I worry slightly that this role is too big for Andrew to play, because he's shown, to me at least, that he has phenomenal talent. He was great in Social Network, but simply incredible in Never Let Me Go. And I mean it, his performance in Never Let Me Go just blew my mind.
But now, put him in the shoes of his lifelong superhero, and he screws it all up. It's not totally shocking if he doesn't pull off this role, but I always hoped he could. Now it seems that he's succumbed to the pressure of the task that is maybe too big for him.
In that 40+ second doorman scene, his acting was over-the-top, almost bad. Even the doorman's acting was better. Here's how it went for me:
Setting: Peter, supposedly a bit jittery as he's going to Gwen's rich or high-class apartment for his first time. (As some of Andrew's advocates suggests here's your benefit of the doubt)
*Doorman steps in front of him*
Doorman: Woh, can I help you sir?
Peter: Ye-no-I'm good- I'm going uhh-um.. *fumbles with his backpack* (Terribly and very conspicuously exaggerated. Who stutters that badly? We're never even half as terrified as he seems in our most anxious days. And he's supposed to be a very intelligent and somewhat confident young man. Already very contrasting from his supposed Spidey persona with all that wit, confidence, even charisma)
carrying on...
Doorman: Are you dropping off or picking up?
*For a couple of seconds Peter squints/gazes at the doorman as if he's trying to read words in size 1 font*
(Again terrible. Who does that? Recall your own countless experiences when you didn't understand something someone said the first time. The most you've got was your mouth hanging half-open before your verbal response. Who squints at your fellow conversationalist as if you're counting the hair strands sticking out of his nose?)
Peter: Am I what? (Wow, the first realistic piece of acting here! So it's in green!)
Now that was just the first few seconds of their dialogue and I can't stand to all of the remaining details, which are mostly bad acting on Andrew's part as well. But, here's the worst part of it all:
Doorman: Your name?
*Peter stares ridiculously for a couple of seconds again.. as if he's asked a riddle only Peter Parker's supposedly genius IQ can answer*
Peter: Peter- sorry- Peter Parker- why? (and as he said that look at his body language and gestures. It's as if he (as mentioned above) just solved the riddle and snapped out of deep thought after figuring the answer to the doorman's enigmatic question: "Your name?")
Put how I criticised about his acting in that 40 second scene along with his badly delivered "you think I'm a cop?" scene and it looks like Peter Parker's going to be more of a spastic ****** with some sort of mental and social problem, rather than the genius with a dynamic personality we've all recognised Parker as.
--
Anyway, I want and hope you guys can counter-argue, convince me otherwise and completely change my opinion because I still hope that everything about the movie, Andrew's acting especially, turns out amazing in the film. If not, maybe it'll still be a good thing going to watch the movie with pretty low expectations eh?
Yes, it may look like I'm over-analysing, but that makes it more of an analysis than less.
But now, put him in the shoes of his lifelong superhero, and he screws it all up. It's not totally shocking if he doesn't pull off this role, but I always hoped he could. Now it seems that he's succumbed to the pressure of the task that is maybe too big for him.
In that 40+ second doorman scene, his acting was over-the-top, almost bad. Even the doorman's acting was better. Here's how it went for me:
Setting: Peter, supposedly a bit jittery as he's going to Gwen's rich or high-class apartment for his first time. (As some of Andrew's advocates suggests here's your benefit of the doubt)
*Doorman steps in front of him*
Doorman: Woh, can I help you sir?
Peter: Ye-no-I'm good- I'm going uhh-um.. *fumbles with his backpack* (Terribly and very conspicuously exaggerated. Who stutters that badly? We're never even half as terrified as he seems in our most anxious days. And he's supposed to be a very intelligent and somewhat confident young man. Already very contrasting from his supposed Spidey persona with all that wit, confidence, even charisma)
carrying on...
Doorman: Are you dropping off or picking up?
*For a couple of seconds Peter squints/gazes at the doorman as if he's trying to read words in size 1 font*
(Again terrible. Who does that? Recall your own countless experiences when you didn't understand something someone said the first time. The most you've got was your mouth hanging half-open before your verbal response. Who squints at your fellow conversationalist as if you're counting the hair strands sticking out of his nose?)
Peter: Am I what? (Wow, the first realistic piece of acting here! So it's in green!)
Now that was just the first few seconds of their dialogue and I can't stand to all of the remaining details, which are mostly bad acting on Andrew's part as well. But, here's the worst part of it all:
Doorman: Your name?
*Peter stares ridiculously for a couple of seconds again.. as if he's asked a riddle only Peter Parker's supposedly genius IQ can answer*
Peter: Peter- sorry- Peter Parker- why? (and as he said that look at his body language and gestures. It's as if he (as mentioned above) just solved the riddle and snapped out of deep thought after figuring the answer to the doorman's enigmatic question: "Your name?")
Put how I criticised about his acting in that 40 second scene along with his badly delivered "you think I'm a cop?" scene and it looks like Peter Parker's going to be more of a spastic ****** with some sort of mental and social problem, rather than the genius with a dynamic personality we've all recognised Parker as.
--
Anyway, I want and hope you guys can counter-argue, convince me otherwise and completely change my opinion because I still hope that everything about the movie, Andrew's acting especially, turns out amazing in the film. If not, maybe it'll still be a good thing going to watch the movie with pretty low expectations eh?
Yes, it may look like I'm over-analysing, but that makes it more of an analysis than less.
Last edited: