Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 7
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]504467[/split]
A SuperBowl TV spot costs million dollars so it would be a waste too.I don't doubt how they are gonna do themed TV spots but they most definitely wouldn't be doing it for shows like Gotham or Supergirl.
I mean those tv spots can run during the superbowl instead of wasted like that
A SuperBowl TV spot costs million dollars so it would be a waste too.
An SB spot would have FAR more eyeballs watching it than the ones seeing SUPERGIRL or GOTHAM combined. It wouldn't be a waste just as Marvel putting an A1 spot for the game wasn't a waste. What would be a waste of money would be this idea about putting a spot on two shows whose audience is likely already aware of the movie and has a lot of people making it up that have been following it closely.
A SB spot is less than 3 months before the release and hooks in the wider audience, not just the already keyed in fan audience. On almost every level it's a better use of resources than putting something on those two shows at this time. If anything it helps those shows more than it helps the movie. If this happens I am guessing THAT is more the motivation, much like Marvel airing spots with AOS.
Prepare thyself for disappointmentI will be hugely disappointed if we don't get a new Batman picture on Batman day.
Prepare thyself for disappointment![]()
As for the trailers announcement, I call bs. And not solely on the basis of the source, it just sounds like bs and what would be a bad decision.
Eh, it ain't my money so i'm cool with WB spending on a SB spot. I still talk to folks who don't know there even is a BvS coming out. Let the mr. and mrs. joe schmoe of the world know. Mo' money and mo' DC films for us. Lawd.
Eh, it ain't my money so i'm cool with WB spending on a SB spot. I still talk to folks who don't know there even is a BvS coming out. Let the mr. and mrs. joe schmoe of the world know. Mo' money and mo' DC films for us. Lawd.
If it costs WB nothing, who cares? Fox could be showing that spot for free as stated in their deal with WB for having access to their DCU.An SB spot would have FAR more eyeballs watching it than the ones seeing SUPERGIRL or GOTHAM combined. It wouldn't be a waste just as Marvel putting an A1 spot for the game wasn't a waste. What would be a waste of money would be this idea about putting a spot on two shows whose audience is likely already aware of the movie and has a lot of people making it up that have been following it closely.
A SB spot is less than 3 months before the release and hooks in the wider audience, not just the already keyed in fan audience. On almost every level it's a better use of resources than putting something on those two shows at this time. If anything it helps those shows more than it helps the movie. If this happens I am guessing THAT is more the motivation, much like Marvel airing spots with AOS.
very old. still dumb as hell
Kryptonite writing is pretty inconsistent.
I think those hoping for a Superbowl spot are in for disappointment. WB sits the Superbowl out all the time. Don't see why they'd be compelled to change now. Especially not for a film that's already guaranteed to make them a large sum of money.
Just saying superman minus sun is stupid. Of course if there was no sun he'd be powerless. But there IS sun. Can't get rid of random factors to make one looks better/worse.