The Amazing Spider-Man ASM Blu-ray: Most Wanted Features and Extras

[©KAW]

And those two extra films could see, as I said, Peter finding the killer and letting him go bud

That's an "IF" what I'm saying to you is "FACT" already on film.

How cute that that is what you got out of my reply.

You compared it to a movie that has two extra films ahead of it, to tell its story of Ben's killer. What else am I suppose to get out of it?

 

[Anno_Domini]

That's an "IF" what I'm saying to you is "FACT" already on film.

They're both "IF"'s. Peter could find the killer and take him to the police, Peter could find the killer and let him go. The only "FACTS" on film is that Peter let Sandman go in Spider-Man 3 and that Peter didn't find the killer and seemingly let the vendetta towards Ben's killer go in The Amazing Spider-Man.

You compared it to a movie that has two extra films ahead of it, to tell its story of Ben's killer. What else am I suppose to get out of it?

I only compared what we see in TAS-M and what we saw in S-M 3. One film had the killer go free, but the other film had the killer not even found; it doesn't matter what happens in the future as I am only bringing up what happened in the film we saw so far. I know what could happen in the later installments, but I'm only saying what we know of so far and you made it seem like I don't know what could happen in a sequel when it's ridiculous to think I'm that dumb.

 

[Mike]

it's ridiculous to think I'm that dumb.

lol does anyone else want to take this one. Dude who says that pete is going to let him go. He'll turn him to the police and will probably refrain from killing him. This parker's not going to accept the burglars apology lol and let him go free . He more than likely is going to jail or be the cause of his own demise.

 

[Anno_Domini]

lol does anyone else want to take this one. Dude who says that pete is going to let him go. He'll turn him to the police and will probably refrain from killing him. This parker's not going to accept the burglars apology lol and let him go free . He more than likely is going to jail or be the cause of his own demise.

Because you know exactly what's going to happen, huh? Your idea on what could happen is still speculation as much as what I think could happen.

But, I'll take the high road and not respond to the "lol does anyone else want to take this one."

 

[Mike]

Because you know exactly what's going to happen, huh? Your idea on what could happen is still speculation as much as what I think could happen.

But, I'll take the high road and not respond to the "lol does anyone else want to take this one."

you kinda already did. ;-)

 

[AF3619]

 

[©KAW]

They're both "IF"'s. Peter could find the killer and take him to the police, Peter could find the killer and let him go. The only "FACTS" on film is that Peter let Sandman go in Spider-Man 3 and that Peter didn't find the killer and seemingly let the vendetta towards Ben's killer go in The Amazing Spider-Man.

I only compared what we see in TAS-M and what we saw in S-M 3. One film had the killer go free, but the other film had the killer not even found; it doesn't matter what happens in the future as I am only bringing up what happened in the film we saw so far. I know what could happen in the later installments, but I'm only saying what we know of so far and you made it seem like I don't know what could happen in a sequel when it's ridiculous to think I'm that dumb.

I don't think you're dumb, but you do seem like a very confused individual. Why even comment on Ben's killer not being caught, when the full story hasn't even played itself out on screen yet?

 

[Anno_Domini]

you kinda already did. ;-)

Sure man, sure

I feel like my mind is doing just that when replying to certain individuals, haha.

I don't think you're dumb, but you do seem like a very confused individual. Why even comment on Ben's killer not being caught, when the full story hasn't even played itself out on screen yet?

Confused individual? No, that would be you when both origin films share a lot of resemblance even with the real killer not having been caught. Also saying that by the end of this trilogy, this Peter could pull exactly the same and just let the killer go.

 

[Mike]

lol awesome gif.

 

[Mike]

Sure man, sure



I feel like my mind is doing just that when replying to certain individuals, haha.



Confused individual? No, that would be you when both origin films share a lot of resemblance even with the real killer not having been caught. Also saying that by the end of this trilogy, this Peter could pull exactly the same and just let the killer go.

you must really hate this movie. You should put all this energy into something useful. You ever try coming up with youre own fan fiction for a spider-man film? Hell, even post it up on the forums so we all can read it.

 

[Anno_Domini]

you must really hate this movie. You should put all this energy into something useful. You ever try coming up with youre own fan fiction for a spider-man film? Hell, even post it up on the forums so we all can read it.

Talking about how I don't view TAS-M as a great film in the Spidey boards is much better than talking trash about TDKR in the Spidey boards

And...how is creating fan fiction anymore useful? That's not my thing and in no way would I consider that being called "useful".

 

[Mike]

Talking about how I don't view TAS-M as a great film in the Spidey boards is much better than talking trash about TDKR in the Spidey boards

And...how is creating fan fiction anymore useful? That's not my thing and in no way would I consider that being called "useful".

We are talking about guys in tight flamboyant costumes. In no way should we ever get upset or argue over this. I may have told you to shut up. I apologize for that. Youre a good guy... you just have bad taste in movies...imo ;-) lol

 

[©KAW]

Confused individual? No, that would be you when both origin films share a lot of resemblance even with the real killer not having been caught. Also saying that by the end of this trilogy, this Peter could pull exactly the same and just let the killer go.

