• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

Bought/Thought 9/26

I think Slott should be EIC when Joey Fatts retire from the position, it trips me out how some are calling Slott a hypocrite for taking the dark route with Slapstick. Just look at Slott's handling of Slapstick versus Jenkins, its clear Dan knows these characters and is simply a better writer. Jenkins' hackneyed back-up stories in CW/WWH Frontline is just painful to read.

To be fair, Slott has more time to either prove right or wrong detractors or skeptics.

I've mentioned the H word only because some could see it that was as Slott has literally written comics mocking the trend that he himself is flirting with going down. On the optimistic side, he could be "playing the system", knowing what works and what will get fanboys a-talkin'.

I mean, had it been The Ghost all along, it wouldn't have inspired this much discussion, most likely. Slott likes showing the downsides of the Initiative, and this is it. Even Slapstick was pushed to the brink. The walking Looney Tune!
 
He's the Pvt.Pyle


Now heres how I see it Slott is playing with us, he knows the dangers of creating another Penance, but the difference between a Slott and a Jenkins is the Slott knows these character in and out back and forth.

Look the guy repowered She-Hulk without breaking a sweat, gave hope to Squirrel Girl in reference to Speedball, called out the asshat writing of guys like Jenkins and Bendis oh so non-subtly within the comics themselves, seemlessly intergrated WWH in A:TI in such a way that it added more layers to Hardball and it played into the Ironman vs Hulk brawl...etc..ALL in continuity and within the plausibility of the Marvel U!

This guy is Marvel comics, Slapstick is gonna be alright its almost impossible for Dan not to pull this off.
 
If I remember correctly it was Jenkins that said that (Marvel said) there was room for only one happy go lucky character in Marvel and that's Spider-Man. Yes, Spider-Man.:whatever: Anyway, I really don't know much about Slapstick as a character; mainly that he was one of what could have been a 90's boy band of alterna-body heroes. I also don't remember him being in the actual NW comics. He was an honorary member like Ultra Girl. That's the sore point with me, if you're going to make him violent to the extreme then make it for something reasonable instead of ragging on the NW. I see an out for him not being the culprit...for all we know he said "You had to be there" because he was imagining it and no amount of explanation can carry that across.

In regards to "the added depths and dimensions" this gives the character...it's getting to be a one note thing. Is that all we truly see as growth? Acting negatively out of character? Bah. We already saw Cloud-9 do the same, almost kill a guy. So, to me it's more like a sample of what training these people like soldiers leads to instead of training them to be heroes. Or is that something that can be trained? Slapstick's outburst is just a another step in the stair that The Initiative is building toward a clear example of the consequences Cap feared. Or, at least I hope that is where this is leading.
 
That's the point I think Dan is getting at that the Initiative is training these kids to be killers.

So I'm with Slott in what he's trying to get across.
 
He's the Pvt.Pyle


Now heres how I see it Slott is playing with us, he knows the dangers of creating another Penance, but the difference between a Slott and a Jenkins is the Slott knows these character in and out back and forth.

Look the guy repowered She-Hulk without breaking a sweat, gave hope to Squirrel Girl in reference to Speedball, called out the asshat writing of guys like Jenkins and Bendis oh so non-subtly within the comics themselves, seemlessly intergrated WWH in A:TI in such a way that it added more layers to Hardball and it played into the Ironman vs Hulk brawl...etc..ALL in continuity and within the plausibility of the Marvel U!

This guy is Marvel comics, Slapstick is gonna be alright its almost impossible for Dan not to pull this off.

Wow, you seem to have more faith in Slott than even I do, and that is a considerable feat. ;) But, I generally agree with this, although I wouldn't say it was "almost impossible" for Slott not to err. Even the best writers sometimes muck up. Still, the finale certainly got me to pay more attention to Slapstick and hopefully he doesn't drop the ball.

