist and government tool.
 
What are you worried about with the explanation of Ultron?
 
That after the Russo's single handily legitimised the entire MCU with one movie (CA:TWS) Joss Whedon could turn it back into an SNL skit version of the Marvel Universe again. Like Iron Man 3, Thor: The Dark World and somewhat Guardians of the Galaxy was.
:shr:TWS did not legitimize the MCU universe...It was legitimate and in good hands well before TWS...
You may have problems with some of the other movies but all of us can find faults with every movie including TWS , but to call the others not legitimate is a bit harsh and their Box office success shows this....
No current marvel movie thus far has been a Box office dud...
 
Iron Man 3, GotG, and the Avengers were all fantastic movies. And Thor 2 was pretty good. The MCU was doing great even before TWS.
 
TWS legitimised the MCU?? Where'd you get that from? The MCU worked as a proof of concept from Iron Man 2 onwards
 
Oh I enjoyed them don't get me wrong, I love the ****ing Marvel films.
I saw them all at least twice in the cinema. But some people consider CA:TWS the best Marvel movie so far and I can see why. The Avengers is still my favourite but Captain America TWS is literally one millimetre behind The Avengers for me and that says something.

I'll explain, you watch Thor 2, Iron Man, Cap TFA and your like awesome, cool movies. Then you watch TWS and you realise OMG....."imagine if the previous movies took it to this level" "imagine if the previous movies hit this hard." Imagine how much better the MCU would be now. I enjoyed most the MCU movies but TWS made me realise what the MCU could've been. It's really refreshed my excitement for the next MCU films and I feel the Russo's have set the tone for Phase 3. That's what I mean by what I said about legitimising the MCU. TWS is arguably the MCU's best film critically.

Also Iron Man 3 was terrible, it sucked dude. I consider Iron Man 2 better. Guardians of the Galaxy was epic though. I just hope they be careful with the tone for the sequel But Gunn made it work in the first film.
 
Last edited:
I can see someone connecting personally to IM2 more than IM3, but on technical level, craft, story structure & thematic subtext alone I have trouble seeing how it could be considered even a "bad movie", put on the shelf with the likes of GL and X3. I understand some dislike the tonal shifts, but it's more like a skilled juggling act than the freeform looseness that IM2 gets off the rails with, enjoyable as that movie's improv humor may be.
 
To be honest I never walked out of TWS going OMG, it was a good movie to be sure but nothing life changing or earth shattering..But that's just my own opinion....
We each have our favorite Hero....You appear to be a Big Cap fan and that's great, Lets just leave it at that...
I just wish a AOU trailer would get here....Jeezzzzzz.....
 
That after the Russo's single handily legitimised the entire MCU with one movie (CA:TWS) Joss Whedon could turn it back into an SNL skit version of the Marvel Universe again. Like Iron Man 3, Thor: The Dark World and somewhat Guardians of the Galaxy was.

Are you serious? Please explain how they did this?
 
I can see someone connecting personally to IM2 more than IM3, but on technical level, craft, story structure & thematic subtext alone I have trouble seeing how it could be considered even a "bad movie", put on the shelf with the likes of GL and X3. I understand some dislike the tonal shifts, but it's more like a skilled juggling act than the freeform looseness that IM2 gets off the rails with, enjoyable as that movie's improv humor may be.
I actually thought X3 was awesome but hey.

Iron Man 2 I loved at first but after watching it loads of times, it's just ok.
There's so much wrong with Iron Man 3 The first half was actually brilliant but after Tony gets to that kid it goes to ****. If you really want to know what I think

The kid, the kid wasn't that bad but to be honest, the only good thing about the kid was Robert Downey Jr, it was like he just had to deal with the situation he was put in, the best RDJ could and the responses were the best part but then again RDJ's responses are usually the only really good comedy in all of this film. It just seemed forced and obvious that Disney were trying to appeal to the kiddies really badly.

What about the people that were sold on the trailer? **** them right? So many fans, people that didn't even read a single page of the comics voiced their disappointment at The Madarin twist, people were sold on a villain that challenged Tony Stark and put him up against the wall, in interviews they said The Mandarin takes everything from Tony and really makes Tony desperate in this film, I know Killian is the "spiritual Mandarin" but honestly I don't think anyone found him the least bit threatening."OMG you left me on the roof now I must make this OTT elaborate plan to have my revenge!" Every hero has that opposite spectrum, that one guy that they play off of, the one guy who's a huge threat and really challenges them emotionally, physically and intellectually, Tony Stark in this film series has not had that, he's not had a villain come and smack that smile right off his face and made him say "wow I need wake the **** up this isn't a joke anymore." Mandarin had that damn potential to be Iron Man's Joker but they threw that potential in the sea. Killian was cracking jokes, the interrupted broadcast Madarin was serious as **** and that's what really appealed to me.

