Key Witness to WTC7 9/11 Mysteriously Dies

[amazingfantasy15]

The one thing I have a problem with in all these conspiracies is that the government could pull off this grand conspiracy of being behind the 9/11 attacks, yet every other mistake they've made they haven't been able to cover up. If you can plan 9/11, you can certainly stage a bunch of troops finding nuclear weapons in Iraq.

 

[TNC9852002]

It's only been a few years.

Remember our nation's declassified and still undisclosed and unsolved issues with Roswell, JFK, Cuba, Pearl Harbor, Vietnam, Oklahoma City, and WW2? Go do your own research.

It took decades for new information on some of these things to be made public, declassified and for government officials to come forward. With today's society being the way it is now, I could only assume that IF they were to do something like this, that they'd be a lot better in covering their tracks, especially when pertaining to what gets out on the news stations and the internet.

I'm just trying to spread the knowledge and try to show that the line between being a so-called conspiracy theorist, and being patriotic can be a thin one. Personally, I can't take sides and I'm still unsure about all of this. I've seen a lot of theories that are just plain ridiculous and bizarre, but I've heard others that hold a lot more weight and have motivated me to do my own research. I've probably spent hundreds of hours researching 9/11, Oklahoma City, Vietnam, Iraq, and UFO coverups in the last five years. I'm beginning to underestimate what our government could be capable of doing. But, of course, it's not just America.

I just don't know (for sure)! But that's the whole point. None of us do.

But, to be honest, one would have to be completely blind to not consider a lot of the weird coincidences and lack of response or intelligence that had to have correlated for these events to occur. There's enough evidence FOR a conspiracy theory to be at least CONSIDERED in even the smallest sense. Most of these so-called "conspiracy nuts" aren't telling everyone there's a conspiracy. Most of the media tells you that's what they're intentions are. These are the extremists that show the negative side of things.

To me, it's just that there is nearly half America that just acknowledges that the series of events leading to and after 9/11 just seem fishy and there's plenty evidence and witness testimony to support their opinions.

Take this video for example:


-TNC

 

[chaseter]

It was 7 years ago...if this person didn't tell their story by now then oh well.

 

[Hotwire]

While I don't personally believe that the government blew up anything that day, I do believe that they knew what was going to happen, and let it happen. Kind of like what people speculated about FDR and Pearl Harbor.

Just bumping my post. Wondering what you guys thought.

 

[chaseter]

The only thing I believe is that the one that didn't make it to the White House was shot down That is fine to allow those people to be remembered as heroes that fought to take control of the plane but come on...why would they crash it or not attempt to contact air traffic control to help them land it or tell them what was going on? It was shot down to avoid a risk and covered up to protect the government.

 

[TNC9852002]

It was 7 years ago...if this person didn't tell their story by now then oh well.

From what I've gathered, Jennings has been on tons of media outlets, telling story, but never on a grand scale. Some of these typical investigations such as investigating the causes of WTC7's collapse can take a long time to be brought to court. Barry Jennings was about to approach the grand jury pretty soon as I recall. I guess for some reason, his health failed him at the wrong time.

Just bumping my post. Wondering what you guys thought.

I've seen some pretty weird things that the US government has been..."entangled" with in the last 150 years. After what I've seen and read, I can't possibly single any particular seemingly credible theory out. Even if they were just strange coincidences.

-TNC

 

[chaseter]

Investigations such as these take a long time. Barry Jennings was about to approach the grand jury pretty soon as I recall. I guess for some reason, his health failed him at the wrong time.

-TNC

If he truly knew what happened...he should have told someone or wrote it down in a journal or documented it somehow.

 

[Heretic]

Ah, I see a lot of people have seen the fiction that is Loose Change.

Guys...Im sorry...but the "evidence" that shows that the government did it is just not even remotely real. The "expert" who works at the steel company who said the steel wouldnt bend and break like that actually worked in the water treatment division of the company and had no knowledge whatsoever of how steel operates under high temperatures...heck, Loose Change even doctored the photographs of the Pentagon to make the crash site look smaller.

There are numerous websites, and a video that I think is called Screw Loose Change that debunks every claim mad by the conspiracy theoriests. Completely and utterly proves it to be fiction.

Bottom line, Muslim extremists hijacked a couple of planes. It really was that cut and dry.

 

[TNC9852002]

If he truly knew what happened...he should have told someone or wrote it down in a journal or documented it somehow.

Well, it's not that he knew what truly happened.

