Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]504159[/split]
Screen goes black/
Chris Nolan walks to the screen (in imax), takes a drink of tea and says;
"I made The Dark Knight, see you in 2017."
teaser ends/
Negative. Either with Jason Bourne or Suicide Squad.Out of the loop..but did we get a trailer at the comic con?
Negative. Either with Jason Bourne or Suicide Squad.
We should get it online earlier, though.
Nolan don't tolerate that leak ****, haha.
I assume Nolan prefers his trailers to be seen on the big screen by as many people as possible. The same way he prefers his films to be seem in theaters. So his trailers come out in theaters a few days before they are released online. Home viewing movies and trailers seems to be an after-thought for him. He's focused on the theatrical experience.
But, Rocketman, is right. A leak will happen and people will watch it that way. Whether Nolan is clueless about this or ignores it IDK.
We were supposedly getting a trailer today according to some very reliable people on NolanFans.
But relating to my disagreement of his view on leaked trailers... I'm also starting to change my tune in agreeing with him on the film vs. digital debate.
Digital has clearly made some incredible improvements in the past few years. Fincher's work on Gone Girl is an older example, but most of the stuff we're getting in theaters now is digitally filmed and it doesn't look much different from film anymore. The Shallows, The Martian, Straight Outta Compton, and Money Monster were all shot on the RED and they look fantastic.
Films shot with the Arri Alexa cameras (Sicario, Skyfall, Mad Max:Fury Road)are visually captivating as well. I agree that the gap in picture quality between digital and film has significantly decreased.
Films shot with the Arri Alexa cameras (Sicario, Skyfall, Mad Max:Fury Road)are visually captivating as well. I agree that the gap in picture quality between digital and film has significantly decreased.
Completely agreed, and I'd also argue that shooting on film doesn't hold much value now for theatrical viewing. In my experience, digital projection doesn't do many favors for movies shot on film - they usually look pixelated, notably desaturated, and flat.
This isn't the case for several premium theaters pocketedaround Californiathroughout America, for sure. But the great majority of American audiences don't get to see or appreciate the efforts of Tarantino, Nolan, PTA, etc. for sticking with film.
A lot of this can occur simply because theater chains don't invest in good projection devices. All movies I've seen at several Carmike Cinemas locations have honestly looked no better than a DVD blown up. More recently, I caught Star Trek Beyond in XD, a supposedly premiere format at Cinemark theaters, and the picture quality was very underwhelming (huge loss of color - even ads on Youtube looked much more sharp). Substandard IMAX locations are another example.