• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

9/11 conspiracies are bull toast.

Dan33977 said:
I said what I said because I think Bush is in a lose-lose situation. He didn't do anything to prevent bin Laden from attacking this country and people now criticize him and moan; however, if he had something, people would still complain and moan.

I so agree with this statement.

Look, maybe Bush did recieve a memo saying Bin Laden was planning to attack the U.S. Yet if he did take action immediately there would be no idea when and where Al Quada would attack. Plus the fact that no one knew how large a scale this attack could be. So your telling me that Bush deliberately wanted this attack to happen? It's so easy for others to criticize after the events had happened. Try putting yourself in the president's shoes. If you had very vague info on an attack would you take action? Chances are most of you wouldn't and don't lie. The reason, if it turns out the information is false you have mud in your face and america's perspective is changed.

Think about wars that happened in American history. Did we ever rarely declare war without something sparking it? say an attack on american soil? 9/11 was that reason why we're in Iraq. Not because Bush used the 9/11 attack to his advantage, but to learn a mistake from it. What he was trying to prove was that you cannot turn down any information given to the US about a foreign threat. So this is where Iraq comes in. 9/11 happened and we've chased Bin Laden for about 2 or something years now. Uh-oh, we have some information that Iraq may be a posable threat for weapons of mass destruction. Can I risk another attack on the US or on perhaphs a greater scale? No, it's too much of a risk to make the same mistake twice. Bush would have been called weak had he not taken action.

So you decide, what should Bush have done to please everyone? Without knowing what we do now.
 
The entire "defense steel only melts at 1500" argument doesn't really hold water as it does not take into account the face that there was a huge impact on the building (a jet airliner crashing into it) causing stress to and weakening the steel.
 
Matt said:
The entire "defense steel only melts at 1500" argument doesn't really hold water as it does not take into account the face that there was a huge impact on the building (a jet airliner crashing into it) causing stress to and weakening the steel.

If someone mentions that "people saw no windows on the airplanes before they hit the towers" I'm goint to kill them.
Hundreds of people claim to see images of Mary too
 
Wilhelm-Scream said:
Key members of P.N.A.C., Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz
So, regardless of what any of those three said in public, it's a simple fact, by their own admission, that they were glad to see 9/11 happen.

Just so those unfamiliar with it go ahead and QUICKLY familiarize themselves with it.

go, now!

be swift.
 
you're privileged, most people don't know...until it's too late


:(
 
Mr Sparkle said:
you're privileged, most people don't know...until it's too late


:(

Too true. Getting back to point. Truer words were never spoken. They can't run a war much less pull off an elaborate conspitacy.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,262
Messages
22,074,587
Members
45,875
Latest member
kedenlewis
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"