If I remember correctly it was Jenkins that said that (Marvel said) there was room for only one happy go lucky character in Marvel and that's Spider-Man. Yes, Spider-Man.:whatever: Anyway, I really don't know much about Slapstick as a character; mainly that he was one of what could have been a 90's boy band of alterna-body heroes. I also don't remember him being in the actual NW comics. He was an honorary member like Ultra Girl. That's the sore point with me, if you're going to make him violent to the extreme then make it for something reasonable instead of ragging on the NW. I see an out for him not being the culprit...for all we know he said "You had to be there" because he was imagining it and no amount of explanation can carry that across.

In regards to "the added depths and dimensions" this gives the character...it's getting to be a one note thing. Is that all we truly see as growth? Acting negatively out of character? Bah. We already saw Cloud-9 do the same, almost kill a guy. So, to me it's more like a sample of what training these people like soldiers leads to instead of training them to be heroes. Or is that something that can be trained? Slapstick's outburst is just a another step in the stair that The Initiative is building toward a clear example of the consequences Cap feared. Or, at least I hope that is where this is leading.

Cloud 9 is a newer character, so technically what is and what isn't "out of character" for her isn't completely known. Obviously she has shown some fear of what she is becoming in the program and Trauma wanted to help her through it. She doesn't like doing some of those things and wants to work to avoid it.

By "added depth", maybe I should clarify. Usually it seems to be that characters defined as "funny comic reliefs" often aren't allowed to get angry in stories because it is out-of-character. Most times they're just in there with the funny, regardless of how high the stakes are or who the enemy is. And sometimes even in the best hands, that can get old. Anyone can be pushed too far. Changeling, the "funny one" of the Teen Titans, once busted Deathstroke out of prison and all but wanted to murder him in cold blood over what happened during the Judas Covenant affair. Some could call that out of character, although I'd easily agree that Gauntlet is no Deathstroke. But you had a character who normally did nothing but be funny, suddenly displaying a willingness to kill when pushed too far, which made it even scarier. It was actually interesting.

Slapstick teamed up with the New Warriors in a MARVEL COMICS PRESENTS story after his own series ended, and it was presumed that made him a de-facto member, or at least some sort of reserve member like anyone who teams up with the Avengers seems to be.

I added the bold part because that nailed the core dilemma within A:TI. The program trains metahumans to be soldiers, not heroes, and sometimes the two aren't the same. Technically, Gyrich should know; he spent years allied with the Avengers and saw them fight no end of threats without resorting to "ends justify the means" murder, even of underlings. But, I guess Stamford made everyone a hard ass. Even the fact that the camp is named after an andriod hero gives off a stern impression; "heroes can be made". Which is how Gyrich seems the cadets, as robots, or "big guns" to be controlled like puppets and the moment they express some sort of free will or hesitation, they're treated worse than any super villain (who is immediately entrusted with a badge if they make any token effort to "work as an agent", although this has been true for at least 20 years). Plus, the majority of those with real power in the program themselves have no powers and thus really can't relate. Gauntlet is a cyborg who could remove his arm at any time. War Machine is a guy in armor who a few months ago was leading SENTINALS. Gyrich is an agent. Even Yellowjacket to some degree spent 2/3rd's of his existence needing to take his "Pym Particles" to gain power and only in the late 90's was it revealed that his body absorbed enough of 'em to produce the effect naturally. Justice relates the best as a mutant and he has little sway in the general program, and even Yellowjacket has limitations.

Part of what makes the book so riveting to me is this internal turmoil, between those who see superheroes as soldiers and those who don't. Slott could have very easily made this a superhero paradise where everything is hunky-dorey and any negative sides to these ideas or CW were cast aside, like in MIGHTY AVENGERS where someone like Ms. Marvel who happily exploited Cap's death to entrap Spider-Woman and the rest of her allies is treated as heroine to root for. Instead Slott has chosen this approach and I am sure it is very deliberate. Perhaps what happened to Gauntlet leads to some sort of discussion or change or shift in the program, or the hints of it. And that was part of why slamming the NW's was even more insulting; the Initiative has been far more reckless and bloodthirsty than they ever were, and all the people involved are paid very well for it; how ARE they any better? Because the fed says so?

That's the point I think Dan is getting at that the Initiative is training these kids to be killers.

