• Super Maintenance

    Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates.

    Starting January 9th, site maintenance is ongoing until further notice, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into.

    We apologize for the inconvenience.

Assigning budgets to future marvel films...

KangConquers

Purple Kang, Purple Kang
Joined
Jul 1, 2004
Messages
7,153
Reaction score
7
Points
33
Not that I'm encouraging cheaply made movies, but what Marvel movies could and should be done for under 100 million? what would you give these movies, in terms of budget?

Avengers (200 million): This is the film that counts...they have to put all the marbles into this one, or else it will suck. As long as it's good, it'll make back it's budget, and make a huge profit through overseas tickets, and video rentals, though I'm hoping it can cross 400 million worldwide.

Ant-Man (55 million): Obviously, there's a bit of snickering about the idea of this movie period. I'm not sure if it'd be a better idea to have it be on a lower budget, or to pump a decent amount of money into it. If they don't pump the money in, it'll be a complete piece of crap, but if they do, they might lose money.

Black Panther (70 million): I like T'Challa a lot, and think Black Panther has potential to be a very good film, but I can't see it costing more than 75million, and that's high balling it. It's the type of film that a very skillful director could do on much less.

Captain America (180 million): This one has to be all out; this is the biggest character Marvel still has the rights to, and they'd better make it count. With the right angle on it (i.e. an intelligent script with the complexity of Brubaker's current run) we could be looking at Marvel's best chance to make a truly great film.

Dr. Strange (110 million...as long as they cast a Strange who can draw crowds): This is a tough one; obviously, a Doctor Strange film would benefit immensely from a higher budget (think about the visual effects in battles between Dormammu and Strange on the Astral Plane), but at the same time, Strange is a very tough sell. If they worked the right angle on it though, I could see it being a success.

Hawkeye (35 million): Let's be honest; this movie shouldn't even be made. Hawkeye's solo adventures are few and far between, and none of them scream must see movie. I don't know who they think the audience for this one is. Keep it cheap and it might make money.

Iron Fist (35 million): This is a no-brainer. I think that everything in this could be done for under 50 million.

Luke Cage (35 million): Since they've already said this is going to be a typical "black guy" film, I see no reason for extreme special effects, since it sounds like he's going to be a bullet proof Shaft.

Nick Fury (110 million): As long as Iron Man is a big hit, Nick Fury has two big things going for it; 1. The Iron Man connection 2. Samuel L Mother****in' Jackson. It also helps that The Fury character isn't hard to swallow at all. Outside of being 90-something, there's very little about Nick Fury that isn't realistic, so a big action film would work just fine.)

Thor (180 million): Thor has the advantage/ disadvantage of being both a fantasy property and a superhero one. If they can walk the proper line, this could be a huge success given the fantasy movie boom post-LOTR. Yeah, I'm aware Stardust flopped, but that doesn't mean Thor will.

remember...as long as good movies are made, people will go see them. Also note that these budgets aren't based on just what movies I think will do the most money, but also what movies need the most money to be good (for example, you can make a good Black Panther movie on a 70 million dollar budget, but Doctor Strange on 70 million would be terrible.)
 
You know technically ,any big budget Marvel movie involving big VFX sequences can be done for 150 million if they decided to use the Lucas/300 way of shooting against a blue/green screen. Most of the budget can be used for the VFX.
However i doubt many directors , actors and studios are willing to do that.
 
do we know for sure that all of those movies are going to be made?
I know everyone loves to pick on how DC puts out one movie every nine years, but are some of those titles even needed? It seems like they are just throwing money away
 
Not that I'm encouraging cheaply made movies, but what Marvel movies could and should be done for under 100 million? what would you give these movies, in terms of budget?
Avengers (200 million):

200 is a bit modest... 230 minimum.

Ant-Man (55 million): Obviously, there's a bit of snickering about the idea of this movie period. I'm not sure if it'd be a better idea to have it be on a lower budget, or to pump a decent amount of money into it. If they don't pump the money in, it'll be a complete piece of crap, but if they do, they might lose money.

Eh... just save the character for Avengers... it won't make anything as a solo movie

Black Panther (70 million): I like T'Challa a lot, and think Black Panther has potential to be a very good film, but I can't see it costing more than 75million, and that's high balling it. It's the type of film that a very skillful director could do on much less.

Little too high for me... keep it around 55

Captain America (180 million): This one has to be all out; this is the biggest character Marvel still has the rights to, and they'd better make it count. With the right angle on it (i.e. an intelligent script with the complexity of Brubaker's current run) we could be looking at Marvel's best chance to make a truly great film.

Way too high.... the movie won't do anything overseas.... you can do it for 125 million

Iron Fist (35 million): This is a no-brainer. I think that everything in this could be done for under 50 million.
Luke Cage (35 million): Since they've already said this is going to be a typical "black guy" film, I see no reason for extreme special effects, since it sounds like he's going to be a bullet proof Shaft.

I'd just prefer a heroes for hire 60 million movie.

Nick Fury (110 million): As long as Iron Man is a big hit, Nick Fury has two big things going for it; 1. The Iron Man connection 2. Samuel L Mother****in' Jackson. It also helps that The Fury character isn't hard to swallow at all. Outside of being 90-something, there's very little about Nick Fury that isn't realistic, so a big action film would work just fine

If its ultimate just ditch the SHIELD movie.


