Batman Vs. Spider-Man

Who Would Win In A Battle?

  • Batman

  • Spider-Man


Results are only viewable after voting.
Bane couldn't touch Electro, Sandman or Hydro-man. Literally. The goblins and Ock would school him too. Nevermind what Connors would do to him.

However, Bane vs. Tombstone or the Kingpin would be something to see.
 
Morlun and The Black Tarantula wouldn't even notice Bane was hitting them.
 
Bane couldn't touch Electro, Sandman or Hydro-man. Literally. The goblins and Ock would school him too. Nevermind what Connors would do to him.

However, Bane vs. Tombstone or the Kingpin would be something to see.

Sandman? Who needs Bane against Sandman, just get Clayface. Clayface would just have to stand there and Sandman would be defeated without Clayface moving at all, he would absorb Sandman. Literally.

And come on, Spider-Man has defeated Electro, Hydro-Man, Doctor Octopus, the goblins, Tombstone and Kingpin many times, Banes strength greatly outweighs Spider-Mans, his only weakness is his Venom tubes.
 
Sandman? Who needs Bane against Sandman, just get Clayface. Clayface would just have to stand there and Sandman would be defeated without Clayface moving at all, he would absorb Sandman. Literally.

And come on, Spider-Man has defeated Electro, Hydro-Man, Doctor Octopus, the goblins, Tombstone and Kingpin many times, Banes strength greatly outweighs Spider-Mans, his only weakness is his Venom syrum tubes.

When has Bane lifted anything in the 10-ton range?
 
I was talking more about in the fighting sense, I doubt Spider-Man would have a 10 ton range weight behind his punch.
 
Wow, I don't know if there's a fail macro on the entire internet failsey enough for Nate's posts.
 
I'm pretty sure Bane would destroy any Spider-Man rogue that isn't symbiotic.

dear me.


Bane vs goblin
Goblin is about 10 times stronger, goblin wins.

Bane vs ock
Ocks arms about 10 times stronger plus massive reach advantage, ock wins

bane vs electro
bane grabs electro, bane fries, the end

bane vs rhino
rhino throws down with the hulk on occaision bane loses badly.

bane vs sandman
see rhino, also added annoyance of sand in banes shoes.


i could go on but you don't seem to know enough about spidey to be convinced.
 
dear me.


Bane vs goblin
Goblin is about 10 times stronger, goblin wins.

Bane vs ock
Ocks arms about 10 times stronger plus massive reach advantage, ock wins

bane vs electro
bane grabs electro, bane fries, the end

bane vs rhino
rhino throws down with the hulk on occaision bane loses badly.

bane vs sandman
see rhino, also added annoyance of sand in banes shoes.


i could go on but you don't seem to know enough about spidey to be convinced.

Marvel fan boy I take it? Why don't you put in Aunt May too and say she is 5 times stronger than Bane.. :whatever:
 
I love both Bats and Spidey, but Spidey would pwn Batman in a fight.
 
Marvel fan boy I take it? Why don't you put in Aunt May too and say she is 5 times stronger than Bane.. :whatever:

No, I just like comics.

Why would i put aunt may in? She doesn't have super strength.


Why are you ignoring the fact that the majority of spidey's rogues are far stronger than bane? Why choose to respond with a glib remark rather than an actual argument of substance?

Try giving some evidence than blindly and foolishily insisting you're correct.
 
No, I just like comics.

Why would i put aunt may in? She doesn't have super strength.


Why are you ignoring the fact that the majority of spidey's rogues are far stronger than bane? Why choose to respond with a glib remark rather than an actual argument of substance?

Try giving some evidence than blindly and foolishily insisting you're correct.

Nearly every Spider-Man rogue has Super Human Strength. And by that, you decide that every Spider-Man rogue is stronger than Bane. Even though Bane can reach unknown levels of Super Human Strength through the quantity of Venom he uses..
 
Im pretty sure he wouldnt. :word:

You remind me too much of my coworker... Too narrow-minded to really give the question any real thought.

With the question of prep time, I don't know, really. I know that, if given prep time, I don't think Spider-Man would stand a chance. However, without prep time, I do think the battle would be much more of a blur in deciding the victor- but as I said, Batman has, from what I've heard, been widely regarded as one of the most intelligent characters in comics. Also, as I said in my first post, no amount of ability can defeat the right amount of intelligence. While I won't deny that Peter is quite intelligent, I'd have to say that edge would go to Batman.

As far as Bane goes, gildea, have you researched/read about Bane at all? He's a not just incredibly strong (which I don't know that any exact numbers have been given, and I don't know much but, would you have any exact numbers on the amounts your villains could lift?) but also a very smart and tactical fighter- again, back to the high amounts of intelligence.

Sure, you might be able to rip someone apart with your bare hands. However, if you're not quick enough to catch him/her, or smart enough to figure out your opponents tactics as quickly as your opponent can figure out yours, you're done for.
 