So I'm with Slott in what he's trying to get across.

Exactly.
 
Maybe it would've been more palatable if Slott had made Slapstick a major character before this. I understand what you're saying about Beast Boy/Changeling, and it is to some extent true. But Gar had been a star of The New Teen Titans since the new team's debut, and he'd had a chance to develop as a whole character before that business with Deathstroke. With Slapstick, he was a joke character in a joke book, then he disappeared for years, and now that he's back, his first significant act is the near-murder of an man who's only guilty of being an insensitive jerk. Frankly, I would've gladly preferred Slapstick to remain an undeveloped background character who exists only to crack a joke every now and then; in an ensemble book like ATI that sort of character would work quite well, after all.

But we're just arguing the same points in circles here. In itself, taken in a vacuum, I just don't like the image of Slapstick viciously beating someone almost to death. Taken in the larger context of Slapstick's potentially becoming fleshed out as one of ATI's more central characters rather than just the bit player he's been so far, I can swallow it. I'm content to sit back and see what Slott does before making any further comments on the subject.
 
Maybe it would've been more palatable if Slott had made Slapstick a major character before this. I understand what you're saying about Beast Boy/Changeling, and it is to some extent true. But Gar had been a star of The New Teen Titans since the new team's debut, and he'd had a chance to develop as a whole character before that business with Deathstroke. With Slapstick, he was a joke character in a joke book, then he disappeared for years, and now that he's back, his first significant act is the near-murder of an man who's only guilty of being an insensitive jerk. Frankly, I would've gladly preferred Slapstick to remain an undeveloped background character who exists only to crack a joke every now and then; in an ensemble book like ATI that sort of character would work quite well, after all.

But we're just arguing the same points in circles here. In itself, taken in a vacuum, I just don't like the image of Slapstick viciously beating someone almost to death. Taken in the larger context of Slapstick's potentially becoming fleshed out as one of ATI's more central characters rather than just the bit player he's been so far, I can swallow it. I'm content to sit back and see what Slott does before making any further comments on the subject.


I've gotta disagree here, I've been wondering why Slott put Slapstick in this mix for a long time. He's a joke character sure, but he's an incredibably powerful joke character that's main limit is his imagination. He's been background noise and he's felt awkward in this series until now, and I've always thought why was he included at all? Slapstick has always been a bit psychotic right from the start. He's mainly the practical joke type but looking back at the earlier issues whenever Guantlet was making fun of the NW's look at Slapstick's face. This has been planned for a while and I don't think it's the same as taking a lighthearted character and turning him dark, it's taking an completely undeveloped character and fleshing out his motivations.

Personally I was thrilled to see guantlet get the beatdown he so severely deserved, and even happier to see it was Slapstick with the balls to do it.
 
It certainly came across as legitimately frightening, I'll give it that.
 
Maybe it would've been more palatable if Slott had made Slapstick a major character before this. I understand what you're saying about Beast Boy/Changeling, and it is to some extent true. But Gar had been a star of The New Teen Titans since the new team's debut, and he'd had a chance to develop as a whole character before that business with Deathstroke. With Slapstick, he was a joke character in a joke book, then he disappeared for years, and now that he's back, his first significant act is the near-murder of an man who's only guilty of being an insensitive jerk. Frankly, I would've gladly preferred Slapstick to remain an undeveloped background character who exists only to crack a joke every now and then; in an ensemble book like ATI that sort of character would work quite well, after all.

I do agree with this point to some extent; this was easily the biggest thing to happen with Slapstick on the book so far and it was controversial (at best). Shame he couldn't have laid some smack down on an actual villain or one of the Warbond before this.

But we're just arguing the same points in circles here. In itself, taken in a vacuum, I just don't like the image of Slapstick viciously beating someone almost to death. Taken in the larger context of Slapstick's potentially becoming fleshed out as one of ATI's more central characters rather than just the bit player he's been so far, I can swallow it. I'm content to sit back and see what Slott does before making any further comments on the subject.

Fair enough.

