Arnold Is Back for Terminator 5

Status
Not open for further replies.
By the time this **** comes out Arnold will literally have robotic parts.
 
By the time this **** comes out Arnold will literally have robotic parts.

lol and Cameron would get the rights back. I was rereading the Collider article and it says:

"An interesting tidbit in the story, though, is that per copyright law, the rights to Terminator revert back to James Cameron in 2018. While it seems that Cameron really wants nothing to do with the franchise anymore, if a studio were planning on making Terminator films past that date, Cameron would have to sign off."
 
It's a shame a Robocop vs Terminator movie didn't happen, if it was done in the 90s then it would be seen as one of the crazy action films of the 90s
 
Id wait till 2021 for arnold and cam to make terminator 3.
 
I suppose the real question is, can the series move out of Arnold's shadow? If it can't, might as well retire it.

However, I don't see why not. At its best, the T-1000 was just as menacing as the T-800, if not more so. It was also much more convincing when it pretended to be human. Something the T-800 could never really do.

Ironically, the T-800 is actually fairly obsolete by 21st century standards. The T-X from Terminator 3 actually incorporated some cool features. Too bad it was such a boring character in a mediocre movie.
 
It's a shame a Robocop vs Terminator movie didn't happen, if it was done in the 90s then it would be seen as one of the crazy action films of the 90s


So true. I read it was actually supposed to be made in the 90s but it didn't happen because the studio couldn't find a director. I wish it would've been made in the 90s (along with AVP). Cameron returning to direct and this time sharing directing duties with Paul Verhoeven, Cameron writing it with Neumeier and Miner, Stan Winston (R.I.P.) and Rob Bottin doing the effects together and of course Arnold and Peter Weller back in their respective roles. Sigh, so sad to think about the missed opportunity:csad:

Still, I think Arnold is in decent enough physical shape to do an RVT movie if it were to be made today. I'd much prefer an RVT film to another stand-alone Terminator sequel.
 
though it's way too late to make a live action Robocop vs Terminator film, they can still make an animated film. have Frank Miller and the DC Animation crew involved in some capacity to make it a violent, R rated film.

i'm sure both Peter Weller and Arnold would be down to do voice over work

:awesome:
 
An animated version of it (R-rated of course) would be better than nothing, I'd take it. But I don't think it's impossible to do as a live-action film with Arnold and Weller back.
 
By the time this **** comes out Arnold will literally have robotic parts.

The main issue is probably his face. Alot of people thought he wouldn't be fit for Terminator 3 but he proved them wrong. They could probably use trickery to make him look younger but those tend to always look phony i.e. Tron Legacy with the weird rubber mouth.
 
Arnold's definitely showing his age much more. Digital touch-ups combined with anti-aging make-up will need to be heavily used.
 
Meh! T3 left me cold. TS was slightly better, but not by much. They should just leave this franchise be. Arnold's too old for the role anymore anyway.

Now Conan 3 on the other hand, with Arnold reprising his role as everyones favorite Cimmerian and John Milius back as writer AND director, now THAT I would love to see.
 
So true. I read it was actually supposed to be made in the 90s but it didn't happen because the studio couldn't find a director. I wish it would've been made in the 90s (along with AVP). Cameron returning to direct and this time sharing directing duties with Paul Verhoeven, Cameron writing it with Neumeier and Miner, Stan Winston (R.I.P.) and Rob Bottin doing the effects together and of course Arnold and Peter Weller back in their respective roles. Sigh, so sad to think about the missed opportunity:csad:
Still, I think Arnold is in decent enough physical shape to do an RVT movie if it were to be made today. I'd much prefer an RVT film to another stand-alone Terminator sequel.

I have just actually shed a tear reading that and realising we will never get it, that would have been amazing.

I though Terminator Salvation was awful compared to Terminator 3.
Christian Bale in particular was really bad.

While I didnt think TS was awful, T3 is the better movie of the two for me.
 
I quite liked Salvation, T3 is flat out horrible.

A Robocop vs Terminator movie wouldn't have made sense. The chip and arm in T1 was supposed to be a huge breakthrough. It's not exactly a big deal if there's a cyborg cop walking around.
 
