• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Thursday Aug 14, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST. This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

BvS All Things Batman v Superman: An Open Discussion - Part 119

Status
Not open for further replies.
Tonight's Jimmy Fallon thank you note:

Thank you, random dude posting fake photos, for making us reach part 119 unexpectedly.
 
Part 119. Enter Aaron of Paul.

aaron-paul-birthday16.gif
 
Ah, it's just good fun...it's really the sites that are gullible.
 
Not saying it's true, but there are some reasons to believe this.

1. We know they've split the JL movie into two parts, so they're not against to the idea of splitting films.

2. The shoot was long, and they could easily have 2 films worth of stuff.

3. We've all been wondering how they were going to juggle all the characters and plot points. This could explain it.

4. Money. 2 films equals the cash.
 
Not saying it's true, but there are some reasons to believe this.

1. We know they've split the JL movie into two parts, so they're not against to the idea of splitting films.

2. The shoot was long, and they could easily have 2 films worth of stuff.

3. We've all been wondering how they were going to juggle all the characters and plot points. This could explain it.

4. Money. 2 films equals the cash.

1. True but it doesn't mean every film will be cut into two.
2. Every film shoots more than is needed for a hour and a half movie. It's easier to edit a movie down than fill it up.
3. People who know nothing about film worry about too many characters.
 
Not saying it's true, but there are some reasons to believe this.

1. We know they've split the JL movie into two parts, so they're not against to the idea of splitting films.

2. The shoot was long, and they could easily have 2 films worth of stuff.

3. We've all been wondering how they were going to juggle all the characters and plot points. This could explain it.

4. Money. 2 films equals the cash.


We know JL is split into two because WB announced their DC slate with that. If BvS was being split into two we'd have heard about it with that announcement.
 
Not saying it's true, but there are some reasons to believe this.

1. We know they've split the JL movie into two parts, so they're not against to the idea of splitting films.

2. The shoot was long, and they could easily have 2 films worth of stuff.

3. We've all been wondering how they were going to juggle all the characters and plot points. This could explain it.

4. Money. 2 films equals the cash.

You forgot the 6-7 months of editing and special effects-composing.

Or believe some random guy on the internet. :oldrazz:
 
We know JL is split into two because WB announced their DC slate with that. If BvS was being split into two we'd have heard about it with that announcement.

Stop it, Fallen! Nobody wants to hear facts and reasoned thoughts.
 
It would also explain the Super Bowl spot rumor. I'm not too cool to say that I secretly hope something like this would happen. If not then no biggie, but WOULDNT IT BE AWESOME! Just saying, Super Bowl 30 sec spot that ended with that image followed by a trailer the next weekend would be the bomb.
 
It would also explain the Super Bowl spot rumor. I'm not too cool to say that I secretly hope something like this would happen. If not then no biggie, but WOULDNT IT BE AWESOME! Just saying, Super Bowl 30 sec spot that ended with that image followed by a trailer the next weekend would be the bomb.

There's an easy explanation for the Superbowl spot rumor...this movie generates so much interest that website make up click bait news...see also "Trailer comes out in a few weeks" and "Trailer Attached to Hobbit"
 
Like I said, I'm not saying I believe it, guys.

Just playing Devil's Advocate as to why it wouldn't be surprising if it was true.

But I do hope WB says something definitive.
 
Like I said, I'm not saying I believe it, guys.

Just playing Devil's Advocate as to why it wouldn't be surprising if it was true.

But I do hope WB says something definitive.

No harm in being optimistic, but the biggest strike against the pic is very simple - if this was legit, WB legal would have had it taken down within minutes, as it stands the pic has been up for 12 hours or more.
 
Like I said, I'm not saying I believe it, guys.

Just playing Devil's Advocate as to why it wouldn't be surprising if it was true.

But I do hope WB says something definitive.

Charlize Theron has a borderline neck. You ain't, Pacino. :o
 
No harm in being optimistic, but the biggest strike against the pic is very simple - if this was legit, WB legal would have had it taken down within minutes, as it stands the pic has been up for 12 hours or more.

Good point!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"