Nope every word is true. I remember reading an interveiw with him in Fangoria magazine when AvP was in production and he was saying he was making an R rated film and how much a fa nhe was of the first Alien and pedator films and how like those, you weren't going to see them show up for 45 mins.
Unfortanatly Anderson is a liar.
Well they didn't show up for 35-40 minutes. Geez, I don't think the 5 minutes makes him a huge liar. And you know, at Comic-Con 2004, the producers said that they ASSUMED it would get an R at that point as well. Although they hadn't received a rating yet. Like I said, they only removed one F-bomb to get the PG-13. He basically made a movie along the lines of
Aliens in terms of its violence content, and I have little doubt that
Aliens, if produced TODAY, could get a PG-13 if it lost the effs. It's just... not very bloody at all, a fact that kinda shocked me when I started to pay attention. Three scenes of blood, one of which is a bruise on a forehead, one of which is spattered on a window from off-screen, and one of which is a severely toned-down chestburster compared to the original.
I don't think he's ever lied, personally, but I believe that hardcore haters will always find reason to hate him, even if it has to be made up. But every story I've read indicates that, regardless of how you feel about his FILMS, he's a nice guy. Unlike Uwe Boll, who makes lousy films AND is a total uppity dick to people.
Also: The rumors of the supposed "Event Horizons Director's Cut" came from AICN. I'm not sure if they were ever true or not. Who knows, I guess they still could be... I haven't listened to the commentary on the newest DVD, though, to see if he denies (or confirms?) them. I really didn't like that movie enough to revisit it. Meh.