Thor (180 million): Thor has the advantage/ disadvantage of being both a fantasy property and a superhero one. If they can walk the proper line, this could be a huge success given the fantasy movie boom post-LOTR. Yeah, I'm aware Stardust flopped, but that doesn't mean Thor will.

remember...as long as good movies are made, people will go see them. Also note that these budgets aren't based on just what movies I think will do the most money, but also what movies need the most money to be good (for example, you can make a good Black Panther movie on a 70 million dollar budget, but Doctor Strange on 70 million would be terribl

Star Dust had an asanine release date... this won't... 150 million at least.
 
200 is a bit modest... 230 minimum.



Eh... just save the character for Avengers... it won't make anything as a solo movie



Little too high for me... keep it around 55



Way too high.... the movie won't do anything overseas.... you can do it for 125 million



I'd just prefer a heroes for hire 60 million movie.



If its ultimate just ditch the SHIELD movie.



Star Dust had an asanine release date... this won't... 150 million at least.

230 is too high. I'd do 200 for #1, and bump the budget for 2 if it's a success.

Saying Captain America will do nothing overseas is foolish. Captain America has sold over 200 million comics. Those reciepts came from 70 different countries.

Cap can afford the 180 million price tag.

Marvel is already commited to putting out Ant-Man and Nick Fury films. I'm hoping the Avengers aren't the ultimate avengers anyway, so...
 
230 is too high. I'd do 200 for #1, and bump the budget for 2 if it's a success.

Saying Captain America will do nothing overseas is foolish. Captain America has sold over 200 million comics. Those reciepts came from 70 different countries.

Cap can afford the 180 million price tag.

Marvel is already commited to putting out Ant-Man and Nick Fury films. I'm hoping the Avengers aren't the ultimate avengers anyway, so...

I just think the investment of 160+ if not 180 for a character like Iron Man is irresponsible... I may be in the minority... but the film will be lucky to break 190 domestically IMO. Unless its really good, and I just wasn't impressed by the trailer... that can all change of course. Plus you don't really need to go crazy crazy on the effects for Captain America... Transformers was only 150 million!!! That is just mind boggling to me. You can do a Cap film for 130... 150 if you want to push it. As far as Ant Man and Fury... well if 2008 isn't a 400 million type deal for Hulk/IM combined... Marvel will only be fooling themselves investing big money in lesser characters. Avengers needs to have the most massive budget of all comic book filmss to date other than SM3... X3 was in the 200 million range if not more. With the kind of cast and production you need for that kind of film... there is no way around an insanely high budget.
 
200 is a bit modest... 230 minimum.

That's way too high for a first outing. I think even $200 million is too high from a business standpoint. Remember that Marvel is making this film with it's own studio. If Avengers doesn't perform well, and especially with a $200 million budget, then it'll hurt future Marvel films.
 
That's way too high for a first outing. I think even $200 million is too high from a business standpoint. Remember that Marvel is making this film with it's own studio. If Avengers doesn't perform well, and especially with a $200 million budget, then it'll hurt future Marvel films.

Iron Man has a 190 million budget; do you really think Avengers will have a smaller budget?
 
The following are the only properties I really care about on this list...

Avengers (200 million): This is the film that counts...they have to put all the marbles into this one, or else it will suck. As long as it's good, it'll make back it's budget, and make a huge profit through overseas tickets, and video rentals, though I'm hoping it can cross 400 million worldwide.

Black Panther (70 million): I like T'Challa a lot, and think Black Panther has potential to be a very good film, but I can't see it costing more than 75million, and that's high balling it. It's the type of film that a very skillful director could do on much less.

Captain America (180 million): This one has to be all out; this is the biggest character Marvel still has the rights to, and they'd better make it count. With the right angle on it (i.e. an intelligent script with the complexity of Brubaker's current run) we could be looking at Marvel's best chance to make a truly great film.

Dr. Strange (110 million...as long as they cast a Strange who can draw crowds): This is a tough one; obviously, a Doctor Strange film would benefit immensely from a higher budget (think about the visual effects in battles between Dormammu and Strange on the Astral Plane), but at the same time, Strange is a very tough sell. If they worked the right angle on it though, I could see it being a success.


Nick Fury (110 million): As long as Iron Man is a big hit, Nick Fury has two big things going for it; 1. The Iron Man connection 2. Samuel L Mother****in' Jackson. It also helps that The Fury character isn't hard to swallow at all. Outside of being 90-something, there's very little about Nick Fury that isn't realistic, so a big action film would work just fine.)

Thor (180 million): Thor has the advantage/ disadvantage of being both a fantasy property and a superhero one. If they can walk the proper line, this could be a huge success given the fantasy movie boom post-LOTR. Yeah, I'm aware Stardust flopped, but that doesn't mean Thor will.

remember...as long as good movies are made, people will go see them. Also note that these budgets aren't based on just what movies I think will do the most money, but also what movies need the most money to be good (for example, you can make a good Black Panther movie on a 70 million dollar budget, but Doctor Strange on 70 million would be terrible.)
 
i guess we'll see how things turn out.. but I fear for Thor, now that Marvel films brass want him to trim the projected budget in half.. the story may get butchered..
 
i guess we'll see how things turn out.. but I fear for Thor, now that Marvel films brass want him to trim the projected budget in half.. the story may get butchered..

This is dark news indeed.

God, can you imagine how cool the 300 million dollar script must have been?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Members online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
201,243
Messages
21,929,000
Members
45,725
Latest member
alwaysgrateful9
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"