It's just that he's been the first and only credible person to ever come forward to say that he heard explosions constantly going off in WTC7 while he was trapped inside while WTC1 and 2 were falling down. I guess that's all he could say and we have video of him saying it and everything, but I suppose since he's never been under oath about it, which I'm sure he would've had to be when he was going to the grand jury,....

It's been documented and all, but I'm just more interested as in why the cause of his death has been undisclosed. It's just something that interests me.

It could be nothing at all. But...

-TNC

 

[TNC9852002]

Ah, I see a lot of people have seen the fiction that is Loose Change.

Guys...Im sorry...but the "evidence" that shows that the government did it is just not even remotely real. The "expert" who works at the steel company who said the steel wouldnt bend and break like that actually worked in the water treatment division of the company and had no knowledge whatsoever of how steel operates under high temperatures...heck, Loose Change even doctored the photographs of the Pentagon to make the crash site look smaller.

There are numerous websites, and a video that I think is called Screw Loose Change that debunks every claim mad by the conspiracy theoriests. Completely and utterly proves it to be fiction.

Bottom line, Muslim extremists hijacked a couple of planes. It really was that cut and dry.

Was that a general statement or was that aimed directly at me?

Well, either way, I've seen the Loose Change films AND I've seen both of the films that debunk all of their claims and surely, no one here is implying, not even Loose Change, that there is solid evidence to suggest that the government did it.

From my perspective, they showed enough evidence (both weak and strong) and eyewitness testimony (both weak and strong) for you to consider the possibility and for you to make up your mind. Even the debunker videos didn't have the best of counter evidence in a few areas as I vaguely recall (it's been a while since I've watched them all).

In my view, I haven't seen any evidence to support that what they tell me happened did actually happen that way (is anyone watching the videos I'm posting?) and vice versa. That gives me the right to question what my government tells me if I'm confused about something or don't have enough information.

-TNC

 

[TNC9852002]

If someone had told me that the US government blew up the World Trade Center and blamed it on foreign terrorists to incite a war in the Middle East, I'd think there was a possibility that it might be close to true.

However, the Pentagon is the US government's military headquaters. The Department of Defense operates out of the Pentagon. Are you seriously telling me the government sought to incite a war immediately after blowing up a chunk of its own military HQ, and sacrificing 100+ Pentagon employees?

If this was all a massive conspiracy, the two planes in New York would've been enough to send the country into a pro-war rage. The plane in a field in Pennsylvania and the plane into the Pentagon exceed the very concept of overkill.

Well, yeah, it very much seems like overkill, but then, if you were a terrorist, wouldn't you think that hitting the WTC buildings would've been enough? If not, why stop at the White House and the Pentagon? Why not hit CIA headquarters too? The Capitol?

I agree with you at an extent, but, at the same time, I can see how there's this possibility of a rebuttal here.

Hitting the WTC brought in the notion of the American people and their freedom being under attack. Also, if terrorists attacked only the WTC, there wouldn't be the same sort of politic and democratic statement being swung around by politicians if the Pentagon and the White House weren't targets as well.

That's just my opinion or my opinion for the possibility of course.

-TNC

 

[NewYorkSpider]

The only thing I believe is that the one that didn't make it to the White House was shot down That is fine to allow those people to be remembered as heroes that fought to take control of the plane but come on...why would they crash it or not attempt to contact air traffic control to help them land it or tell them what was going on? It was shot down to avoid a risk and covered up to protect the government.

I believe it was shot down as well. I think some lady found a piece of debris 5 miles from the crash site. Can't remember what it was.

 

[The Senator]

[enters thread]

[looks around]

*sigh*

[leaves thread]

 

[Heretic]

Was that a general statement or was that aimed directly at me?

Well, either way, I've seen the Loose Change films AND I've seen both of the films that debunk all of their claims and surely, no one here is implying, not even Loose Change, that there is solid evidence to suggest that the government did it.

From my perspective, they showed enough evidence (both weak and strong) and eyewitness testimony (both weak and strong) for you to consider the possibility and for you to make up your mind. Even the debunker videos didn't have the best of counter evidence in a few areas as I vaguely recall (it's been a while since I've watched them all).

In my view, I haven't seen any evidence to support that what they tell me happened did actually happen that way (is anyone watching the videos I'm posting?) and vice versa. That gives me the right to question what my government tells me if I'm confused about something or don't have enough information.

-TNC

Um...what evidence did Loose Change provide??? Sure, they have tons of anonymous quotes...but what evidence? Every bit of prrof they offer is fiction, plain and simple.