freemadison
Ben Reilly > You
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2006
- Messages
- 756
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
We agree.Won '08 said:Yes, Ben was developed well, and yes he was "cool".

We don't.Won '08 said:But he simply does not belong in the stories of Peter Parker's life. No more.

I would like to hear your opinion behind both points. The "why".Won '08 said:After the debacle that was the CLone Saga passed I realized the mistakes that were made and in all honesty they need not be made again. Going backwards with ben would be extremely pointless.
I know what you're trying to say. But it's simply not correct. Based on what we KNOW, Jackal said that Ben (or PeterWon '08 said:"Clones don't turn into dust!"
......
Cmon. Different artist, different renditions. But thats neither here or there in this situation.

GLENN GREENBURG said:We knew that with Ben's death, it had to be made abundantly clear who was the original and who was the clone, once and for all. To finally get past this Clone Saga, there could be absolutely no more questions about who was who. Sure, Norman had explained everything earlier in the issue, but he was the BAD GUY! Who could believe anything HE says, right?
Bob Harras suggested that the simplest, most effective, and most dramatic way to resolve this was to have Ben's body experience clone degeneration upon his death. That would prove without a shadow of a doubt, to both Peter and the readers, that Ben had been the clone. Mark Bernardo and I had mentioned to Bob that clone degeneration, as established throughout the entire Clone Saga, didn't really work that way, but Harras's reponse was something along the lines of, "It works that way in this instance." Mark and I just shrugged our shoulders and went along with it.
Yes, but he was the best product of the whole thing. Which I think is the general consensus of the saga. I don't want to see Clone Saga 2. Just Ben *cough*andKaineandBabyMay*cough*.Won '08 said:In all honesty....Ben Reilly was a product of a clone saga gone wrong.
I'm gonna go on the record to state that Amazing #400 was a much better story than PP SM #75 (although I loved Revelations). Ben's death was not as epic as it should have been. And it's not even remembered by the characters. I think that among us "clone-heads" that we hardly feel a sense of "completeness".Won '08 said:His death was epic to me, andj ust like they ruined Aunt May's passing....they would ruin his within his return. It brings a complete end to his story, as it should stay.
We know that. But WE want him back.Won '08 said:Why does Spider-Man need Ben Reilly?
He doesn't.
Maybe, but I will give them my hard-earned money to see it. And I think others will too. He's got his own fan thread for chrissakes.Won '08 said:"Why does marvel need to consider his return?
They don't.
Hey I love Johnny Storm to death but he's got his own family. I think you know who they are. It feels kinda cheap imo, like Spidey is the annoying neighbor (Urkel?) from next door. Ben Reilly was a much closer figure in Parker's life.Won '08 said:Like I said. The sibling factor was established between Peter and Johnny long ago...it's just a shame Marvel's current panel would avoid displaying such a thing.