About Craig's face

DA Harvey Dent said:
How do I justify it? its simple really, like I said before the defining characterisitcs are sum total representative of the character. If you're missing one, the entire character is lost.
so...since Keaton didn't have Bruce Wayne's dashingly good looks...he wasn't Batman at all?
 
DorkyFresh said:
so...since Keaton didn't have Bruce Wayne's dashingly good looks...he wasn't Batman at all?

Bruce wayne and batman are two different personas. Your argument and logic are flawed b/c you are combining the two when each has its own distinctive qualities. No, keaton was not bruce wayne, simply b/c he lacked the looks. Batman? yes, b/c of the batsuit, psychology, and intimidating quality (the things needed to be batman) he was batman. Keaton was one persona, but he wasn't the other.
 
Okay they have the Bond Book's look down okay...

Will he be a smoker and be completely obsessive like the book as well?
 
Does anyone else think that with that sloping brow Craig would make a good Caveman.
 
Most Bonds started out looking more youthful then got old-looking. This guy is starting out with the "old" look. Geez....how long before they replace this one?? :huh:
 
A man in ~Bonds job wouldn't look that good anyway..he would be covered in scars..all over his face infact.
 
celldog said:
Most Bonds started out looking more youthful then got old-looking. This guy is starting out with the "old" look. Geez....how long before they replace this one?? :huh:

2011 or 2012 if Craig wants or does quit.
 
According to Fleming, Bond does have a scar in his face in the books. A noticable scar.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"