You remind me too much of my coworker... Too narrow-minded to really give the question any real thought.
.

Dude, please; I've been having this debate on and on for nearly the past ten years. I've given it PLENTY of thought.

At the end of the day,the majority of Batman's major rogues are normal humans. The majority of Spider-Man's are enhanced meta-humans. Spider-Man is ridiculously stronger, more resilient, embarassingly faster, and argueabley as smart as Bruce Wayne.

And if prep time were a factor, then either Norman Osborn, Wilson Fisk, Otto Octavius, or Roderick KIngsley would have murdered Spider-Man a long time ago.

Batman is completely out-classed here. Nothing for Bat fans to be embarassed or angry about. Just a simple fact. :word:
 
I remember reading Batman comics in the 70's and 80's (pre Dark Knight) when Batman was a cool super-hero but he had flaws and could be beaten.

But at some point during the late 80's/early 90's, the mentality around Batman is that he's practically invincible and can beat anybody, including Jesus, with a given amount of prep time. This "look" on Batman has definitely soured my feelings towards him because I like my heroes to not be so "perfect"... yet this prevailing attitude towards Batman over the last 20 years has made people think he can beat anybody when the reality is... sometimes, he can't... just like there are some foes that Spider-Man cannot beat, nor Superman, nor <fill-in-the-blank>...

Batman "was" a great super-hero (in concept) when I was kid, but nowadays, where people think that Batman Begins was the "greatest" super-hero film ever made and that batty can beat God, he seems less likeable to me.

Just my two cents...

:csad:
 
Dude, please; I've been having this debate on and on for nearly the past ten years. I've given it PLENTY of thought.

Only 10 years?

I woulda thought it was more like 20 or 30... :woot:

:cwink:
 
going back to intelligence, i think spidey is a character who tries very hard to figure things out, sometimes too hard as evidece by his emotional development & personal struggle (THIS CAN BE SAID FOR A LOT OF COMICBOOK CHARACTERS) & that can be a hindrance...

things seem to come naturally to batman.... NOT ALWAYS MIND YOU! ! ! !

i dunno i mean spiderman is superstrong & amazingly fast, but batman also has strength & can use gadgets to his advantage

the bat is a character that i think finds his opponent's weaknesses & expkoits it until he wins.... i mean in Knightfall if he hadn't been tired & weakened & drained, BANE would have never had an opportunity to break his back.


The bat is someone who if you kick him when he’s down, THEN YOU BETTER HOPE YOU KILL HIM BUDDY, because he’ll come back to kick your ass 10 fold….

To even compare these two, you hafta look @ what makes them different… a contrast if you will

BATMAN & Spiderman see the world differently

I think overall it would be a long, drawn out, HELL OF A FIGHT, but WHEN ALL IS SAID & DONE batman will win!
 
As far as Bane goes, gildea, have you researched/read about Bane at all? He's a not just incredibly strong (which I don't know that any exact numbers have been given, and I don't know much but, would you have any exact numbers on the amounts your villains could lift?) but also a very smart and tactical fighter- again, back to the high amounts of intelligence.

I think you're giving Bane's strength way too much credit. Bane only beat the Batman because he tackled him when he was worn out from fighting the slew of villains Bane released from Arkham.

If Bane was so good, he could have tackled Batman at his peak condition. Then he could claim a real victory over beating Batman physically. Assuming he'd beat Batman, of course.

What great victories has Bane got in the fighting stakes? What great physical opponent has he beaten? I can't think of any. Killer Croc, I think. But he's just a poor man's version of The Lizard.
 
I think you're giving Bane's strength way too much credit. Bane only beat the Batman because he tackled him when he was worn out from fighting the slew of villains Bane released from Arkham.

If Bane was so good, he could have tackled Batman at his peak condition. Then he could claim a real victory over beating Batman physically. Assuming he'd beat Batman, of course.

What great victories has Bane got in the fighting stakes? What great physical opponent has he beaten? I can't think of any.

Exactly. In the recent Gotham Underground series, Bane even got out-manuevered by the Scarecrow...THE SCARECROW! :grin:
 
Batman "was" a great super-hero (in concept) when I was kid, but nowadays, where people think that Batman Begins was the "greatest" super-hero film ever made and that batty can beat God, he seems less likeable to me.

I don't know what you have against Batman Begins, I thought the movie went out of its way to portray the character as actually being fallible and passably human.
 
I don't know what you have against Batman Begins, I thought the movie went out of its way to portray the character as actually being fallible and passably human.

Actually, I really liked Batman Begins, and as you stated, it did show Bruce being flawed (I was disappointed that he basically got all his gadgets from Lucious Fox, but that's another story)... I openly admit to not liking the repetative "cool car" comments, but it was still an excellent film nonetheless.

However, I just wouldn't call BB the "greatest super-hero film" ever made... like some others I've seen around these boards.

But that's just my two cents...

:yay:
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"