TheCorpulent1
SHAZAM!
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2001
- Messages
- 154,474
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
People have survived bullets to the head before.
People have survived bullets to the head before.
People have been shot in the head before in real and survived. Some become handicapped, some in comas, some are lucky and are okay. None the less they survived.
And again, being shot in the chest is nowhere near as ugly or violent as Spoiler and Sue Dibny's death.
Now you're just splitting hairs.
like the fact that Peter & MJ had a child that was stillborn; you'd think that a guy who STILL obsesses about the death of his college fiance would maybe even recall the death of a first child, but F that, it "makes him seem older", as one writer or editor justified omitting it put it
My point was that nowadays NO CHARACTER'S DEATH is allowed to be of natural causes and be as poignant
We have people who claim that her death in ASM #400 was a great comic years later, who still are miffed at the "actress" baloney that Mackie came up with to revive her (and that all but abandoned her character anyway).
JMS wants us to have some gasping emotional reaction to May getting shot, but I just feel numb. She's been killed off before in more dignified fashion, and it's become a bad joke to have death after death after death after death in comics. I literally read that panel and thought, "Oh, AGAIN!?"
He's not comparing the gratuity of the violent deaths. He's pointing out the fact of violent deaths at all.And again, being shot in the chest is nowhere near as ugly or violent as Spoiler and Sue Dibny's death.
This is a GREAT point. They should have added this to the Spider-Man mythos and it should be as powerful as when anyone mentions Gwen. My memory is foggy, however. Didn't Norman take the baby and fool Peter & MJ in to thinking she was stillborn? How was that resolved or am I remembering it wrong?
/QUOTE]
your memory serves correctly its just that the quesada administation prefers to keep miss parker in an alternate timeline to avoid pigeonholeing spider-man into a DEFINITE future
![]()
He's not comparing the gratuity of the violent deaths. He's pointing out the fact of violent deaths at all.
If it were comparing the gratuity, it would be an entirely different conversation. "DC rapes its characters and tortures them! They're so much more violent!!" and not "Both companies resort to violence!! It's so tacky!"