I'm always in the minority with this but I loved Salvation, it felt like a Terminator movie. Whereas T3 was just a joke, weak script, weak acting, even Arnie wasn't impressive. At least Salvation took us closer to the war that we have all wanted to see since the first film.

I think Robocop vs Terminator is better suited to be a classic Megadrive game or comic, or perhaps could of even been a cool looking Anime type film.
 
I'm always in the minority with this but I loved Salvation, it felt like a Terminator movie. Whereas T3 was just a joke, weak script, weak acting, even Arnie wasn't impressive. At least Salvation took us closer to the war that we have all wanted to see since the first film.

The thing is though, it wasn't much of a war. In the opening of Terminator 2 it looks like a jump yard with terminators pew! pew! lasers. In Terminator Salvation it basically looked like mad max, with the batpod, tranformers, Helen Bon Carter as a Max Headroom and other nonesense that looks like a mish-mash from other movies. In Terminator 3 you see skynet start up (that looks and feels connected to the other movies) as well as everything getting it up the butt at the end. In Terminator Salvation you get Christian Bale with his one tone voice trying to get people on valium.
 
The thing is though, it wasn't much of a war. In the opening of Terminator 2 it looks like a jump yard with terminators pew! pew! lasers. In Terminator Salvation it basically looked like mad max, with the batpod, tranformers, Helen Bon Carter as a Max Headroom and other nonesense that looks like a mish-mash from other movies. In Terminator 3 you see skynet start up (that looks and feels connected to the other movies) as well as everything getting it up the butt at the end. In Terminator Salvation you get Christian Bale with his one tone voice trying to get people on valium.

I was talking about the war in The Terminator (1984) war zone. I liked the look and feel of Salvation and I admit there was plenty of plotholes, but at least it tried to connect with the original (again I mean the 1984 version) with having a young Kyle Reese, being bought into the resistance. And not to forget this was origanlly meant to be a trilogy, so the story I imagine was going to expland and lead up to the events which led to the 1984 Terminator.

The problem with Terminator 3 is that it has absolutley no place, it doesn't bring anything to the story, in Judgement Day we got a good logical ending. And the possibility Judgement day had been overted, in T3 we got no explaination just a mere "judgement day was inevitable." - Lazy writing. Then you get a lame Terminator the TX which was just a gimmick to have a female terminator, it was a pathetic atempt at a remake of judgement day. And Claire Danes was terrible in it just wining the whole time. But I do agree the one thing I liked was the robots beginning to uprise that was cool, but too little to save the whole film in my opinion.
 
Aside from a rather limp John Conner and being too much like Terminator 2 than it's own things, I thought Terminator 3 was a pretty good action/sci-fi movie.

Same here, Stahl really needed better material for John Connor, as he is a good actor, but overall I liked him in the role and it was a good action sci-fi. The ending alone was better than anything in Salvation.
 
The ending was great because it meant the movie was over. Salvation was much much much more entertaining overall.

The thing is though, it wasn't much of a war. In the opening of Terminator 2 it looks like a jump yard with terminators pew! pew! lasers. In Terminator Salvation it basically looked like mad max, with the batpod, tranformers, Helen Bon Carter as a Max Headroom and other nonesense that looks like a mish-mash from other movies. In Terminator 3 you see skynet start up (that looks and feels connected to the other movies) as well as everything getting it up the butt at the end. In Terminator Salvation you get Christian Bale with his one tone voice trying to get people on valium.

You forgot all the HILARIOUS jokes in T3, inaccurate statements, and a cyborg having an orgasm.
 
Ahh yes jokes like the 'sunglasses' bit and the "talk to the hand" - phenomenal!
 
I don't see what was bad about that. To someone who has no idea about Terminator movies, it will be "haha he looks goofy". For fans of Terminators it's a clear play on "I need your cloths, your boots and your motorcycle". The glasses was very little diffrent from alot of the peppered humor in Terminator 2. Terminator Salvation didn't have any humor from what I could see. A fairly joyless movie. It's main callback was a bad looking CGI Arnie.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"