That's speculation on your part, how about we wait and see what actually happens. But what is fact right now, the origin was told and butchered in the previous films, killing the With Great Power...motif dead, or are you going to go to that dark place again, and pretend that SM3 never happened?

 

[Mike]

or are you going to go to that dark place again, and pretend that SM3 never happened?

http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w307/Jakemyheart/JackScream.gif

 

[UltimateWebhead]

S-M 2 -> S-M 1 -> TAS-M -> S-M 3

In your rankings just swap SM1 with TAS-M and you have my list. We're not so far off in our opinions.

 

[Anno_Domini]

We are talking about guys in tight flamboyant costumes. In no way should we ever get upset or argue over this. I may have told you to shut up. I apologize for that. Youre a good guy... you just have bad taste in movies...imo ;-) lol

I definitely feel the same way about you, lol.

But, hey, as long as you understand that it's far more useless to trash a Batman film over in the Spidey boards, then I'm sore more than half of our arguments will end.

That's speculation on your part, how about we wait and see what actually happens. But what is fact right now, the origin was told and butchered in the previous films, killing the With Great Power...motif dead, or are you going to go to that dark place again, and pretend that SM3 never happened?

So it'll be just as ridiculous to say Peter will bring the killer to justice quite yet then, correct?

Sam Raimi made two great films, and those two films are what I remember Raimi's Spidey films by. Much as how I remember '89 Batman over any other Burton/Schumacher film, or Superman I and II over III, IV and Superman Returns.

So, sure, if you want to say I pretend S-M 3 doesn't exist, go ahead

 

[Anno_Domini]

In your rankings just swap SM1 with TAS-M and you have my list. We're not so far off in our opinions.

I do enjoy more parts of the first hour in TAS-M over S-M 1, I'll give TAS-M that, but overall the re-doing of the origin and the villain is the reason why TAS-M isn't above S-M 1.

 

[A Necessary Evil]

TASM also took too many notes out of Raimi's already written book, though let's be honest; the Gwen/Peter moments were class.

 

[©KAW]

So it'll be just as ridiculous to say Peter will bring the killer to justice quite yet then, correct?

That's why I said let's wait and see.

Sam Raimi made two great films, and those two films are what I remember Raimi's Spidey films by. Much as how I remember '89 Batman over any other Burton/Schumacher film, or Superman I and II over III, IV and Superman Returns.

So, sure, if you want to say I pretend S-M 3 doesn't exist, go ahead

Yeah, but those other films don't hold a huge part of their hero's true origin story, SM3 does.

 

[Anno_Domini]

That's why I said let's wait and see.

Yeah, but those other films don't hold their hero's true origin story, SM3 does.

Peter is bitten by a spider, check.

Uncle Ben's killed, check.

Spider-Man 3 only added Sandman as the real killer and over portrays the 'forgiveness' theme through the film and that doesn't really hold the hero's true origin at all, just gives the viewers a retcon that can be thrown out if one doesn't even enjoy the third film.

 

[Mike]

Peter is bitten by a spider, check.

Uncle Ben's killed, check.

Spider-Man 3 only added Sandman as the real killer and over portrays the 'forgiveness' theme through the film and that doesn't really hold the hero's true origin at all, just gives the viewers a retcon that can be thrown out if one doesn't even enjoy the third film.

huh? No...the 3rd film goes back to the first film stating that sandman accidentally killed uncle ben. Basically holding raimis origin of spidey. Dont act like sm3 didnt happen. That sh## was canonical. Lol

 

[Anno_Domini]

huh? No...the 3rd film goes back to the first film stating that sandman accidentally killed uncle ben. Basically holding raimis origin of spidey. Dont act like sm3 didnt happen. That sh## was canonical. Lol

And yet the first film didn't even bother to suggest Caradine(sp?) even had a partner in crime. One can choose not to be bothered by a film's action if it only creates a retcon that makes no sense. A retcon destroys canon, thus S-M 3 is something that has the capability of not even being related to past films if one doesn't like retcons from the get-go.

 

[Mike]

And yet the first film didn't even bother to suggest Caradine(sp?) even had a partner in crime. One can choose not to be bothered by a film's action if it only creates a retcon that makes no sense. A retcon destroys canon, thus S-M 3 is something that has the capability of not even being related to past films if one doesn't like retcons from the get-go.

just stop...lol sm3 happened and sandman was uncle bens killer in the raimi universe. All 3 films are connected and are by the same director. Raimi didnt pull a damn evil dead. All of these films follow each other and are canonical. Smh.

 

[A Necessary Evil]

huh? No...the 3rd film goes back to the first film stating that sandman accidentally killed uncle ben. Basically holding raimis origin of spidey. Dont act like sm3 didnt happen. That sh## was canonical. Lol

.....you didnt.lol sm3 never happened.

http://forums.superherohype.com/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=24463797

t:

Pot, meet kettle. Again.

 

[Mike]

http://forums.superherohype.com/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=24463797

t:

Pot, meet kettle. Again.

that was me joking notice the "Lol" but pretty good attempt.