4th VILLIAN IS THERE!!!

Who do you think the fourth villian will be?

  • Carnage

  • Chameleon

  • Electro

  • Hobgoblin

  • Hydro-Man

  • Kraven The Hunter

  • Jackal

  • Lizard

  • Mysterio

  • Rhino

  • Scorpion

  • Vulture


Results are only viewable after voting.
Flexo said:
Raimi has said before that he's only going to do three films.

Spider-Man 3 wouldn't be the end of the series, just the end of Raimi's job as director.

wrong again.

Raimi said that he is enjoying creating Spider-Man movies and if Sony would have him back after this one he would most likely be delighted.

the rest of the cast, however, is up for grabs.

Dunst has been quoted as saying she wants to avoid being stapled as MJ throught her entire career....and Tobey's fiance just had their baby (or is still pregnant...i can't remember)
 
Don't expect this to be the last film unless they say so! Even then, somebody else will pick up where raimi left off...theres too much money to just stop making Spider-Man movies! Sometimes i wish they'd just let sequels be, but the company's dont care when they're bound to get more money, even if it ruins the series.
 
Trilogy will be enough.

4, 5 and 6 movies will ruin everything. There will not be Dunst and some other actors, and most likely there will be new director ala Schumacher.
 
Raimi says he would be willing to direct another Spider-Man film after the third one. "I'd love to make more," he said. "I never asked [Sony motion picture chairman Amy Pascal], but I have the feeling that she just wants this one to be the final one. She's very emotionally attached to them and wants us to have a sense of completion to it for the audience and feels that that's what the audience wants, that they don't want to see a Spider-Man 4, that they probably would like to see a Spider-Man 3, but not really any more. So she wants to make it complete and final, without setting up new things at the end."

source: http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache...am+raimi+spiderman+4&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=5

and by the way...Amy Pascal has retracted that comment, this quote dates back to when Sam was still trying to decide on which villians he wanted for SM3.
 
yeah mysterio is lame - doubt he will be in it.
 
jrd550 said:
yeah mysterio is lame - doubt he will be in it.


hes not a huge villain that needs a whole movie to himself, they could use him for 1 minute on screen and make it work
 
Spider-X said:
Raimi says he would be willing to direct another Spider-Man film after the third one. "I'd love to make more," he said. "I never asked [Sony motion picture chairman Amy Pascal], but I have the feeling that she just wants this one to be the final one. She's very emotionally attached to them and wants us to have a sense of completion to it for the audience and feels that that's what the audience wants, that they don't want to see a Spider-Man 4, that they probably would like to see a Spider-Man 3, but not really any more. So she wants to make it complete and final, without setting up new things at the end."

source: http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:39MXofHTWW4J:www.killermovies.com/s/spiderman3/articles/4509.html+sam+raimi+spiderman+4&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=5

and by the way...Amy Pascal has retracted that comment, this quote dates back to when Sam was still trying to decide on which villians he wanted for SM3.

Well, as what I know, Raimi will not direct other parts, because Sony will not give him money.
 
Cinemaman said:
Well, as what I know, Raimi will not direct other parts, because Sony will not give him money.

source please.

and these Spider-Man movies from Raimi are cashcows...if SM3 is another triumph...why fix it if it ain't broke?
 
Mysterio can have a cameo, just appear for a fight or something real quick, like a lot of villains in the video games, you fight them for 5 minutes and they're done, no explanation needed. If they have Mysterio, thats how he should be done.
 
I garrentee its just any appearance from Quentin Beck rather than a proper villian like GG" and sandman.
 
Sam Raimi is the real-life Mysterio. An illusionist conman trying to destroy Spidey.
 
and why not the Lizard? We have Dr. Connors in SM2 and he is confirmed for SM3...
 
Spider-X said:
and why not the Lizard? We have Dr. Connors in SM2 and he is confirmed for SM3...

While the Lizard is still a possibility, I doubt he will be in the film, just for the reason that he would take too much screen time.
 
Originally Posted by Cinemaman
Well, as what I know, Raimi will not direct other parts, because Sony will not give him money.

As long as Sony is making money on Spider-man...Sony will give money to Raimi. Theres no doubt in my mind.
 
SouLeSS said:
Chances are he'll be a cameo within the first 10 minutes of the movie. No backstory given on him, just some guy dressed like him getting thwarted by Spidey.

Or part of a Montage that explains what's been going on with EmoParker since Spiderman 2.


that would be neat to see what hes been doing since SM-2, i could see it working like that
 
Im hoping Bruce could play Mysterio, that would be aweasome. It could be a great 5 min cameo.
 
it's been thrown around that this 4 villian is Shocker, a throw-away character just for spidey to beat the crap outta.
 
So are we gonna see Mysterio in costume fighting spidey?
 
GoldGoblin said:
So are we gonna see Mysterio in costume fighting spidey?

speculation my friend...there are waaaay too many blanket statements with no re-enforcment being thrown around here lately.
 
GoldGoblin said:
So are we gonna see Mysterio in costume fighting spidey?

i doubt it but i would love to see the bubble dome on the big screen
 
I don't think so. They probably got that from the version of the Q&A that I sent to AICN.
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"