[YT]Xd6r0vOlf3M[/YT]
^^Extremis motion comic, the comic the film was based on. Yes that soooo isn't down to earth, how is it the comic is thrice darker than the ****ing movies? Not to mention more realistic to boot. Iron Man had every ability to be a down to earth drama, it was for the first act of the film, the best part of the film IMO then at some point after the kid showed up, it was like they just stopped caring or some *****e started trying to add stupid ideas.
Ok our enemies are a fake front, so now we have to represent that in our fantasy super hero flicks? Why don't they just do a similar twist with the Joker? That would be fun right? The Joker is just a front to cause fear, it's not that he's this psychopath that has this devils advocate, anarchic view of society that has to be stopped and proven wrong. He's just an actor named Trevor hired by some dude who couldn't get laid back in high school and holds a grudge. So he makes this Joker front to hide behind while he works, that's so interesting, I love the commentary on terrorism and life.
When you have to get your political message out to the point it detracts from the story, especially if executed horribly like it was in IM3 then you will have problems.

It was silly the way he kept switching to making jokes, and PTSD panic attacks, just seemed fake and made me care less about his problems. Like I said I don't mind the comedy usually when it's only RDJ (like it was in The Avengers) but it seemed like everyone in this was in a Saturday Night Live skit about terrorism and superheroes, DID NOT WANT.

I don't mind changes from source material but if you change too much to the point the character is unrecognizable, why bother calling it an adaptation in the first place? Just go ahead make your own original story. The whole point of adaptations is to see the same character come to life in a different medium, if the character is nothing like in his source material then you lose that character. If Tony Stark was called Michael Benson and he created Audi R8 transformers instead of red and gold Iron Man suits it wouldn't be Iron Man anymore.

If you compare the general audience reactions of this to that of The Avengers, you'll find that this is a lot more mixed. Iron Man 3 is like marmite, you either love it or hate it. I don't actually hate it, I'm just disappointed. Watching it the second time had me thinking; just imagine what this could've been if they kept the same tone from the first act onwards, it had potential to be a mind blowing dramatic action in-depth conclusion to Tony Stark's story and his dealing with the aftermath of Avengers and a new threat but somewhere in-between it just decided to nudge the funny bone of audiences instead of taking TWS route.

Mandarin was old but pretty badass, Im sure if Hollywood wanted to make an old man a badass fighter they can do it. But IMO I think him being a behind the scenes brains of the operation power player would've been pretty epic if done right.
Though Mandarin and and Iron Man had some pretty bad ass fights in the comics.
938797-iron_man_v4_028__23__super.jpg

The_Mandarin_vs_Iron_Man_by_andrema.jpg

I didn't like some of the final fight because of the comedy elements, the poking the little turtle soup **** Killian was doing, wtf was that ****? And Tony making light of Pepper's supposed death, he was more angry when Happy got injured, unless he truly believes in bro's before ho's then that was some bull!
I enjoyed the action and Rhodys scenes but again most of the finale was ruined by the annoying urge the powers that be had to put a one liner after every action set piece. I really hated how the suits were just ripped up like paper so easily by Killian, it was just a Dues Ex Machina in order to give Tony a reason to jump from suit to suit, it was weak. And finally Pepper delivering the final blow to Killian was kinda ********, the film was about Tony's battle, it's called Iron Man not Iron Pepper. I see they were trying to do some female empowerment ******** and stop Pepper being a damsel for once but it was so obvious and forced. She didn't need to deliver the final blow in order to be a strong woman. Again other ways it could've been done.
Iron Man 3 was fun but it could've been epic if they had just kept the same tone from the first act. It's like the first act and the middle onwards was directed by a completely different person.

@Tee Kay I explained my radical statement a couple posts above yours.
 
Last edited:
The MCU isnt the comic books, so people that want exact copies of what they do in that format will be dissapointed. These movies are for everyone, not just hardcore comic readers. Theres going to be some changes, I think so far theyve made great decisions on how they altered things. Also, theyre taking risks with these movies, sometimes you cant please every single person. Personally, I love Iron Man 3 because it wasnt just another tired super hero vs super villain story. There was all kinds of cool ideas going on in terms of Tony showing hes still a hero outside the suit, the whole Mandarin media fakeout etc. Its a smart, fresh spin on the character (that I feel it def needed after 1 and 2) and wasnt just treating the audience like little children who only want POW! BOOM! ZAP! for 2 hours with nothing going on underneath it.
 
