Saint
Avenger
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2003
- Messages
- 13,591
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 56
Neat! Elements of those would make for a cool batsuit.
Why should we have to physically produce better ourselves just to prove something can be done? It's been done better (in Daredevil), and anyone can tell just by looking that it could be done better.
But for something fan-made (and not by me) - not the perfect eye shape, but still, not so bug-eyed:
![]()
Imagine this full cowl with those same lenses, with a slightly tweaked, more angular shape:
![]()
![]()
I know that this is a direct adaptation of the current comics cowl, but it reminds me of NightOwl for some reason. I dont like it. I think its the eyes.Why should we have to physically produce better ourselves just to prove something can be done? It's been done better (in Daredevil), and anyone can tell just by looking that it could be done better.
But for something fan-made (and not by me) - not the perfect eye shape, but still, not so bug-eyed:
![]()
Imagine this full cowl with those same lenses, with a slightly tweaked, more angular shape:
![]()
![]()
And for the arguments about white and black color lenses - how would that help in not blocking peripheral vision?
Are we really concerned about his peripheral vision? I don't know how long he'll be wearing these lenses, but it certainly seems like it won't be for very long at all. As far as I'm concerned, Bale can have limited vision for a scene or two if it means better looking lenses.
Eh? What wouldn't what?No, actually it wouldn't.
The chances of the lenses being worn in any situation where they would inhibit him (narrow peripheral vision or not) are nill.Limited peripheral vision in what ever scene would limit Bales visual range , interacting with other actors.
And, to be perfectly frank, actors work with these sort of inhibitions all the time.
You want the actor to be as comfortable as possible.
While it's interesting and amusing that the lenses will finally make an appearance in the film, I'm so glad we don't have to watch that for the entire movie. I just think white/mirrored lenses don't work on a live-action cowl. In the comics, they're fine, because they can be drawn however the artists wants them to look. In real life, they look awkward and weird, like an alien.
Plus, in the comics, they have the ability to allow the cowl to move. The eyebrows can raise show surprise, or creases and furrows can appear to display anger. In movies, they don't have that luxury. There's only so much an actor can emote with his mouth.
This looks absolutely amazing. The jaw, shape of the eyes and nose is spot on! If only the ears were a bit larger.
This looks absolutely amazing. The jaw, shape of the eyes and nose is spot on! If only the ears were a bit larger.
Daredevil is blind so he has to wear lenses or his eyes will betray him.They'd look fine if designed as Daredevil's, which didn't look weird or alien at all. Of course, I have no interest in lenses for an entire film. They have to be retractable, sliding into place when they have a purpose to serve (and their functions would be numerous).
Yes! That's exactly what i was talking about. Did you get those of the DD DVD? I only have the director's cut version of the movie.
Eh? What wouldn't what?
The chances of the lenses being worn in any situation where they would inhibit him (narrow peripheral vision or not) are nill.
The circumstance under which it would be relevant are as such:
1) Someone is standing in Batman's peripheral vision.
2) That person's performance includes particulars that are relevant to Bale, such as emotions that Bale is expected to play off.
3) Bale cannot look right at the person, for some reason.
I imagine the only sort of scene which meets these criteria is a scene in which Bale wouldn't be wearing the lenses, anyway. These obviously have a very particular purpose and will be worn only to that end, and it seems to me that in such a scene, the criteria above probably won't apply.
And, to be perfectly frank, actors work with these sort of inhibitions all the time.
Then why don't the costume designers just slip Bale into a pair of grey pajamas and a robinesque eye mask:heart:
So it looks good. You don't need to be a fanboy to say "That looks kinda weird."Your ideas are highly doubtful since the whole design of the suit was intended to increase Bales over all comfort and ability to see and move within the parameters of what was set up design wise for these films. Look at the eye socket design of the mask, it's meant to be unencumbered. Therefore, why alter a working design to satisfy the needs of a very minor part of the films fanbase.
What does that have to do with anything? I'm not making any argument on whether or not there should or should not be lenses. I don't have strong feelings either way. But, since he has them, I would prefer they not look weird.Since most of the people who will watch this movie A)Only know batman from the previous movies. B) Don't read the comics so don't know the "Traditional" Batman look. C) Could care less if he has white lenses at some point.
the lens everyone!!!!
in the new tv spot #15
0:22
![]()
They just look too wide. I think its just the angle were seeing him atThe lenses look the same as BTAS, I don't see why some people are saying their too big. I think their prefect .
![]()
Hey, Bale's no Tina Turner, but give 'em a break will ya?

the lens everyone!!!!
in the new tv spot #15
0:22
![]()
Personally, I wish they just used white contact lenses.