I actually thought it was interesting, but then again, I haven't really cared for Gauntlet much. I don't see an "out" for Slapstick over this, so hopefully Slott can work with it effectively.

I've gotta disagree here, I've been wondering why Slott put Slapstick in this mix for a long time. He's a joke character sure, but he's an incredibably powerful joke character that's main limit is his imagination. He's been background noise and he's felt awkward in this series until now, and I've always thought why was he included at all? Slapstick has always been a bit psychotic right from the start. He's mainly the practical joke type but looking back at the earlier issues whenever Guantlet was making fun of the NW's look at Slapstick's face. This has been planned for a while and I don't think it's the same as taking a lighthearted character and turning him dark, it's taking an completely undeveloped character and fleshing out his motivations.

Personally I was thrilled to see guantlet get the beatdown he so severely deserved, and even happier to see it was Slapstick with the balls to do it.

I definitely lean more on this opinion. Yeah, it was dark and grim and whatnot, but it thrilled me at the end.

It certainly came across as legitimately frightening, I'll give it that.

I agree.
 
We'll see where this is going, hopefully. If there's something I detest is the whole violence over words thing. I never see it as an excuse to resort to physical violence, just use words back. Snapping because of abusive training? Great. For putting the NW down? Brainfart. All of this has me really curious, I'll have to ask a childhood buddy of mine that collected Slapstick while I collected Darkhawk.
 
We'll see where this is going, hopefully. If there's something I detest is the whole violence over words thing. I never see it as an excuse to resort to physical violence, just use words back. Snapping because of abusive training? Great. For putting the NW down? Brainfart. All of this has me really curious, I'll have to ask a childhood buddy of mine that collected Slapstick while I collected Darkhawk.

It's not quite the same. If I had a group of friends which literally saved the whole freaking world and now some @ss was calling them babykillers and aliking all screw ups to that same group of people (your friends, the one's the whole world owes their lives to) and does this to my face words just aren't as poetic as broken teeth. Plus if you talk back to the instructors they go Dr. Satan on you and disect you remove your powers and kick you out. Better to just beat someone to death and be done with it.
 
Yeah, well, if Slapstick talked back and Gauntlet raised the bar to physical abuse, Slapstick would've been totally justified. I agree with Trop, though: you don't have a right to beat someone almost to death because he bad-mouthed your friends. I thought it was thuggish and ******ed when Gauntlet threatened Gyrich with physical violence for implying that all soldiers aren't heroes. Slapstick's deal was the same as that but magnified a thousandfold.

Also, I don't see how including Slapstick in ATI but not focusing on him renders him "awkward." Are Thor Girl, Triathlon, Stature, and all of the other recognizable heroes shown at Camp Hammond in various issues awkward simply because they're "background noise," too? They're kind of necessary to sell Camp Hammond as the new hub of the Initiative's superhero army.
 
Yeah, well, if Slapstick talked back and Gauntlet raised the bar to physical abuse, Slapstick would've been totally justified. I agree with Trop, though: you don't have a right to beat someone almost to death because he bad-mouthed your friends. I thought it was thuggish and ******ed when Gauntlet threatened Gyrich with physical violence for implying that all soldiers aren't heroes. Slapstick's deal was the same as that but magnified a thousandfold.

Also, I don't see how including Slapstick in ATI but not focusing on him renders him "awkward." Are Thor Girl, Triathlon, Stature, and all of the other recognizable heroes shown at Camp Hammond in various issues awkward simply because they're "background noise," too? They're kind of necessary to sell Camp Hammond as the new hub of the Initiative's superhero army.

You may have noticed nothing in the constitution applies there, they have evil nazi's disecting corpses and trainees getting killed without revealing jack to the families.

I was commenting on how Slapstick being who he is, is awkard in the Iniative because of his personality and odd power set. All the others make sense as cadets, Slapstick is more a reality warper/oddball and you wouldn't think his power set or personality would make him desirable as one of the initial cadets. Many of them are background noise but none of the others seem nearly as out of place.

I understand why the characters are necessary, and the point of the camp. Just out of all the characters selected he seemed the strangest choice by Slott to me until this issue.
 