Are you serious? Please explain how they did this?

I'm not about to disagree that Guardians of The Galaxy somehow unlegitimized the franchise but honestly, Winter Soldier was a class of its own in comparison to the other Marvel films. I don't see any issue with it being held up high as the gold standard. They made the first comic book film i'd put in the same league as Nolan's Batfilms or Spider-man 2, his comments are not inaccurate at all.
 
Are you serious? Please explain how they did this?

I think many film critics+GA agreed about TWS being the first MCU film which held as a good film, not just as a good superhero film.
You take away the fact Steve kicks people like they were soccer balls or defies laws of physics with a super shield, and it's still and absorbing, entertaining, well thought spy thriller.

I think all MCU movies should aim for that standard (not saying GotG didn't, it was a good adventure comedy on itself).
 
If that's how you feel about the movie, that's cool; I just have a different preference I suppose -- many things you mentioned I've addressed when the movie came out so I don't feel much like revisiting them, but I will say that in preparation for the movie I watched the Extremis motion comic and was nearly bored to tears. I didn't care much for the tone especially, in taking itself so seriously, I couldn't. Not unlike a person, movies tend to win me over when they reveal a sense of humor about themselves and execute it properly. Many on these boards didn't feel the movie did, but I thought so, and it helped me get invested in the dramatic elements, rather than detract from them.

Also I'm probably in the minority here, but whenever people ask "What if they did that with the Joker?" I actually have to say I wouldn't have a problem with it if they pulled it off the way they did here. But it wouldn't quite work as well, since the Mandarin's origins are rooted in that very subject matter, so it felt more appropriate to me. And while I'm not denying they could've done a badass old man for sure, the satirical take on both public-eye bogeymen as well as gritty supervillains was a risky move that I really respected and found effective.

Keep in mind, I'm saying this as someone who considers TWS to be his favorite MCU movie; which sort of surprised me considering I'd been banking on GOTG to edge it out.
 
That after the Russo's single handily legitimised the entire MCU with one movie (CA:TWS) Joss Whedon could turn it back into an SNL skit version of the Marvel Universe again. Like Iron Man 3, Thor: The Dark World and somewhat Guardians of the Galaxy was.

Oh, waa waa, how dare Marvel actually include humor in their movies. The DCU is over that way, they have plenty of grim joyless films for you to "enjoy".
 
Vison said:
The MCU isnt the comic books, so people that want exact copies of what they do in that format will be dissapointed. These movies are for everyone, not just hardcore comic readers. Theres going to be some changes, I think so far theyve made great decisions on how they altered things. Also, theyre taking risks with these movies, sometimes you cant please every single person. Personally, I love Iron Man 3 because it wasnt just another tired super hero vs super villain story. There was all kinds of cool ideas going on in terms of Tony showing hes still a hero outside the suit, the whole Mandarin media fakeout etc. Its a smart, fresh spin on the character (that I feel it def needed after 1 and 2) and wasnt just treating the audience like little children who only want POW! BOOM! ZAP! for 2 hours with nothing going on underneath it.
I don't want exact copies of the comics.
Yes it's for everyone, still Iron Man 3 got mixed reception from the general public, as a matter of fact, I've seen more people who casually watch the MCU HATE Iron Man 3 than movie buffs, nerds and comic fans who seem to try and justify it's stupidity. They've made some great decisions but ultimately they've stuck to the same formula. Thor: The Dark World should've been an epic tale about the 9 realms and Beta Ray Bill, Darci and her dumb intern should've not been in it, Darci should've maybe just had a small cameo to explain what she's been up to and then ****ed off like Jar Jar Binks in Episode 2. The Warriors Three and Lady Siff should've had that screen time. Thor and Beta Ray Bill should've teamed up at the end. But then again if Bill picks up the Hammer before Cap it would ruin Cap's moment, so maybe that's why they haven't introduced him yet.

You're tired of the super hero vs villain story? So you prefer a joke character instead? And YOU STILL HAD A VILLAIN ANYWAY AND HE WASN'T INTERESTING IN THE SLIGHTEST. Tony being a hero outside the suit? They could've summed that up in like maybe 2 scenes at most, not the entire damn film. He should've been in the suit in the plane scene, if he can operate Iron Man without being in the suit then what's the point? Hopefully Age of Ultron fixes this mess of Tony being able to control the suit remotely. The Mandarin twist was not smart or unique we've seen it done a thousand times and much better and not played up for cheap laughs. It was done in The Lost Boys, it was done in The Dark Knight Rises in the same year! It was done in Ghost, it was done in Mission Impossible. It's not fresh and its not fresh in the superhero genre either. In-fact I wouldn't have even minded Mandarin not being the big bad, if it wasn't played for an unfunny confusing joke that completely takes you out the movie. It was stupid and false advertising, so poorly received that they had to do a Marvel One Shot revealing a real Mandarin somewhere out there, so lame.

