Cmill216
Senior Case Officer
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2005
- Messages
- 23,491
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
I don't like Milo for Chris. A fine actor, but a Chris he is not.
Whoa, whoa, whoa......
Did Matt call Milo a fine actor?
I don't like Milo for Chris. A fine actor, but a Chris he is not.
This entire rant is irrelevant when I plainly stated that some of your choices exhibited uninspired casting. Some. Not all.I really can't stand when people say that. Familiarity with the actors work is what my cast list is made up of, not Google Image search. Of course resemblence is a factor BUT previous roles the actors have had (that I have personally seen) that share a lot of similar traits with the character is what I made my final decisions on.
Like Richard Burgi. Been a fan of his since his show The Sentinel. I enjoyed his run on 24 and he is pretty much the only good thing about the extremely bad Starship Troopers sequel.
I'd seen Owain Yeoman and Alexander Skarsgård in films and tv before but when I saw them in HBO's Generation Kill they blew me away and changed my old choices to them.
So you want to continue the blandness by casting accordingly? Is that not working against yourself? You make the character interesting, improve on them, and cast well. Saying "oh, well so and so is bad, so a bad casting choice is justified", won't suffice.Ashley is a run of the mill young female character added to RE4 just to give Leon something to do in the game. What actress should have been picked for what is arguably one of the series most bland and "uninspired" characters?
Ok. So you're settling. Should have just said that from the beginning. Prefacing with a comment that undermines the genre is the type of thinking that prevents certain genres from getting any sort of recognition and respect, because the people behind them are already selling themselves short. Worse, they're fine with it and have no problem continuing the trend.Walker is ok and Hauser is really good and both are far from terrible in my opinion. And considering we are talking about casting a genre movie based on a game with zombies, that was inspired by B movies with zombies, and one character is from an easily forgettable side game and the other has little to no screen time I don't exactly see why I would be trying to find people you consider "good" to play those parts when I already think the people I've picked would do just fine.
This entire rant is irrelevant when I plainly stated that some of your choices exhibited uninspired casting. Some. Not all.
So you want to continue the blandness by casting accordingly? Is that not working against yourself? You make the character interesting, improve on them, and cast well. Saying "oh, well so and so is bad, so a bad casting choice is justified", won't suffice.
Ok. So you're settling. Should have just said that from the beginning. Prefacing with a comment that undermines the genre is the type of thinking that prevents certain genres from getting any sort of recognition and respect, because the people behind them are already selling themselves short. Worse, they're fine with it and have no problem continuing the trend.
Prefacing my statement with "it looks like..." makes it an observation. Not a statement of fact. So no, there was no farce in what I wrote. Instead of being so damn defensive, all you had to say was "no, I don't cast solely on looks". And we could have all moved on.Your original comment was irrelevent because it held no truth. NONE of my cast is based on just resemblence.
Take your pick from half of young-Hollywood. The requirements aren't vast for this role. Last I checked, Ashley was a young woman in college, not a girl that's barely out of high school.If Hayden played Ashley like she played Claire Bennett in Heroes (minus the powers) then you'd have a damn good Ashley.
Since you think Hayden is such a bad actress and terrible choice to play a character that falls right into her obviously range then why don't you enlighten us and tell us who would be perfect for the role.
Walker's track record is precisely why he'd be horrid for any role. You are possibly the only male here that thinks Paul Walker is actually a good actor. And if it's a bit part, then it'd be pointless to cast him anyway. Good or bad, he's not an actor that plays very small roles. He's almost always first or second-leading man.No, I'm not settling and when did casting character actors for bit parts become a bad trend? I think given Walkers track record with films like the Fast and the Furious series and Running Scared he would be a very good canidate to play Dead Aim's Bruce McGivern.
When it comes to Richard, I don't really care too much who they cast really. He was a throwaway character. Only reason I'm bringing up Cole is because I think he's so bland, and he is nothing like Richard. Cole's a hard-ass through and through.Cole Hauser (who I've been a fan of since Dazed and Confused) has had multiple roles that make him very suitable for the role of STARS member Richard in my opinion. Tears of the Sun, Harts War, Tigerland (a movie that made me pick Colin Farrell for Chris as well) are all good films and Hauser cares himself well in them.
His characters are secondary and that is exactly what his role would be in a RE film. I don't need an Oscar Winning actor to fill the role of a character that is zombie bait when I have a perfectly fine actor that could do just as good a job.
How about you start dropping some names since you seem to think of yourself as a casting expert so we can get an idea of how your award winning cast would look.
Who would you say is a miss cause personally (for obvious reasons) I think my cast is pretty much spot on.
Some characters would be played by people a little older than their game counterpart but that is only because I feel it makes the character more realistic to be in their mid 20s or early 30s than in their late teens or early 20s.
Prefacing my statement with "it looks like..." makes it an observation. Not a statement of fact. So no, there was no farce in what I wrote. Instead of being so damn defensive, all you had to say was "no, I don't cast solely on looks". And we could have all moved on.
Take your pick from half of young-Hollywood. The requirements aren't vast for this role. Last I checked, Ashley was a young woman in college, not a girl that's barely out of high school.
Walker's track record is precisely why he'd be horrid for any role. You are possibly the only male here that thinks Paul Walker is actually a good actor. And if it's a bit part, then it'd be pointless to cast him anyway. Good or bad, he's not an actor that plays very small roles. He's almost always first or second-leading man.
When it comes to Richard, I don't really care too much who they cast really. He was a throwaway character. Only reason I'm bringing up Cole is because I think he's so bland, and he is nothing like Richard. Cole's a hard-ass through and through.
I also love your assumption of award-winning cast, when I made no indication of such. Just because I detest crappy actors, doesn't mean I'm supporting the polar opposite of casting anyone that's been given the nod for an Oscar.
If you must know, I think 3/5 of your casting choices were dead-on and fall in line with what I had in mind, but I am sure your thick-headedness will find some way to ignore this.
I'm with Majik, a lot is hit and miss. Richard Burgi as Barry is brilliant as is Sean Bean for Hunk. Then others...like Brandon Routh for Chris or Chris Evans for Leon...not so much.
Sorry but that is your opinion and I don't agree with it in the slightest. I'm merely defending my picks, replying to what Crook has to say to me, and telling him that it's easier to try and pick something apart than to actually do something constructive.
If I was insulting him or posting in all caps or bold to signify that I was yelling I could see how you might come to your conclusion but I'm not so I'm not exactly sure where you're coming from.
You need to look back at how you've responded to people that merely criticized some of your casting choices. Matt's right, you really are taking this too personally. I had an entire post ready with my own suggestions, but as it was gaining in length, I realized it was ultimately pointless when it's clear you've had a set way of approaching others.
I've got no issue constructively going back and forth with someone over casting, I've done it for years here. But I've been here long enough to know that arguing with someone that won't stop defending their own position and addressing other people's ideas would be a waste of time.
Probably because you have a completely aggressive and defensive tone over the casting of video game characters. Waaay too personally.
I'd like to see themYou need to look back at how you've responded to people that merely criticized some of your casting choices. Matt's right, you really are taking this too personally. I had an entire post ready with my own suggestions, but as it was gaining in length, I realized it was ultimately pointless when it's clear you've had a set way of approaching others.
I've got no issue constructively going back and forth with someone over casting, I've done it for years here. But I've been here long enough to know that arguing with someone that won't stop defending their own position and addressing other people's ideas would be a waste of time.