Machx72 said:
Damn... Your pics are blurry, but what I can see looks pretty nice.
I've not yet taken an art class, but my point by that statement you quoted is that there are people out there telling others [like I said, usually those who know very little about art] exactly what I'm preaching against with that quote. I have been told by others that you can just make a shape, shade it, and your art will "look good"... Which I've found, and obviously many of you have as well, is not the case.
Thanks for the compliment! I have to learn how to draw the body without a reference, but yeah...one step at a time. I want to go into medical illustration, and all of the applications ask for still-life drawings anyway. They want to see how you observe, which is great for me, since observing is all I really
can do.
Yeah, I know what you mean. I tried one of those "Learn to draw!" books and followed their steps in drawing circles and connecting them, and that doesn't work. What works for almost all artists, though, is blocking out simple shapes to determine general form and proportion, and then modifying those shapes to fit what it actually looks like.
Ditto on the good teachers part. I took art classes at my college, which has a mediocre art program, and then I started taking night classes at a real art school, and man, was there a HUGE difference. Even though they were night classes, they were taught by the regular teachers who really knew what they were doing.
And from my experience, the really cheap student-funded classes don't do much good for learning things. They're good for practice, since most of what the class is is, "Let's play with the material!" but yeah...if you truly want to learn how to DO art, find a good teacher.