bosef982
Superhero
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2003
- Messages
- 6,211
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
The thing is, why would the WB embargo good reviews? If they're worried about certain plot bits being spoiled, embargo reviewers from saying it.
Early, positive reviews will help Inception. I mean, Paramount realized they had a good movie on their hands when they let reviewers publish early reviews of Star Trek -- that and good WOM gave it tremendous legs.
You embargo good reviews as close to the release date to possible so you don't blow your load early. Basically, think about it, if everyone is raving about it now online and then we have to wait three weeks, the hype machine loses momentum.
Have a slew of positive reviews take over the internet a week or so before the movie opens, hype remains high and your opening weekend is larger and more solid.
It's a smart move, because unlike Star Trek they don't have franchise power here. Plus, Paramount let those reviews drop because they wanted to assuage hardcore Trekkie fans fears while also tempting non-fans back in, and that was going to take quite a lot of marketing work.
Here, WB has to play it safe. It's the first time in a long while that it's released an original high-concept film with no prior franchise or proven market (outside of Nolan fans and TDK fans) attached to it. Even look at Avatar, which had Cameron's name and Terminator attached to every trailer to try and tap into the proven market for those films. So, they're going to delay as much as possible and create a fervor of mystery and hype that gets people to the theaters opening weekend to see this.
Last edited: