Bunker
Avenger
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2008
- Messages
- 18,011
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Does anyone know if the new trailer is in front of Where the Wild Things Are?
Nope. I went last night hoping to see it in IMAX.

Does anyone know if the new trailer is in front of Where the Wild Things Are?
The value of unobtanium drastically outweighs the cost of sending a ship out to fetch it. It's like the diamond business. The people over here are making craploads of money while barely lifting a finger, but what about the people overseas who are slaving away every day to find the diamonds?
The CEOs sending the ships to Pandora probably live a life of luxury. One shipment of unobtanium funds their lives probably a trillion times over. So what's the cost of one shipride to them?
Yes, I am. I'm sure in 150 years, nothing about our conquering nature will change, so the themes are still relevant.
Unobtainium is a facetious term for any extremely rare, costly, or physically impossible material needed to fulfill a given design for a given application. The name is a portmanteau derived from unobtainable + -ium (the suffix for a number of chemical elements). Variations include unobtanium and unattainium, with the same meaning.
The properties of any particular "unobtainium" depend on the intended use. For example, a pulley made of unobtainium might be massless and frictionless. However, if used in a nuclear rocket, unobtainium would be light, strong at high temperatures, and resistant to radiation damage.
The name unobtainium also closely resembles the systematic element name for undiscovered elements that have an atomic number of 100-199. Like unobtainium, these all have 5 syllable names beginning with "un" and ending in "ium". The term was, however, in use long before the IUPAC systematic names.
Another largely synonymous term includes wishalloy,[1] although the sense is often subtly different in that a wishalloy usually doesn't exist at all, whereas unobtainium may merely be unavailable. The term handwavium usually is used to indicate a material that probably cannot even in principle be real.
Maybe Cameron just said "Da hell with making sense of the story
Maybe Cameron just said "Da hell with making sense of the story" and just decided to go for a massive CGI fest. I am good either way. Here's a wiki on "unobtanium":
how so?? it's taking plot points typically seen in romantic films and throwing a sci-fi wrapper around it....the story is adequate....seems very Dances With Wolves in a lot of ways
how so?? it's taking plot points typically seen in romantic films and throwing a sci-fi wrapper around it....the story is adequate....seems very Dances With Wolves in a lot of ways
And that's a bad thing?
So having the same plot elements as other films automatically makes Avatar bad?
Terminator 1 and 2 took the last savior of earth concept and look what we got. Cameron adds his own little twists to "cliches" and the results have been fantastic
Not bad...but calling it brilliant is a bit much....it will be an average story with amazing visuals...
and the sheep will flock to it
Anyone else having serious delays with their browser while surfing the hype these days or is it just me? Figured its not with that ten minute delay between DV two repeat posts. It's literally taking me 30 seconds to switch pages, which is weird because its not that busy this time of year.
I'm a bit past giving any director "benefit of the doubt" these days....it's practically a dirty term in my vocabulary
Okay yeah....you will see this movie anyway and probably opening weekend.I'm a bit past giving any director "benefit of the doubt" these days....it's practically a dirty term in my vocabulary
And I agree with BL, most people will care less about the story and see this just for the visuals. But I don't have a problem with that.