@Son of Coul
Seems me and you just have very different tastes, you seem to like the fun silly side of Marvel and I like the more serious epic side, which is fine. I still enjoy the silly side as long as it makes sense for the story and characters. But I'm glad TWS opened your eyes that the MCU can be serious and be better than just trying to tickle peoples funny bones and wink and elbow nudge the audience all the time.

Oh, waa waa, how dare Marvel actually include humor in their movies. The DCU is over that way, they have plenty of grim joyless films for you to "enjoy".
I don't mind humour WHEN IT MAKES SENSE, Iron Man 1 had good humour, Avengers had good humour. But when it becomes the entire genre of a superhero flick not meant to be laughed at then it's a problem. Shane Black made an action, comedy, Iron Man should never be an action comedy. Just action with mild humour not a full blown SNL Skit, I couldn't take the film seriously.

Anyway enough of it now. You all know what I meant. And Guardians was awesome I just don't want that tone to take over the MCU because it's popular, I need TWS's tone. Thrilling, action packed with mild humour. Not comedy with hints of action.

I hope Joss Whedon's trailers are actually honest and not straight up lie like Iron Man's 3's did.
 
I don't think there are many fans who want exact copies of the comics as most of these stories wouldn't work in a movie. But, there are lots of very talented comic book writers and to ignore their stories completely would be a mistake. The best elements of the comic Winter Soldier story were incorporated into the movie but some were excluded as well (the reduction of Agent 13s role is the only fault I can find with this movie). Ultron has had some brilliant stories in the comics and I hope these will be captured in the movie.
 
Double088: youre overreacting to what I said. Of course some of the ideas in IM3 werent 100% original, I never said that. I meant it was a fresh take on the IRON MAN movies so far. They def couldve gone the traditional comic book Mandarin route but they didnt, they tied in things that are relevant to today, the terrorism aspect, the media machine etc. Yes THAT was fresh for what we've seen in Marvel movies so far. Im not talking about cinema history in general.

Most of the other stuff you complained about isnt worth me trying to defend. I loved the action comedy aspect, love Trevors role and the remote control suit sequence too btw. I actually appreciate Iron Man 3 more every time I watch it. I might be in the minority, but so be it.

Youre not gonna bait me into getting all PO'd over these kinds of things. Ive seen lots of movies and I know what I like/dont. So rant on if you must. I said my piece.
 
@Son of Coul
Seems me and you just have very different tastes, you seem to like the fun silly side of Marvel and I like the more serious epic side, which is fine. I still enjoy the silly side as long as it makes sense for the story and characters. But I'm glad TWS opened your eyes that the MCU can be serious and be better than just trying to tickle peoples funny bones and wink and elbow nudge the audience all the time.

edit: oh forget it.
 
Last edited:
I'm not trying to make you angry Vision I'm just hoping you're not a blind fanboy that just loves everything Marvel and can't critique anything they do. I'm sure you're not and you have reasons.

Iron Man 3 is like marmite, you either love it or hate it. Most people hate it though.

Am I that black guy and is the other guy Son of Coul? **** it, it is now lol.
 
^^ No thats me as Obama dropping the mic. haha

But really, Im not a blind fanboy, Im just taking these movies for what they are. Also when I first saw IM3 I wasnt sure if I liked how it changed what Favreau started but now Ive seen it several times and i honestly think it was really well done and a nice twist on what we got from IM before that. You know theres only so many ways in film to do the "good guy vs bad guy" plot, all Im saying is, Shane Black did something pretty unexpected rather than just using the "evil Asian Mandarin with super powers" idea from the comics. I loved the Trevor character and got a kick out of how he was used as a fake villain etc. I thought he did an excellent job balancing the humor in the classic Lethal Weapon style with the more serious aspects.
 
Last edited:
Iron Man 3 is the Mass Effect 3 of the MCU for me - awesome stuff throughout, but the ending is an absolute dud. To me, the problems aren't in the Mandarin (cool twist imo) or the random Extremis soldiers, its the sudden and inexplicable ability for Stark to remove the shrapnel, his sudden wish to not have the suits, and zero explanation for those changes. It's frustrating

Anyway, Ultron, woooo
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"