NotFadeAway
Superhero
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2003
- Messages
- 5,584
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
When it comes to war cinema, it seems as if the only conflicts that get nods is World War Two, The Vietnam War, the Civil War, and the Revolutionary War. And I understand that, those wars have the most meat on there bones in terms of the reasoning behind the wars, the happenings of the war, the central figures in the war, and the atrocities committed.
World War One isn't the only conflict that gets slighted in cinema and theater, but it is the most important. I understand that it didn't have the political figures, the Atomic Bomb, a villian like Hitler, the pacific conflict, Germany running roughshod, or a President in a wheelchair, but some of the battles should be considered just as historically important, as should the war, and the outcomes of World War One all but directly set the stage for World War Two, which would be a haunting way to end a WW1 feature. And hey, there was genocide during WW1, just ask the Armenians. And with the way the war was fought, one could consider it a grittier fight than WW2.
There are many different routes you could take for a WW1 picture, or television series ala Band of Brothers. The always effective overview film, a feature focusing on trench warfare, the Armenian/Assryain/Pontic Greek genocides, the 100 days offensive, the Rape of Belgium, the Russian Revolution, an overview of the American entry into the war, the Canadian effort during the war, the Southern theatres, U-boats, etc etc. There is plenty of material.
In addition to WW1, I think the Korean War, the Spanish-American War, and the War of 1812 all deserve a movie.
World War One isn't the only conflict that gets slighted in cinema and theater, but it is the most important. I understand that it didn't have the political figures, the Atomic Bomb, a villian like Hitler, the pacific conflict, Germany running roughshod, or a President in a wheelchair, but some of the battles should be considered just as historically important, as should the war, and the outcomes of World War One all but directly set the stage for World War Two, which would be a haunting way to end a WW1 feature. And hey, there was genocide during WW1, just ask the Armenians. And with the way the war was fought, one could consider it a grittier fight than WW2.
There are many different routes you could take for a WW1 picture, or television series ala Band of Brothers. The always effective overview film, a feature focusing on trench warfare, the Armenian/Assryain/Pontic Greek genocides, the 100 days offensive, the Rape of Belgium, the Russian Revolution, an overview of the American entry into the war, the Canadian effort during the war, the Southern theatres, U-boats, etc etc. There is plenty of material.
In addition to WW1, I think the Korean War, the Spanish-American War, and the War of 1812 all deserve a movie.