For the second time is not lying, just disguising with more memorable (but absurd) words the simple fact that someone decided to just change the theme.
Ah, ok. But I haven't seen a quote or anything even resembling evidence to back up your claim. I am sure however that it's just a slight oversight on your part and in your next post you'll share this valuable information and enlighten us how you can possibly see through this ruse.
In all seriousness, you have no evidence to prove your claims.
On the other hand, we have two pieces of evidence prove your claim is insofar incorrect.
First, the score itself. There is the HINT of a theme in the score, but it isn't a complete theme. We hear a lot of repetitions, a theme building to something, alluding to something, but the theme never reaches a crescendo.
Its similar to the prequel trilogy, where we hear the first few notes of the Imperial March occasionally, but it is only later in the trilogy that we hear a full fledged Imperial March theme. No, it wasn't a new theme changed out of "boredom" as you --to be frank -- ridiculously claim.
Of course, the second piece of evidence is from the composer's mouth. Sure, he could be lying, or whatever nicer way you put it. But when the movie comes out, and if there is a whole new theme, he would be proven to be a liar, and they won't use the nicer term you came up with to describe his supposed charade.
That doesn't need clairvoyance. It's pretty obvious.
How can it be obvious when there is absolutely NOTHING to support your theory? Rather smug don't you think to assume we take your word over actual evidence.