TNC9852002
Banned User
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2002
- Messages
- 30,717
- Reaction score
- 4
- Points
- 31
Nolan: "No" until proven rich at the box office.. 
-TNC

-TNC
Stop lying^ Didnt you hear Nolan said no to a third bat-film, Im sorry to break the news. lol
good things take timethe new suit is slowly but surely growing on me
![]()
Yeah, but they arent superheroes either. That awkward belt needs to go from the comics. Nolan's belt works and looks a lot better. But even if you want pouches, you can always design them like in BTAS or something. Anything more modern, less awkward, less clunky and less buttcrack would suffice. But yeah, i forgot. I am talking to a dude whose taste is Batman with a robin cape. My bad.Hurm. I wasn't aware that cops, soldiers, and SWAT members are, in fact, Bob The Builder.
Hahahahahaha! Epic!Its good to see you guys together.
So? It's fine for cops and soldiers, but makes Batman look like Bob the Builder?Yeah, but they arent superheroes either.
Explain how it is more awkward than the Begins/TDK belt. As I already explained, the size of the compartments is going to be dictated by the size of the gear he is carrying. This means the compartments will be just as big and awkward or just as small and unobtrusive regardless of which belt he's wearing, and regardless of whether the pouches are metal or fabric. If anything, the the police-style belt will be less awkward, by virtue of the waist strap not being metal.That awkward belt needs to go from the comics.
Yes, very clever. I am vanquished!But yeah, i forgot. I am talking to a dude whose taste is Batman with a robin cape. My bad.
My posts are precisely as long and involved as they need to be to properly communicate my ideas. As I always say, being bothered by my writing is really your problem, not mine.See? Its not just me that gets annoyed by the unnecessarily convoluted posts,
. I am talking to a dude whose taste is Batman with a robin cape.
I just don't see how Nolan can enter in to a franchise like this without anticipating sequels. Same goes for Eckhart, and his "I can't gaurentee I'll return" comment. Especially with Eckhart, who is basically setting himself up to be the main villain of the sequel.Nolan: "No" until proven rich at the box office..
-TNC
My posts are precisely as long and involved as they need to be to properly communicate my ideas. As I always say, being bothered by my writing is really your problem, not mine.
Moreover, I never said it was just you. I know there are plenty of people who don't like my posting style. Fortunately, I am really not concerned that some members get their panties in a bunch over my writing.
If it's any consolation, I enjoy Saint putting dumb people in their place.
Saint don't deny that you really enjoy writing long posts with tons of vocabulary sprinkled in for effect.
In terms of language, I have no more education than any other person my age. If I'm willing to admit that, I'm probably not especially interested in sounding more educated than anyone, don't you think? Such an admission would be detrimental to that goal.I know you do. You clearly get off to sounding educated
Only half true. I certainly make a point of correcting people, but not as a means of putting them down or "in their place," except when what they say is meant to make me or someone else look foolish without warrant.and putting dumb people in their place.
Surely you didn't think this a possibility. If you don't want a reply, you shouldn't say anything to me.Don't feel the need to respond with a paragraph
Explain how they are more "vocabulary ridden" than they need to be. How "vocabulary ridden" should a post be? Also, what exactly is "vocabulary ridden?" How is one post more "vocabulary ridden" than another, when every single word ever committed to type is a part of one's vocabulary? How does using words that are comfortable to me make my post more "vocabulary ridden" than the individual who uses different words that are comfortable to him?I think he is a bit dishonest when he says his posts are exactly as long and as vocabulary ridden as they need to be.
I am always confused when people describe my writing as requiring effort. Does writing the way you write take special effort? Why would the opposite be true of me?Clearly he puts extra effort in when it comes to putting idiots in their place as the case may be.
Some do not write the way you do so they assume you take an "extra" effort in writing. In reality its just your writing style, and every writing style variesI am always confused when people describe my writing as requiring effort. Does writing the way you write take special effort? Why would the opposite be true of me?
What I enjoy is writing. I'm a writer. That pretty much makes the enjoyment of writing a pre-requisite. This doesn't change anything I said; it is still true that I write in the manner that is most comfortable for me, and to communicate my ideas as completely and clearly as I can.
As for using words for "effect," well, every word is used for effect, by everyone. That's how words work.
In terms of language, I have no more education than any other person my age. If I'm willing to admit that, I'm probably not especially interested in sounding more educated than anyone, don't you think? Such an admission would be detrimental to that goal.
Only half true. I certainly make a point of correcting people, but not as a means of putting them down or "in their place," except when what they say is meant to make me or someone else look foolish without warrant.
For example, you will notice that while I'm correcting you, I'm not "putting you in your place."
Surely you didn't think this a possibility. If you don't want a reply, you shouldn't say anything to me.
Explain how they are more "vocabulary ridden" than they need to be. How "vocabulary ridden" should a post be? Also, what exactly is "vocabulary ridden?" How is one post more "vocabulary ridden" than another, when every single word ever committed to type is a part of one's vocabulary? How does using words that are comfortable to me make my post more "vocabulary ridden" than the individual who uses different words that are comfortable to him?
I am always confused when people describe my writing as requiring effort. Does writing the way you write take special effort? Why would the opposite be true of me?
People need to let it go.
I don't see what the problem is...are some of you that illiterate that it hurts you to read Saint's or even Regwec's posts??
There really are only a small handfull of posters in the Batman boards, if not 3-4(maybe 5)that type like Saint or Regwec(for examplest
.
After reading through posts that are either nonsense or just repeats of something you've heard too many times to want to remember, it's actually a nice change to read some well thought out posts...and with points to them as well.
Not saying the rest of the posters don't have good posts...a lot of you do, I just don't see why people need to hate on others who don't like to use slang and like to use proper/correct English.
He might as well just be Nightwing, if he's going to be that old.