Eh, he's a superpowered individual, so if he wants to keep using his powers, the Initiative is pretty much the only place he could be. I find it a little more awkward for Hulkling and Wiccan to be there, myself, given that they actively opposed the SHRA during the Civil War.

I don't get what you mean about the constitution, though. Are you saying that Slapstick is somehow justified for acting totally unheroic because his superiors at Camp Hammond aren't acting particularly heroic?
 
It's not quite the same. If I had a group of friends which literally saved the whole freaking world and now some @ss was calling them babykillers and aliking all screw ups to that same group of people (your friends, the one's the whole world owes their lives to) and does this to my face words just aren't as poetic as broken teeth. Plus if you talk back to the instructors they go Dr. Satan on you and disect you remove your powers and kick you out. Better to just beat someone to death and be done with it.

He's a living cartoon! Do you know how many witty things he could have done to Gauntlet without it going to violence? He could have kissed him Looney Tunes style and then say "Dude got into it, he gave me some tongue! :o" or something like that. Shutting you up by beating you up just gives more validity to whatever the person you beat up is saying. Were his words so true that you had to shut him up with fists? I don't think we'll agree on this.:D
 
I find it a little more awkward for Hulkling and Wiccan to be there, myself, given that they actively opposed the SHRA during the Civil War.
Oh, you totally missed this, huh
emot-xd.gif
.
 
I saw it. I don't take it as canon, though. It's clearly meant to be tongue-in-cheek.
 
Eh, he's a superpowered individual, so if he wants to keep using his powers, the Initiative is pretty much the only place he could be. I find it a little more awkward for Hulkling and Wiccan to be there, myself, given that they actively opposed the SHRA during the Civil War.

I don't get what you mean about the constitution, though. Are you saying that Slapstick is somehow justified for acting totally unheroic because his superiors at Camp Hammond aren't acting particularly heroic?

What I mean by the constitution is that normal rules and laws don't even vaguely apply here. The Sec and Pym seem to run this show however they see fit. They don't even want Stark clued into what they're into. Between MVP, the treatment of Trauma and the general usage of cadets they're clearly not following any protocol except do what we say.

Yes I'm saying Slapstick is justified. You can't fight these guys on any level because they decide the rules of the game. You can't complain, you can't object and you can't leave unless you get their say so. It's not that they aren't acting heroic, they're the villians of the story. They're using the kids as bullets and forgetting they're people. I smiled when I saw him beating the piss out of the guy and I hope they make him director of Shield for it.
 
He's a living cartoon! Do you know how many witty things he could have done to Gauntlet without it going to violence? He could have kissed him Looney Tunes style and then say "Dude got into it, he gave me some tongue! :o" or something like that. Shutting you up by beating you up just gives more validity to whatever the person you beat up is saying. Were his words so true that you had to shut him up with fists? I don't think we'll agree on this.:D

All Guantlet did was threaten violence. He wasn't outwitting people, he was bullying them. If Slapstick did anything else he would be in the negative zone in that fun little prison. He responded the same way he was treated. I know we're not gonna agree here, and that's fine I just don't see any other option if you gave a @hit about your friends and or just gave a @hit about the safety of yourself and your friends or if you just didn't like evil nazi's experimenting on your former teammates.
 
It's hard to gauge on the interwebs, but I'm pretty sure you're being sarcastic. Am I right? :)
 
It's hard to gauge on the interwebs, but I'm pretty sure you're being sarcastic. Am I right? :)

It's sad but I really can't tell anymore myself. Possibly both?

What can I say I just love the idea of a psychotic cartoon beating arogant @hitheads to death with wacky props. I think deep down in most people's hearts is the same desire.
 
To each his own. I still thought of Slapstick as a fairly heroic individual, and I can't find anything heroic about nearly killing someone because he bruised your feelings. We can agree to disagree, and you can at least take solace in the fact that your view seems to be the prevailing one with both creators and fans.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,263
Messages
22,074,598
Members
45,875
Latest member
kedenlewis
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"